li-comment
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chineseli-comment
li-comment
Commenting is the highest-leverage thing on LinkedIn and the easiest to do
badly. A comment on a post with 400 reactions gets seen by more people than
most of your own posts. A generic one gets seen by nobody and costs you
credibility with the author.
在LinkedIn上，评论是杠杆效应最高的行为，同时也是最容易做砸的事。一条获得400个互动的帖子下的评论，触达人数比你自己发的大多数帖子都多。而一条泛泛的评论没人会看，还会损耗你在发帖人心中的可信度。
Input
输入
The user pastes the post text (and the author's name and role if they have
it). If they paste a screenshot, read it. If they give you a URL you cannot
open, ask them to paste the text - do not guess what the post said, and do not
use browser automation to scrape the feed.
用户粘贴帖子文本（如果有的话，也可以附上发帖人的姓名和职位）。如果用户粘贴的是截图，请识别截图内容。如果用户提供的是你无法打开的URL，请让他们粘贴文本——不要猜测帖子内容，也不要使用浏览器自动化工具抓取信息流。
The nine comment types
九种评论类型
Pick by what the post actually is. Never default to type 1.
| # | type | when | shape |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Add a datum | post makes a claim you can support with a number | "We saw the same thing: 40% of our..." |
| 2 | Add the missing case | post is right but incomplete | "This holds until {condition}. Then..." |
| 3 | Respectful disagree | you genuinely think it is wrong | name the agreement first, then the fork |
| 4 | Extend one line | one sentence in the post is the good one | quote it, then build on it |
| 5 | Ask the real question | post skipped the hard part | one question, specific, no "curious to hear" |
| 6 | The receipt | you have done the thing they described | what happened, in two sentences |
| 7 | The correction | there is a factual error | be right, be brief, be kind, be sure |
| 8 | The reframe | the post has the right facts and the wrong frame | "Another way to read this:" |
| 9 | The one-liner | the post needs nothing, you want presence | under 12 words, must be funny or true |
根据帖子的实际内容选择类型，永远不要默认使用第1种。
| 序号 | 类型 | 适用场景 | 句式模板 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 补充数据 | 帖子提出的观点可以用数据支撑 | “我们也发现了同样的情况：我们的40%……” |
| 2 | 补充遗漏场景 | 帖子观点正确但不全面 | “这一点在{条件}下成立，一旦……” |
| 3 | 友好反驳 | 你真心认为观点有误 | 先认同共识部分，再提出分歧 |
| 4 | 延伸单句观点 | 帖子中有某一句话很有价值 | 引用这句话，再展开延伸 |
| 5 | 提出核心问题 | 帖子回避了最难的部分 | 一个具体的问题，不要说“想听听大家的看法”之类的套话 |
| 6 | 亲身实证 | 你亲身做过帖子里提到的事 | 用两句话说明发生了什么 |
| 7 | 事实纠错 | 帖子存在事实错误 | 准确、简洁、友善、有把握 |
| 8 | 重构视角 | 帖子事实正确但解读角度有问题 | “另一种解读方式是：” |
| 9 | 一句话评论 | 帖子不需要额外补充，你只想刷存在感 | 12词以内，必须有趣或真实 |
Rules
规则
- 2 to 4 sentences. Longer reads as a hijack. Shorter reads as filler.
- Never open with "Great post", "Love this", "So true", "Couldn't agree more", "This resonates", or the author's first name followed by an exclamation mark. All six are invisible.
- No emoji openers. No 🔥 or 👏 as a first character.
- Never restate the post. The author knows what they wrote and so does everyone reading.
- One idea. A comment with two points reads as a blog attempt.
- Say the specific thing. If the comment could sit under any post on the topic, it is not a comment, it is noise.
- Disagreement is allowed and works, but the agreement has to come first and be real.
- 2到4句话。 太长会显得像抢戏，太短又像凑数。
- 永远不要以“很棒的帖子”“太喜欢了”“太对了”“完全同意”“太有共鸣了”开头，也不要用发帖人的名字加感叹号开头。 这六种开头完全没人会注意到。
- 不要用表情开头。 不要把🔥或👏放在第一个字符。
- 永远不要复述帖子内容。 发帖人知道自己写了什么，看帖子的人也知道。
- 只讲一个观点。 包含两个论点的评论会让人觉得你在写博客。
- 说具体的内容。 如果一条评论放在该主题下的任何帖子下面都适用，那它不是评论，是噪音。
- 可以提出不同意见，而且效果很好，但必须先表达认同，而且是真心的认同。
Output
输出
Give two options of different types, labelled, plus a one-line reason for
the one you would post. Run both through first - a comment with an
em dash in it is more obviously machine-written than a post, because comments
are short and people read them closely.
/li-humanCOMMENT OPTIONS (on @author's post about hiring)
[6 · Receipt]
We tried the no-resume version of this for 3 hires last year. Two were the
best hires we made. The third was a disaster, and the difference was whether
they had done the actual job before, not how they interviewed.
[3 · Respectful disagree]
Agree on the signal problem. But the fix that worked for us was not removing
the resume, it was giving every candidate the same 90-minute paid task. Same
outcome, far less argument internally.
Post the first. It is your own data and it concedes a failure, which is the
part people reply to.提供两种不同类型的评论选项，标注类型，再加上一行说明你更推荐发布哪一条的理由。两条评论都要先经过检查——带破折号的评论比帖子更容易被看出是机器生成的，因为评论很短，人们会仔细读。
/li-humanCOMMENT OPTIONS (on @author's post about hiring)
[6 · Receipt]
We tried the no-resume version of this for 3 hires last year. Two were the
best hires we made. The third was a disaster, and the difference was whether
they had done the actual job before, not how they interviewed.
[3 · Respectful disagree]
Agree on the signal problem. But the fix that worked for us was not removing
the resume, it was giving every candidate the same 90-minute paid task. Same
outcome, far less argument internally.
Post the first. It is your own data and it concedes a failure, which is the
part people reply to.Batch mode
批量模式
If the user wants an engagement round, ask for the 5-10 posts as pasted text
in one message, return one comment each in a single block, and keep a running
note of who they have already commented on this week in
. Commenting on the same three people every day is
visible and it looks like what it is.
~/.claude/linkedin/log.md如果用户需要做一轮互动，让他们把5-10条帖子的文本粘贴在同一条消息里，返回每条帖子对应的一条评论，放在同一个区块中，同时在中持续记录本周他们已经评论过的用户。每天都给同样的三个人评论很容易被看出来，而且意图太明显。
~/.claude/linkedin/log.mdNever
禁止行为
Do not auto-post. Do not use a browser tool to publish comments on the user's
behalf. Automated posting and scraping both violate LinkedIn's User Agreement
and put the account at risk. This skill writes the comment. The user posts it.
不要自动发布。不要使用浏览器工具代表用户发布评论。自动发布和抓取都违反LinkedIn的用户协议，会给账号带来风险。本技能仅负责撰写评论，由用户自行发布。