Loading...
Loading...
Found 523 Skills
Activated when users need to extract decision-making signals from a large amount of unorganized information (user feedback, competitor data, market reports, internal metrics). Typical trigger signals: "Too much data, don't know which to trust" "Users are saying all kinds of things" "Received a lot of feedback but don't know what the conclusion is". Scenarios where it is not called: Information is already structured and clear, requiring only simple judgment; or there is no information at all and decisions need to be made based on intuition. Difference from the "Investigation Research Method": This skill focuses on information processing (how to process after obtaining raw materials), while the latter focuses on information collection (how to obtain good raw materials).
Orchestrate jobs via depth propagation, parallel decomposition, relations, and control signals
Analyze articles for AI-generated content indicators and rewrite to pass WeChat's 3.27 non-human automated content creation detection. Checks for template phrases, transition word density, sentence uniformity, paragraph pattern repetition, and other signals that WeChat uses to flag AI content. Outputs a risk report and an optional humanized rewrite. Use when the user wants to check if an article looks AI-generated, make an article more human-like, bypass WeChat AI detection, or humanize AI-written content. Also trigger when the user mentions "去AI痕迹", "人性化润色", "微信AI检测", "anti-ai-check", "humanize article", "公众号发文检查".
Activate this skill when users are in the early weak stage and need to plan a 0-to-1 expansion path. Typical trigger signals: Limited resources but great ambition, facing the choice between "full-scale rollout or focused breakthrough", and the team showing a "roving bandit" tendency (chasing trends without deep cultivation). Scenarios where this skill is not called: Having a solid base and only needing optimization, limited market scale that does not require expansion, problems lying in execution rather than strategic paths. Difference from the "Asymmetric Strategy" skill: This skill solves "where to fight and how to expand" (path layer), while the latter solves "what paradigm to use for competition" (strategy layer).
Activate this skill when users waver between confidence and caution—either blindly optimistic and aggressive, or overly anxious and hesitant. Typical trigger signals: The team loses confidence in the face of difficulties, or conversely becomes overinflated when things go well, and swings from one extreme to the other in decision-making. Non-call scenarios: The team is in a healthy state (both confident and cautious), pure execution tasks do not require psychological adjustment, and the problem is technical rather than psychological. Difference from the "Strategy-Tactics Dialectics" skill: This skill solves "psychological state management of executors" (mental level), while the latter solves "strategic design of offensive and defensive levels" (strategic level).
Activated when users need to plan long-term competitive strategies against significantly stronger opponents (giant entry, resource gaps, brand disadvantages). Typical trigger signals: "Big companies are entering our track too", "Their resources are 100 times ours", "What should we do if we can't beat them?" Non-activation scenarios: Competitive situations where both sides are evenly matched or you have the upper hand, short-term solvable challenges, non-competitive decisions. Difference from "Concentrate Superior Forces": This skill plans the overall timeline and phased strategies, while the latter plans resource allocation for specific campaigns.
Activate this skill when the user is in an overall passive position but needs to create local initiative. Typical trigger signals: The company is contracting overall with low morale, doesn't know how to break the deadlock under resource disadvantage, needs to find micro breakthroughs in a macro passive situation. Scenarios not to call: Normal competition with equal strength between both parties, overall advantage already exists and only needs execution, the problem is not at the level of offense-defense conversion. Difference from the "Sixteen-Character Formula" skill: This skill solves "how to create micro initiative in macro passivity" (dialectics of offense and defense), while the latter solves "choosing rhythm based on the opponent's state" (timing judgment).
This skill is activated when users are faced with multiple intertwined problems, unable to determine priorities, and trapped in decision paralysis where "everything seems important". Typical trigger signals: Stagnant company growth with multiple departments reporting issues simultaneously, limited resources but unlimited demands, and teams arguing endlessly about direction without focus. Scenarios where it should not be invoked: The problem is clear and single, only execution is needed rather than analysis, or the user requires tool operations rather than strategic judgment. Difference from the "Concentrate Superior Forces" skill: This skill solves the problem of "seeing the full picture of the issue and identifying bottlenecks", while the latter solves "how to concentrate resources to break through after clarifying the situation".
This skill is activated when users are preparing to apply a successful methodology (from others or their own past experience) to a new scenario. Typical trigger signals: "Company X succeeded with method X, we should try it too" "This worked for me before, let's keep doing it" "The industry best practice is Y". Scenarios where it should not be invoked: Users are facing repeated occurrences of the same type of problem and need execution rather than methodology selection. Difference from "Contradiction Analysis Method": This skill emphasizes "different problems require different methods due to their distinct natures", while the latter focuses on "identifying the most important problem".
This skill is activated when the user's team faces execution problems—such as failing to meet OKRs, constantly changing plans, and passive team response to instructions. Typical trigger signals: Goals are set but execution deviates, plans can't keep up with changes, and the team only completes assigned tasks without proactive thinking. Non-trigger scenarios: Execution is good and only needs fine-tuning, the problem lies at the strategic level rather than the execution level, and individual work does not require a team execution framework. Difference from the "Strategy-Tactics Dialectics" skill: This skill solves "how to balance the three dimensions of execution" (execution layer), while the latter solves "dialectical design of offensive and defensive levels" (strategy layer).
Activated when users have limited resources but face multiple opportunities/threats and need to make trade-offs between different directions. Typical trigger signals: "5 customer opportunities arise at the same time" "Should we do both ToB and ToC" "What to do when resources are insufficient to allocate" Scenarios where it is not applicable: Sufficient resources allow multi-track advancement, the main direction has been determined and only execution is needed, there is no trade-off for a single goal. Difference from "Contradiction Analysis Method": This skill solves "how to concentrate resources to completely solve the problem after identifying the bottleneck", while the latter solves "where to find the bottleneck".
Activate this skill when users fall into "analysis paralysis" (want to act but dare not take action) or "blind action" (act without summarization or improvement). Typical trigger signals: "I need to finish my research before starting", "I don't know if I understand this industry well enough to start a business", "We've been doing things but have no methodology". Scenarios where it is not called: Scenarios where mature methodologies are already in effective operation, pure theoretical learning needs. Difference from "Seeking Truth from Facts Information Processing Method": This skill focuses on the complete cognitive cycle (practice - cognition - re-practice), while the latter focuses on specific techniques of information processing in a single cycle.