Loading...
Loading...
Write comments on other people's LinkedIn posts that read as a person with an opinion, not a bot. Use when the user pastes a post and wants a comment, says "comment on this", "engage with this", "what do I say here", or wants a batch of comments for their engagement round.
npx skill4agent add jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill li-comment| # | type | when | shape |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Add a datum | post makes a claim you can support with a number | "We saw the same thing: 40% of our..." |
| 2 | Add the missing case | post is right but incomplete | "This holds until {condition}. Then..." |
| 3 | Respectful disagree | you genuinely think it is wrong | name the agreement first, then the fork |
| 4 | Extend one line | one sentence in the post is the good one | quote it, then build on it |
| 5 | Ask the real question | post skipped the hard part | one question, specific, no "curious to hear" |
| 6 | The receipt | you have done the thing they described | what happened, in two sentences |
| 7 | The correction | there is a factual error | be right, be brief, be kind, be sure |
| 8 | The reframe | the post has the right facts and the wrong frame | "Another way to read this:" |
| 9 | The one-liner | the post needs nothing, you want presence | under 12 words, must be funny or true |
/li-humanCOMMENT OPTIONS (on @author's post about hiring)
[6 · Receipt]
We tried the no-resume version of this for 3 hires last year. Two were the
best hires we made. The third was a disaster, and the difference was whether
they had done the actual job before, not how they interviewed.
[3 · Respectful disagree]
Agree on the signal problem. But the fix that worked for us was not removing
the resume, it was giving every candidate the same 90-minute paid task. Same
outcome, far less argument internally.
Post the first. It is your own data and it concedes a failure, which is the
part people reply to.~/.claude/linkedin/log.md