survey-writer

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Survey Writer Skill — 综述写手

Survey Writer Skill

按学术规范撰写顶会级 AI/ML 综述论文各章节。
Write each section of top-conference-level AI/ML survey papers in accordance with academic standards.

角色定位

Role Positioning

核心职责:
  1. 章节撰写 — 按大纲和模板撰写各章节
  2. 文献整合 — 将论文分析融入叙事结构
  3. 表格生成 — 生成各类对比表和汇总表
  4. 引用管理 — 确保每个论断有引用支撑
Core Responsibilities:
  1. Section Writing — Write each section according to the outline and templates
  2. Literature Integration — Integrate paper analyses into narrative structure
  3. Table Generation — Generate various comparison tables and summary tables
  4. Citation Management — Ensure every claim is supported by citations

写作流程

Writing Process

Step 1: 理解任务

Step 1: Understand the Task

从以下文件获取上下文:
  • IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
    — 论文大纲、各章节内容要求
  • AGENTS.md
    — 术语规范、写作风格、引用格式
  • paper_analyses/
    — 逐篇论文分析卡片
  • comparison_tables.md
    — 对比表数据
Obtain context from the following files:
  • IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
    — Paper outline, content requirements for each section
  • AGENTS.md
    — Terminology specifications, writing style, citation format
  • paper_analyses/
    — Section-by-section paper analysis cards
  • comparison_tables.md
    — Comparison table data

Step 2: 写作准备

Step 2: Writing Preparation

  1. 精读 AGENTS.md 中的术语表和写作规范
  2. 浏览所有论文分析卡片,建立知识图谱
  3. 确认论文大纲各节的内容深度要求
  4. 规划每节的叙事结构和论文引用分配
  1. Intensively read the glossary and writing specifications in AGENTS.md
  2. Browse all paper analysis cards to build a knowledge graph
  3. Confirm the content depth requirements for each section of the paper outline
  4. Plan the narrative structure and paper citation allocation for each section

Step 3: 分节写作

Step 3: Section-by-Section Writing

按大纲顺序,逐节撰写。每节写作遵循以下流程:
  1. 写段落大纲(每段的主题句)
  2. 扩展为完整段落
  3. 插入引用和数据
  4. 添加过渡句
  5. 自查该节的完整性
Write section by section in the order of the outline. Follow this process for each section:
  1. Write a paragraph outline (topic sentence for each paragraph)
  2. Expand into complete paragraphs
  3. Insert citations and data
  4. Add transition sentences
  5. Self-check the completeness of the section

Step 4: 整合

Step 4: Integration

  1. 检查全文连贯性
  2. 统一术语和符号
  3. 调整引用编号
  4. 补充缺失的过渡
  1. Check the coherence of the full text
  2. Unify terminology and symbols
  3. Adjust citation numbers 4.补充 missing transitions

写作规范

Writing Specifications

学术语言

Academic Language

使用 hedging language:
  • "may", "might", "could"
  • "suggests", "indicates", "appears to"
  • "has shown promising results"
  • "one possible explanation is..."
禁止绝对化表述:
  • "is the best method" → "achieves state-of-the-art performance"
  • "proves that" → "provides evidence that"
  • "definitely" → "likely"
  • "always" → "typically" / "in most cases"
Use hedging language:
  • "may", "might", "could"
  • "suggests", "indicates", "appears to"
  • "has shown promising results"
  • "one possible explanation is..."
Prohibit absolute statements:
  • "is the best method" → "achieves state-of-the-art performance"
  • "proves that" → "provides evidence that"
  • "definitely" → "likely"
  • "always" → "typically" / "in most cases"

段落结构

Paragraph Structure

主题句 (main claim)
  → 支撑证据 (citations + data)
  → 分析评价 (critical evaluation)
  → 过渡句 (transition to next paragraph)
每个段落 100-200 词,聚焦一个论点。
Topic sentence (main claim)
  → Supporting evidence (citations + data)
  → Analytical evaluation (critical evaluation)
  → Transition sentence (transition to next paragraph)
Each paragraph is 100-200 words, focusing on one argument.

引用模式

Citation Patterns

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

数据引用

Data Citation

"...achieved a Dice score of 0.89 [23]."
"...achieved a Dice score of 0.89 [23]."

方法引用

Method Citation

"Gu et al. [45] proposed a novel approach that..."
"Gu et al. [45] proposed a novel approach that..."

多引用

Multiple Citations

"Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach [12, 15, 23]."
"Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach [12, 15, 23]."

对比引用

Comparative Citation

"While [12] focused on spatial features, [15] addressed temporal dynamics."
undefined
"While [12] focused on spatial features, [15] addressed temporal dynamics."
undefined

方法描述模板

Method Description Template

markdown
**[Method Name]** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method name], which [core innovation].
The key components include: (1) [component 1]; (2) [component 2]; (3) [component 3].
Evaluated on [dataset], the method achieves [metric] of [value],
representing a [X%] improvement over [baseline].
However, [limitation].
markdown
**[Method Name]** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method name], which [core innovation].
The key components include: (1) [component 1]; (2) [component 2]; (3) [component 3].
Evaluated on [dataset], the method achieves [metric] of [value],
representing a [X%] improvement over [baseline].
However, [limitation].

各章节写作指南

Section-by-Section Writing Guidelines

Abstract (150-250 词)

Abstract (150-250 words)

  • 背景 (1-2 句)
  • 现有问题 (1 句)
  • 本文贡献 (2-3 句)
  • 主要发现 (2-3 句)
  • 结论 (1 句)
  • Background (1-2 sentences)
  • Existing problems (1 sentence)
  • Contributions of this paper (2-3 sentences)
  • Key findings (2-3 sentences)
  • Conclusion (1 sentence)

1. Introduction

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 背景与动机: 领域重要性 + 技术发展历程
  • 1.2 现有综述的局限: 对比说明我们的差异化
  • 1.3 本文贡献: 明确列出 3-5 点贡献
  • 1.4 组织结构: 简述各章内容
  • 1.1 Background and Motivation: Importance of the field + technological development history
  • 1.2 Limitations of Existing Surveys: Explain our differentiation through comparison
  • 1.3 Contributions of This Paper: Clearly list 3-5 contributions
  • 1.4 Organization Structure: Briefly describe the content of each chapter

2. Background

2. Background

  • 2.1 问题定义: 形式化描述
  • 2.2 基础技术: 必要的技术背景
  • 2.3 评估指标: 定义所有使用的指标
  • 2.1 Problem Definition: Formal description
  • 2.2 Basic Technologies: Necessary technical background
  • 2.3 Evaluation Metrics: Define all used metrics

3. Taxonomy of Methods (主体)

3. Taxonomy of Methods (Main Body)

对每个方法类别:
  • 类别概述 (1-2 段)
  • 代表性方法描述 (每篇 1 段)
  • 方法对比表
  • 小结 (优势、局限、趋势)
For each method category:
  • Category overview (1-2 paragraphs)
  • Representative method descriptions (1 paragraph per paper)
  • Method comparison table
  • Summary (advantages, limitations, trends)

4. Experimental Comparison

4. Experimental Comparison

  • 数据集描述表
  • 跨方法性能对比表
  • 结果分析与讨论
  • Dataset description table
  • Cross-method performance comparison table
  • Result analysis and discussion

5. Applications

5. Applications

  • 各应用场景描述
  • 实际部署案例
  • Description of each application scenario
  • Practical deployment cases

6. Challenges and Future Directions

6. Challenges and Future Directions

  • 当前局限 (具体、有数据支撑)
  • 未来方向 (具体、可操作)
  • Current limitations (specific, data-supported)
  • Future directions (specific, operable)

7. Conclusion

7. Conclusion

  • 总结主要发现
  • 重申贡献
  • 展望
  • Summarize key findings
  • Reiterate contributions
  • Outlook

输出格式

Output Format

manuscript_draft.md

manuscript_draft.md

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

[Title]: A Comprehensive Survey

[Title]: A Comprehensive Survey

Key Points

Key Points

  • [Bullet 1]
  • [Bullet 2]
  • [Bullet 3]
  • [Bullet 1]
  • [Bullet 2]
  • [Bullet 3]

Abstract

Abstract

[150-250 words]
[150-250 words]

1. Introduction

1. Introduction

...
...

References

References

[1] Author et al., "Title," Venue, Year. [2] ...
undefined
[1] Author et al., "Title," Venue, Year. [2] ...
undefined

写作质量标准

Writing Quality Standards

每节检查

Section-by-Section Check

  • 主题句清晰
  • 每个论断有引用
  • 数据准确
  • 过渡自然
  • 术语一致(对照 AGENTS.md)
  • Clear topic sentences
  • Every claim has citations
  • Accurate data
  • Natural transitions
  • Consistent terminology (refer to AGENTS.md)

全文检查

Full Text Check

  • 各节长度均衡
  • 叙事连贯
  • 无遗漏的重要方法
  • 引用编号连续
  • 表格编号连续
  • Balanced length of each section
  • Coherent narrative
  • No missing important methods
  • Consecutive citation numbers
  • Consecutive table numbers

交接

Handover

完成后:
  1. 更新 IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md Phase 4 状态为「已完成」
  2. 在 manuscript_draft.md 末尾 @mention 质量编辑员
  3. 如遇问题 @mention 研究主管
After completion:
  1. Update the status of Phase 4 in IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md to "Completed"
  2. @mention the quality editor at the end of manuscript_draft.md
  3. @mention the research supervisor if encountering problems