project-referee

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Critiques ML conference papers with reviewer-style feedback. Use when users want to anticipate reviewer concerns, identify weaknesses, check claim-evidence gaps, or find missing citations.

2installs

Sourcesundial-org/skills

Added on2026-03-29

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add sundial-org/skills project-referee

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Project Referee

Review Workflow

Step 1: Assess Manuscript Stage

Ask or determine the manuscript stage:

Early draft: Focus on novelty, feasibility, relevance, structure
Mid-stage draft: Focus on development trajectory, completeness, preliminary results
Final submission: Apply full review criteria (see references/reviewer-instructions.md)

Step 2: Stage-Specific Review

Early Draft Protocol:

Assess core contribution novelty and significance
Evaluate method feasibility with current technology
Check alignment with venue scope
Review logical structure and completeness
Identify major missing components
Suggest high-level direction

Mid-Stage Protocol:

Evaluate development progress
Check section completeness
Assess preliminary results against claims
Review literature coverage
Identify specific weaknesses
Provide targeted refinements

Final Submission Protocol: Apply complete review process. See references/reviewer-instructions.md for the full reviewer form.

Step 3: Search for Related Work

Proactively search for missing citations:

Recent work in the paper's domain
Papers with similar methods or contributions
Relevant benchmarks and baselines
Use WebSearch to find recent publications

Step 4: Provide Structured Feedback

Use the output format in references/reviewer-instructions.md:

Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Questions
Soundness (1-4), Presentation (1-4), Contribution (1-4)
Overall Score (1-10), Confidence (1-5)

Neuro-Symbolic Papers

For papers combining LLMs with symbolic reasoning, see references/neuro-symbolic-review-criteria.md for additional criteria:

Symbolic formulation quality
Solver selection and integration
Faithfulness and verification
Comparison to baselines (Logic-LM, LINC)

References

references/reviewer-instructions.md - Full reviewer form
references/neuro-symbolic-review-criteria.md - Neuro-symbolic specific criteria