citation-claim-audit

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Use when verifying citations, bibliography, manuscript claims, source support, factual accuracy, numerical results, citation drift, or evidence provenance in academic work.

4installs

Sourcevincenzoimp/academic-research-skills

Added on2026-05-20

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add vincenzoimp/academic-research-skills citation-claim-audit

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Citation Claim Audit

Audit claims before they become paper text, README claims, or wiki synthesis.

Read First

```
references/claim-audit.md
```
```
references/output-contracts.md
```

Workflow

Extract atomic claims.
Classify each claim: bibliographic, descriptive, methodological, comparative, causal, interpretive, or result.
Locate cited evidence and, when needed, the raw PDF or experiment artifact.
Assign a verdict.
Record unsupported, contradicted, or over-broad claims.
Propose minimal edits that preserve the supported meaning.

Audit Table

Use this structure in

analysis_outputs/claim-audit.md

or CSV:

claim_id	claim	class	cited_source	evidence_path	verdict	fix

Verdict Discipline

```
supported
```
: exact or clearly entailed by evidence.
```
partially-supported
```
: true only in narrower scope.
```
unsupported
```
: no evidence found.
```
contradicted
```
: evidence conflicts.
```
wrong-source
```
: source does not support the claim.
```
needs-human
```
: inaccessible or needs domain judgment.

Do Not

Fabricate missing references.
Treat citation count as truth.
Trust PDF-to-Markdown for exact numbers without checking the source.
Collapse "unsupported" into "false".
Strengthen claims during editing.