paper-writing-review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Paper Writing Review

论文写作与审阅

Write and revise scholarly text from project evidence, not from free-floating memory. Use this for papers, proposals, related work, abstracts, introductions, methods, limitations, and internal writing review. Use

rebuttal-revision-strategy

for reviewer response letters and rebuttal plans.

基于项目实证撰写和修订学术文本，而非仅凭记忆创作。适用于论文、研究提案、相关工作章节、摘要、引言、研究方法、局限性说明，以及内部写作审阅。如需撰写审稿回复信和反驳计划，请使用

rebuttal-revision-strategy

。

Read First

必读文档

```
references/repository-contract.md
```
```
references/claim-audit.md
```

```
references/repository-contract.md
```
```
references/claim-audit.md
```

Inputs

输入要求

Before writing, identify:

target artifact: proposal, paper, related work, abstract, section draft, or slides
venue or audience
citation style or LaTeX template
source corpus
intended contribution
claims that must be preserved or avoided

写作前，请明确：

目标成果：提案、论文、相关工作章节、摘要、章节草稿或幻灯片
目标会议/期刊或受众
引用格式或LaTeX模板
参考语料库
预期贡献
必须保留或避免的观点主张

Writing Rules

写作规则

Use
```
sota/
```
,
```
wiki/
```
, and
```
sources/
```
as evidence.
Preserve citation keys, labels, equations, and references unless asked to edit them.
Mark missing evidence instead of inventing citations.
Keep limitations and scope explicit.
Separate author claims from cited claims.
For related work, synthesize themes instead of listing papers mechanically.

以
```
sota/
```
、
```
wiki/
```
和
```
sources/
```
中的内容为实证依据。
除非明确要求修改，否则保留引用标识、标签、公式和参考文献。
若缺少实证依据，请标注出来，切勿编造引用。
明确说明研究局限性和范围。
将作者的主张与引用文献中的主张区分开。
撰写相关工作章节时，需整合主题，而非机械罗列论文。

Review Modes

审阅模式

```
structure
```
: argument flow, section order, contribution clarity.
```
method
```
: validity of research design, dataset, metric, and comparison.
```
evidence
```
: claim support and citation alignment.
```
style
```
: clarity, concision, academic tone.
```
submission
```
: format, figures, tables, bibliography, reproducibility statement.

```
structure
```
：论证逻辑、章节顺序、贡献清晰度。
```
method
```
：研究设计、数据集、指标及对比的有效性。
```
evidence
```
：主张的支撑性与引用的一致性。
```
style
```
：表述清晰度、简洁性及学术语气。
```
submission
```
：格式、图表、参考文献、可复现性声明。

Output

输出要求

For major revisions, produce:

summary of changes
unresolved evidence gaps
claim/citation audit notes
suggested next checks

对于重大修订，需提供：

修改摘要
未解决的实证缺口
主张/引用审核笔记
建议的后续检查事项