Back to Details

project-referee

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Project Referee

Project Referee

Review Workflow

评审工作流

Step 1: Assess Manuscript Stage

步骤1：评估手稿阶段

Ask or determine the manuscript stage:
  • Early draft: Focus on novelty, feasibility, relevance, structure
  • Mid-stage draft: Focus on development trajectory, completeness, preliminary results
  • Final submission: Apply full review criteria (see references/reviewer-instructions.md)
询问或确定手稿所处的阶段：
  • 初稿：重点关注创新性、可行性、相关性、结构
  • 中期草稿：重点关注开发轨迹、完整性、初步结果
  • 终稿投稿版本：采用完整评审标准（参见 references/reviewer-instructions.md）

Step 2: Stage-Specific Review

步骤2：分阶段针对性评审

Early Draft Protocol:
  1. Assess core contribution novelty and significance
  2. Evaluate method feasibility with current technology
  3. Check alignment with venue scope
  4. Review logical structure and completeness
  5. Identify major missing components
  6. Suggest high-level direction
Mid-Stage Protocol:
  1. Evaluate development progress
  2. Check section completeness
  3. Assess preliminary results against claims
  4. Review literature coverage
  5. Identify specific weaknesses
  6. Provide targeted refinements
Final Submission Protocol: Apply complete review process. See references/reviewer-instructions.md for the full reviewer form.
初稿评审规则：
  1. 评估核心贡献的创新性和重要性
  2. 基于现有技术评估方法的可行性
  3. 检查与投稿目标平台的范围匹配度
  4. 评审逻辑结构和完整性
  5. 识别主要的缺失内容
  6. 给出宏观方向建议
中期草稿评审规则：
  1. 评估开发进展
  2. 检查各章节完整性
  3. 对照论点评估初步结果是否匹配
  4. 评审文献覆盖范围
  5. 识别具体的不足
  6. 提供针对性的改进建议
终稿投稿版本评审规则： 采用完整评审流程。完整的审稿人表格参见 references/reviewer-instructions.md

Step 3: Search for Related Work

步骤3：检索相关工作

Proactively search for missing citations:
  • Recent work in the paper's domain
  • Papers with similar methods or contributions
  • Relevant benchmarks and baselines
  • Use WebSearch to find recent publications
主动检索缺失的引用文献：
  • 论文所属领域的最新研究
  • 采用相似方法或有相似贡献的论文
  • 相关的基准测试和基线方法
  • 使用WebSearch查找最新发表的论文

Step 4: Provide Structured Feedback

步骤4：提供结构化反馈

Use the output format in references/reviewer-instructions.md:
  • Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Questions
  • Soundness (1-4), Presentation (1-4), Contribution (1-4)
  • Overall Score (1-10), Confidence (1-5)
使用 references/reviewer-instructions.md 中指定的输出格式：
  • 摘要、优势、不足、问题
  • 合理性（1-4分）、呈现质量（1-4分）、贡献度（1-4分）
  • 总体评分（1-10分）、置信度（1-5分）

Neuro-Symbolic Papers

神经符号论文

For papers combining LLMs with symbolic reasoning, see references/neuro-symbolic-review-criteria.md for additional criteria:
  • Symbolic formulation quality
  • Solver selection and integration
  • Faithfulness and verification
  • Comparison to baselines (Logic-LM, LINC)
对于结合LLMs与符号推理的论文，额外评审标准参见 references/neuro-symbolic-review-criteria.md：
  • 符号表述质量
  • 求解器的选择与集成效果
  • 可信度与验证效果
  • 与基线方法（Logic-LM、LINC）的对比

References

参考文献

  • references/reviewer-instructions.md - Full reviewer form
  • references/neuro-symbolic-review-criteria.md - Neuro-symbolic specific criteria
  • references/reviewer-instructions.md - 完整审稿人表格
  • references/neuro-symbolic-review-criteria.md - 神经符号方向专项评审标准