Framework Overview of Major Historical Events
Select one macro historical event or process each day and provide a framework-based overview to help users:
- Form a systematic cognitive framework: Understand the logic of how the world operates
- Accumulate social talking points: Gain catchy one-liners that can be blurted out
- Connect to current hot topics: Understand current affairs through the lens of history
Core Positioning
| Dimension | Positioning |
|---|
| Event Granularity | Macro events (e.g., World War II, Industrial Revolution), not individual or single-point events |
| Analysis Depth | Framework overview (Causes → Process → Outcomes → Impacts), similar to a textbook chapter |
| Output Purpose | Cognitive framework + social talking points, not in-depth academic research |
| Word Count Range | 1500-2500 words |
Topic Selection Priority
Priority 1: Link to recent hot topics
↓ If no relevant hot topics / already covered
Priority 2: Innovative topics outside the preset pool
↓ If all pool topics are covered
Priority 3: Random exploration of unknown events
Hot Topic Judgment Process
When executing the skill, must first call the search tool to obtain hot topics:
Step 1: Call the search_web tool
Query: "This week's international news hotspots" or "Today's major news"
Step 2: Extract 2-3 hot topics from the search results
Step 3: Judge if there is a historical connection
- Strong connection: Same region / same type (Russia-Ukraine conflict → Cold War/Soviet disintegration)
- Weak connection: Similar structure/pattern (AI competition → Space Race)
- No connection: Skip hot topic priority and proceed to topics outside the preset pool
Step 4: Select the historical event with the highest relevance
Connection Judgment Criteria:
| Connection Type | Definition | Example |
|---|
| Regional Connection | Historical events in the same region | Middle East conflicts → Crusades/Ottoman Empire |
| Type Connection | Events of the same type | Financial crisis → Great Depression/2008 Crisis |
| Structural Connection | Similar game/evolution patterns | Great power competition → Cold War/pre-WWI era |
| Person/Organization Connection | Involves the same subject | EU crisis → EU integration process |
Topic Selection Rules
- Hot Topic First: Obtain hot topics through the above process and select major events that can establish a "historical lens" relationship
- Innovation Bonus: Not limited to the preset pool, creative niche topics get extra points
- Duplication Removal Mechanism: Already covered events will not be repeated (recorded in )
- Diversity: Avoid consecutive selection of events from the same region/period
Event Type Pool (Reference, Encourage Innovation)
| Type | Example |
|---|
| Wars and Conflicts | World War II, Cold War, Crusades, Pacific War |
| Revolutions and Transformations | French Revolution, Industrial Revolution, Russian Revolution, Meiji Restoration |
| Rise and Fall of Empires | Roman Empire, Mongol Empire, British Empire, Ottoman Empire |
| Ideological Movements | Renaissance, Enlightenment, Protestant Reformation, May Fourth Movement |
| Economic Changes | Great Depression, Bretton Woods System, Oil Crisis, Globalization Wave |
| Technological Waves | Age of Discovery, Space Race, Internet Revolution, AI Revolution |
| Institutional Evolution | Evolution of democratic systems, Establishment of the United Nations, EU Integration |
Historical Period Distribution
Ensure diversity, avoid selecting events from the same period for 2 consecutive times:
- Ancient (Pre-476 BC)
- Medieval (476-1453 AD)
- Early Modern (1453-1789 AD)
- Modern (1789-1914 AD)
- Contemporary (1914-1991 AD)
- Current Era (1991-present)
Regional Distribution
Ensure diversity:
- China / East Asia
- Europe
- Americas
- Middle East / West Asia
- South Asia / Southeast Asia
- Africa
- Global Events
Duplication Check Process
- Read (treat as empty array if it does not exist)
- Check if the candidate event is already in the history records
- If duplicate: Re-select (up to 3 times)
- If still duplicate after 3 attempts:
Your historical archive is already quite rich! Human history is vast, please try again later or specify the historical period you are interested in.
- If successful: Append the event name to the history and write back
Output Saving
- Save Directory:
- File Naming:
{YYYY-MM-DD}_{Event Name}.md
- Inform the user of the file path after saving is completed
Output Format (Strictly Follow)
markdown
---
# {Event Name}: Framework Overview
---
## 1. One-Sentence Definition
{Summarize the essence of this historical event/process in one sentence, including time span and core significance}
---
## 2. Background and Causes
**Era Background**: {Macro environment, power structure, social status}
**Direct Trigger**: {Specific trigger that initiated the event}
**Deep-seated Causes**: {Structural contradictions, long-accumulated problems}
> **Key Insight**: {One sentence pointing out the core causal logic}
---
## 3. Key Processes
**Phase 1: {Phase Name} (Time Period)**
{Major events and turning points}
**Phase 2: {Phase Name} (Time Period)**
{Major events and turning points}
**Phase 3: {Phase Name} (Time Period)**
{Major events and turning points}
> **Turning Point**: {Mark the most critical 1-2 turning points and their significance}
---
## 4. Outcomes and Impacts
**Immediate Consequences**: {Direct, short-term results}
**Long-term Impacts**: {Impacts on later decades/centuries}
**Legacy**: {Institutions, concepts or lessons left to today}
---
## 5. Cognitive Framework
**What does this history teach us?**
{Extract 2-3 transferable cognitive models or thinking frameworks}
**How to use it to understand the present?**
{If there are related current hot topics, briefly connect; omit if none}
---
## 6. Talking Points Cheat Sheet
> 💡 **Golden Sentence 1**: {A catchy one-sentence summary}
> 💡 **Golden Sentence 2**: {A counterintuitive cold fact or interesting detail}
> 💡 **Golden Sentence 3**: {An enlightening historical analogy or insight}
---
Golden Sentence Standards
Each golden sentence must meet:
| Dimension | Requirement |
|---|
| Length | No more than 30 words (easy to remember and retell) |
| Structure | One core assertion + one supporting point |
| Independence | Understandable without context |
Division of Labor for Three Golden Sentences:
| Golden Sentence | Type | Function | Example |
|---|
| Golden Sentence 1 | Summative Assertion | Summarize the essence of the event | "The Cold War was essentially a debate about how humans should live" |
| Golden Sentence 2 | Counterintuitive Fact | Provide a highlight for talking points | "The Internet was originally designed to maintain communication during nuclear war" |
| Golden Sentence 3 | Historical Analogy | Connect to the present | "Every technological revolution has people saying 'the human body can't withstand it'" |
Language Style
- Easy to Understand: Avoid academic jargon, explain complex concepts in everyday language
- Clear Framework: Logical and structured, allowing readers to quickly grasp the main thread
- Highlighted Golden Sentences: Use bold or in the text to highlight key retellable sentences
- Objective Presentation: Explain "why" instead of judging "right or wrong"
Citation Norms
- All historical facts must be verifiable
- Mark
(According to historical records)
or (According to academic research)
when the source cannot be confirmed
- Objectively present multiple viewpoints when encountering academic disputes
Restrictive Principles
✅ Do:
- Select macro events, not individual events
- Provide framework-based overview to help form cognitive structure
- Highlight retellable golden sentences and talking points
- Present objectively and avoid subjective judgment
❌ Don't:
- Select overly segmented single-point events (e.g., "a certain battle" as a standalone article)
- Conduct in-depth academic causal chain analysis (that's the positioning of the old version of the skill)
- Make moral judgments or political stances
- Express positions on sensitive historical topics
Example: Industrial Revolution
Industrial Revolution: Framework Overview
1. One-Sentence Definition
The Industrial Revolution (c. 1760-1840) was a historic transition of humanity from an agricultural society to an industrial society, with machines replacing manual labor, factories replacing workshops, and cities replacing villages, completely reshaping human production methods, social structures, and the global pattern.
2. Background and Causes
Era Background: By the 18th century, Britain had completed the bourgeois revolution and established a legal system protecting private property; the Enclosure Movement released a large number of free laborers; overseas colonies provided raw materials and markets.
Direct Trigger: Technological breakthroughs in the textile industry - the 1764 Spinning Jenny and the 1769 improved Watt steam engine, making large-scale mechanical production possible.
Deep-seated Causes:
- Institution: Patent laws protect inventions and innovations
- Capital: Banking system supports industrial investment
- Resources: Britain has abundant coal and iron resources close to water transportation
Key Insight: The Industrial Revolution was not a sudden outbreak of technology, but the result of the simultaneous maturity of four factors: institution, capital, resources, and market.
3. Key Processes
Phase 1: Textile Industry Leadership (1760-1800)
The cotton textile industry was mechanized first, the concept of "factory" was born, and Manchester became the "Workshop of the World".
Phase 2: Steam Age (1800-1840)
Steam engines were applied to mining, metallurgy, and transportation, railway networks began to be laid, and coal became a strategic resource.
Phase 3: Global Diffusion (1840-1914)
The Industrial Revolution spread from Britain to continental Europe, the United States, and Japan, forming the "Second Industrial Revolution" (electricity, chemical industry, internal combustion engine).
Turning Point: The opening of the Liverpool-Manchester Railway in 1830 - Railways not only transported goods, but also transported the ideas and models of the Industrial Revolution.
4. Outcomes and Impacts
Immediate Consequences:
- Productivity explosion: British industrial output quadrupled from 1800 to 1850
- Accelerated urbanization: Urban population accounted for 20% of Britain in 1800, rising to 50% in 1850
- Social differentiation: A new class confrontation formed between factory owners and the working class
Long-term Impacts:
- Reshaped global pattern: Industrialized countries became the dominant forces in the world
- Embryo of modern society: Separation of work and life, time discipline, consumer culture
- Environmental costs: Problems such as soot pollution and resource depletion began to emerge
Legacy:
- The "growth logic" initiated by the Industrial Revolution is still the underlying assumption of the global economy
- Anxiety about employment structure changes caused by technological transformation (similar to today's discussions about AI replacing human labor)
5. Cognitive Framework
What does this history teach us?
- Four-Factor Model: Technological breakthroughs require the simultaneous maturity of four factors: institution, capital, resources, and market
- First-Mover Advantage and Path Dependence: Britain's first-mover advantage continued to influence the world pattern for the next 150 years
- Social Costs of Technological Revolution: Each technological revolution is accompanied by drastic social restructuring and growing pains
How to use it to understand the present?
The AI revolution is called the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" - we are at a similar historical turning point, facing the same challenges of productivity leap, drastic employment structure changes, and social institutions lagging behind technological progress.
6. Talking Points Cheat Sheet
💡 Golden Sentence 1: The essence of the Industrial Revolution is "machines replacing manual labor, factories replacing workshops, cities replacing villages" - 12 words summarizing humanity's greatest social transformation.
💡 Golden Sentence 2: When railways opened in 1830, some people worried "the human body cannot withstand 30 km/h" - similar panic occurs in every technological revolution.
💡 Golden Sentence 3: Britain could industrialize first not because the British were smarter, but because inventions and innovations could make money there - institutions are more important than intelligence.