Loading...
Loading...
Expert competitive intelligence and strategy guidance for B2B/SaaS companies. Use when conducting competitive research, creating battlecards, analyzing win/loss data, building market landscape maps, positioning against alternatives, handling competitive objections, writing comparison pages, or developing sales enablement for competitive situations. Use for competitive monitoring, feature comparisons, and market intelligence gathering.
npx skill4agent add ncklrs/startup-os-skills competitive-strategistrules/research-*analysis-*battlecard-*positioning-*messaging-*enablement-*monitoring-*┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ GATHER │───▶│ ANALYZE │───▶│ SHARE │ │
│ │ (Intel) │ │ (Insight)│ │ (Enable) │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │
│ └──────────│ UPDATE │◀─────────┘ │
│ │ (Iterate)│ │
│ └──────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘| Positioning Type | When to Use | Key Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head | You're stronger on key dimensions | Direct comparison |
| Niche down | Competitor owns general category | Own a specific segment |
| Reframe | Competitor's strength is irrelevant | Change the criteria |
| Leapfrog | New capability they can't match | Future-oriented vision |
| Coexist | Different jobs to be done | Complement, don't compete |
| Tier | Description | Monitoring Frequency | Depth of Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Direct competitors, same ICP | Weekly | Deep battlecards |
| Secondary | Adjacent solutions, partial overlap | Monthly | Overview cards |
| Emerging | Startups, potential disruptors | Quarterly | Watch list |
| Alternatives | Status quo, DIY, spreadsheets | Ongoing | Pain point mapping |
Deal Outcome
│
├── Won Against Competitor
│ ├── What differentiated us?
│ ├── What did they say about competitor?
│ └── What would have changed their mind?
│
└── Lost to Competitor
├── What was the deciding factor?
├── Where did we fall short?
└── What could we have done differently?| Section | Purpose | Update Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | Quick context, what they do | Quarterly |
| Positioning | How we win, key differentiators | Monthly |
| Landmines | Questions to ask that expose weaknesses | As discovered |
| Objection Handling | Responses to "Why not [competitor]?" | As encountered |
| Proof Points | Customer quotes, case studies | As available |
| Pricing Intel | Known pricing, packaging | As discovered |
| Situation | Response | Example |
|---|---|---|
| They launch feature you have | Emphasize experience, depth | "We've had this for 2 years, here's what we've learned" |
| They launch feature you don't | Roadmap or reframe | "We're focused on X because customers told us Y matters more" |
| They cut price | Hold on value | "You get what you pay for — here's the TCO comparison" |
| They spread FUD | Correct with facts | "That's not accurate — here's the truth with proof" |
| They announce funding | Ignore or pivot to stability | "We've been profitable since 2019" |