Loading...
Loading...
Found 19 Skills
Colloquial Review for Video Scripts, remove formal tone to make the script suitable for speaking. Use this when users mention "colloquial", "too formal", "sound like natural speech", "script review".
Use when verifying citations, bibliography, manuscript claims, source support, factual accuracy, numerical results, citation drift, or evidence provenance in academic work.
Runs a two-pass paper reflection loop with a Researcher pass and a Writer pass. Use when the user asks to reflect on a paper, improve a draft, run a research-agent and writer-agent review, critique the paper before submission, find both technical and writing issues, or produce a revision plan. The Researcher pass checks claims, citations, evidence, venue fit, missing related work, and reviewer risk; the Writer pass checks framing, structure, abstract, related work, prose, tables/figures, and response clarity. Outputs a merged action plan with evidence, priority, owner, and next skill to run.
Reviews source analysis, story, script, visual design, image prompts, storyboards, frozen keyframes, video prompts, and existing media in short-drama projects. Used when the user asks to "review/check script", "check assets or continuity", "check image/video prompts", "check source analysis", "review template feel", or "calibrate the project based on production observations". Only writes review issues, conclusions, and revision requirements; it does not modify source files on behalf of the owner.
Verify one by one whether factual claims in papers, reports, or research notes are supported by the original text of specified sources, and save the claim location, source pointer, original text position, verdict, and block status. Use when the user asks for "check if the citation supports this sentence", "perform a claim-to-source audit", "verify figures, trends, or causal statements", "check claims before submission", or requests the rw-claim-audit workflow.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "process beta reader feedback", "alpha reader feedback", "feedback round", "synthesize reader feedback", "reader notes", "beta feedback", "reader readiness check", "review copy", "send the draft to readers", "share with readers who don't use GitHub", "triage the reader panel", or wants to collect, reconcile, and act on external reader feedback for a story project. NOT for running the simulated reader panel itself (use reader-panel), rounds with a professional editor (use editorial-review), or for checking a manuscript is ready to query or publish (use submission or publishing).
Cuts raw talking-head footage into a clean jump cut. Takes one take or several joined (mp4 or mov, any aspect, 4K phone footage is fine), transcribes it word by word, removes retakes, false starts, fillers and dead pauses, and renders cut.mp4 at the source resolution plus words.json timed to the cut. The user approves the cut on a page with the whole transcript and every removed word struck through. Use when the user says "cut my video", "just cut it", "remove my mistakes", "cut out the retakes", "remove the pauses", "clean up this take", "jump cut this", "tighten this clip", or asks only for the cut of a raw take; start calls it for a full edit. Runs before style-edit. Not for a general request to edit a video or to make it look like a creator (that is start), not for adding captions, zooms or cards (style-edit), and not for analysing someone else's videos (creator-teardown).