Loading...
Loading...
Found 26 Skills
Research a specific competitor across their website, reviews, ads, social presence, and pricing — then produce a structured sales battlecard with positioning traps, objection handlers, landmine questions, and win/loss themes. Chains web research, review mining, and ad intelligence. Use when sales needs competitive ammo or when entering a new market with established incumbents.
Create sales-ready competitive battlecards comparing your product against a specific competitor — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win/loss patterns. Use when preparing sales teams, creating competitive materials, or responding to 'why not competitor X?'
Create a reusable, evidence-backed competitive battlecard for sales, customer success, or product teams - a new card, or one rebuilt from scratch. Use when preparing an us-vs-them view for repeated use, supporting a recurring competitive sales motion, or compiling field-ready positioning, discovery questions, proof, and qualification guidance across deals. For one live buyer objection or "what do I say right now?" use competitive-objection-response; for checking or editing lines in a card or talk track that already exists, use competitive-enablement-refresh.
Tracks how competitors position themselves online — scrapes homepages, features, pricing, and blogs to extract messaging, value props, CTAs, and pricing models. Compares against previous snapshots to surface positioning shifts with before/after tracking. Produces messaging matrices, content gap analysis, white space maps, and battlecard inputs. Use when anyone asks about competitor messaging, positioning, website copy, content strategy, or how competitors present themselves. Triggers: "competitor positioning", "messaging comparison", "content gap", "what changed on their site", "competitor homepage", "landing page teardown", "marketing battlecard", "how do they describe their product", "share of voice", "counter-messaging". Do NOT use for business signals like funding/hiring (use competitor-intel), single-company deep dives (use company-deep-dive), or meeting prep (use meeting-prep).
Systematic competitive analysis for product positioning, sales enablement, and strategic planning. Use when the user wants to analyze competitors, build battlecards, create comparison pages, understand market positioning, or research competitive landscape. Also triggers on: 'competitor analysis,' 'competitive landscape,' 'battlecard,' 'win/loss analysis,' 'market positioning,' 'how do we compare to,' or 'what is [company] doing.'
Research your competitors and build an interactive battlecard. Outputs an HTML artifact with clickable competitor cards and a comparison matrix. Trigger with "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", or "what's new with [competitor]".
Competitive intelligence with positioning analysis, battlecards, and market monitoring. Use for competitor tracking, differentiation strategy, and win/loss analysis. Based on alirezarezvani/claude-skills.
Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.
Expert competitive intelligence and strategy guidance for B2B/SaaS companies. Use when conducting competitive research, creating battlecards, analyzing win/loss data, building market landscape maps, positioning against alternatives, handling competitive objections, writing comparison pages, or developing sales enablement for competitive situations. Use for competitive monitoring, feature comparisons, and market intelligence gathering.
Produce a Competitive Analysis Pack (competitive alternatives map, competitor landscape, differentiation & positioning hypotheses, battlecards, monitoring plan). Use for competitor research, competitive landscape, win/loss analysis, and positioning vs alternatives.
Work out what existing competitive sales enablement needs to change now - after a competitor move, a run of field questions, a request from sales, or on a cadence - and draft the update. The deliverable is the changed lines with their proof and date, for a single battlecard, talk track or deck as readily as a set - checks whether sections still hold up, classifies each as current, stale, unsupported or incomplete, prioritizes by what it would cost a rep to say, drafts the smallest useful change, and separates content fixes from distribution problems. Use for "what enablement is stale after this change", "update our talk tracks", "is the Northwind battlecard still accurate", "sales wants this line added - can we say it", "what should sales learn this week". When the deliverable is only the inventory of which claims hold up, with nothing to draft, that is competitive-asset-audit. Not for a new battlecard from scratch or a live objection.
When the user needs to handle competitive situations in sales conversations. Also use when the user mentions 'competitive deal,' 'against [competitor],' 'battlecard,' 'competitive positioning,' 'how to beat [competitor],' 'displacement deal,' or 'competitive objection.' Covers competitive intelligence, battlecards, positioning strategies, and winning against specific competitors.