Back to Details

citation-claim-audit

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Citation Claim Audit

引用主张审核

Audit claims before they become paper text, README claims, or wiki synthesis.
在主张成为论文文本、README声明或维基综合内容之前对其进行审核。

Read First

必读内容

  • references/claim-audit.md
  • references/output-contracts.md
  • references/claim-audit.md
  • references/output-contracts.md

Workflow

工作流程

  1. Extract atomic claims.
  2. Classify each claim: bibliographic, descriptive, methodological, comparative, causal, interpretive, or result.
  3. Locate cited evidence and, when needed, the raw PDF or experiment artifact.
  4. Assign a verdict.
  5. Record unsupported, contradicted, or over-broad claims.
  6. Propose minimal edits that preserve the supported meaning.
  1. 提取原子主张。
  2. 对每个主张进行分类：bibliographic、descriptive、methodological、comparative、causal、interpretive或result类。
  3. 查找引用的证据，必要时查找原始PDF或实验工件。
  4. 给出判定结果。
  5. 记录未被支撑、被反驳或过于宽泛的主张。
  6. 提出最小化修改建议，以保留有支撑的核心含义。

Audit Table

审核表格

Use this structure in 
analysis_outputs/claim-audit.md
or CSV:
claim_idclaimclasscited_sourceevidence_pathverdictfix
在
analysis_outputs/claim-audit.md
或CSV中使用以下结构：
主张ID主张内容类别引用来源证据路径判定结果修改建议

Verdict Discipline

判定规则

  • supported
    : exact or clearly entailed by evidence.
  • partially-supported
    : true only in narrower scope.
  • unsupported
    : no evidence found.
  • contradicted
    : evidence conflicts.
  • wrong-source
    : source does not support the claim.
  • needs-human
    : inaccessible or needs domain judgment.
  • supported
    : 证据明确支持或可直接推导得出。
  • partially-supported
    : 仅在更窄范围内成立。
  • unsupported
    : 未找到相关证据。
  • contradicted
    : 证据存在冲突。
  • wrong-source
    : 来源不支持该主张。
  • needs-human
    : 无法获取证据或需要领域专家判断。

Do Not

禁止事项

  • Fabricate missing references.
  • Treat citation count as truth.
  • Trust PDF-to-Markdown for exact numbers without checking the source.
  • Collapse "unsupported" into "false".
  • Strengthen claims during editing.
  • 编造缺失的参考文献。
  • 将引用次数等同于事实。
  • 未经核对来源就信任PDF转Markdown后的精确数值。
  • 将“未被支撑”等同于“错误”。
  • 在修改过程中强化主张。