kpc-comb

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Key Purchase Criteria (KPC) Comb

关键采购标准(KPC)梳状图

Metadata

元数据

  • Name: kpc-comb
  • Description: Key purchase criteria importance vs performance chart
  • Triggers: KPC, key purchase criteria, buying factors, decision criteria
  • 名称: kpc-comb
  • 描述: 关键采购标准重要性vs表现图表
  • 触发词: KPC, key purchase criteria, buying factors, decision criteria

Instructions

说明

Analyze key purchase criteria for $ARGUMENTS to identify competitive gaps.
针对$ARGUMENTS分析关键采购标准,识别竞品差距。

Framework

框架

The Comb Chart

梳状图

Importance
10 ┤         ╭───╮     ╭───╮
   │    ╭───╮│   │╭───╮│   │
 8 ┤    │   ││   ││   ││   │     ╭───╮
   │    │   ││   ││   ││   │╭───╮│   │
 6 ┤╭───╮│   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
 4 ┤│   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
 2 ┤│   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
   │└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘
    └──────────────────────────────────
      P    Q    R    S    T    U    V
              Performance
重要性
10 ┤         ╭───╮     ╭───╮
   │    ╭───╮│   │╭───╮│   │
 8 ┤    │   ││   ││   ││   │     ╭───╮
   │    │   ││   ││   ││   │╭───╮│   │
 6 ┤╭───╮│   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
 4 ┤│   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
 2 ┤│   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   ││   │
   │└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘
    └──────────────────────────────────
      P    Q    R    S    T    U    V
              表现

KPC Categories

KPC类别

CategoryExamples
ProductFeatures, quality, reliability
PriceTotal cost, value, ROI
ServiceSupport, delivery, warranty
BrandReputation, trust, social proof
ConvenienceAvailability, ease of use, speed
类别示例
产品功能、质量、可靠性
价格总成本、价值、ROI
服务支持、交付、保修
品牌声誉、信任、社交背书
便利性可得性、易用性、速度

Output

输出

undefined
undefined

Key Purchase Criteria: [Product/Category]

关键采购标准: [产品/类别]

Criteria Analysis

标准分析

CriterionImportance (1-10)Our PerformanceCompetitor AGap
Price968-2
Quality897+2
Features778-1
Support656-1
Brand589-1
Speed497+2
标准重要性(1-10)我方表现竞品A差距
价格968-2
质量897+2
功能778-1
支持656-1
品牌589-1
速度497+2

Comb Visualization

梳状图可视化

High Importance, Low Performance (Fix Priority):
┌─────────────────┐
│  PRICE (9 vs 6) │  ← Gap: -2
└─────────────────┘

High Importance, High Performance (Maintain):
┌─────────────────┐
│ QUALITY (8 vs 9)│  ← Advantage: +2
└─────────────────┘
高重要性、低表现(优先改进):
┌─────────────────┐
│  价格 (9 vs 6) │  ← 差距: -2
└─────────────────┘

高重要性、高表现(保持优势):
┌─────────────────┐
│ 质量 (8 vs 9)│  ← 优势: +2
└─────────────────┘

Strategic Implications

战略启示

Strengths (Maintain):
  1. Quality - Strong competitive advantage
  2. Speed - Differentiator in market
Weaknesses (Improve):
  1. Price - Most important criterion, underperforming
  2. Support - Gap vs. competitors
Opportunities:
  1. Price repositioning
  2. Support enhancement
优势(保持):
  1. 质量 - 强大的竞争优势
  2. 速度 - 市场差异化卖点
劣势(改进):
  1. 价格 - 最重要的标准,表现落后
  2. 支持 - 与竞品存在差距
机会:
  1. 价格重新定位
  2. 服务支持升级

Action Plan

行动计划

PriorityCriterionActionImpact
1PriceCost reduction / value messagingHigh
2SupportInvestment in serviceMedium
undefined
优先级标准行动影响
1价格成本优化/价值传递
2支持服务投入
undefined

Tips

提示

  • Focus on high importance criteria first
  • Weight by customer segment if needed
  • Update regularly as market evolves
  • Validate with customer research
  • 优先关注高重要性标准
  • 如有需要,按客户群体加权
  • 随市场变化定期更新
  • 通过客户调研验证