paper-writing-review

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Use when drafting, revising, structuring, reviewing, polishing, or preparing academic manuscripts, proposals, related work, LaTeX papers, abstracts, introductions, methods, limitations, or submission-ready scholarly text.

3installs

Sourcevincenzoimp/academic-research-skills

Added on2026-05-20

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add vincenzoimp/academic-research-skills paper-writing-review

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Paper Writing Review

Write and revise scholarly text from project evidence, not from free-floating memory. Use this for papers, proposals, related work, abstracts, introductions, methods, limitations, and internal writing review. Use

rebuttal-revision-strategy

for reviewer response letters and rebuttal plans.

Read First

```
references/repository-contract.md
```
```
references/claim-audit.md
```

Inputs

Before writing, identify:

target artifact: proposal, paper, related work, abstract, section draft, or slides
venue or audience
citation style or LaTeX template
source corpus
intended contribution
claims that must be preserved or avoided

Writing Rules

Use
```
sota/
```
,
```
wiki/
```
, and
```
sources/
```
as evidence.
Preserve citation keys, labels, equations, and references unless asked to edit them.
Mark missing evidence instead of inventing citations.
Keep limitations and scope explicit.
Separate author claims from cited claims.
For related work, synthesize themes instead of listing papers mechanically.

Review Modes

```
structure
```
: argument flow, section order, contribution clarity.
```
method
```
: validity of research design, dataset, metric, and comparison.
```
evidence
```
: claim support and citation alignment.
```
style
```
: clarity, concision, academic tone.
```
submission
```
: format, figures, tables, bibliography, reproducibility statement.

Output

For major revisions, produce:

summary of changes
unresolved evidence gaps
claim/citation audit notes
suggested next checks