assumption-mapping

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Surface, prioritize, and track risky assumptions before investing significant effort. Use when starting a new project, before major feature work, when feeling uncertain about direction, when the user says "I think users want...", "we assume...", "probably...", or before any build decision that hasn't been validated with real users.

1installs

Sourceabhsin/designskills

Added on2026-02-27

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add abhsin/designskills assumption-mapping

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Assumption Mapping

Surface hidden assumptions and prioritize which ones to validate before building.

When to Trigger

User is starting something new
User expresses uncertainty ("I think...", "probably...", "should work...")
User is about to invest significant effort
User mentions building without mentioning validation
User asks "what should I test first?"

Quick Start

Ask the user:

"What are you building and for whom?"
"What needs to be true for this to succeed?"

Then run the assumption extraction workflow below.

Core Workflow

Assumption Mapping Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Extract assumptions from conversation
- [ ] Step 2: Categorize by type
- [ ] Step 3: Score risk and uncertainty
- [ ] Step 4: Prioritize for validation
- [ ] Step 5: Suggest validation methods

Step 1: Extract Assumptions

Listen for assumption signals in what the user says:

Signal phrase	Hidden assumption
"Users want..."	Desirability assumption
"We can build..."	Feasibility assumption
"People will pay..."	Viability assumption
"It's easy to..."	Complexity assumption
"Everyone knows..."	Knowledge assumption
"They'll figure out..."	Usability assumption

Extract 5-10 assumptions. Frame each as a testable statement:

Bad: "Users like simple things" Good: "Users will complete onboarding in under 2 minutes without help"

Step 2: Categorize Assumptions

Assign each assumption to one category:

Category	Question it answers
Desirability	Do people want this?
Feasibility	Can we build this?
Viability	Can this sustain itself?
Usability	Can people use this?
Ethical	Should we build this?

Step 3: Score Each Assumption

Rate each assumption on two dimensions (1-5 scale):

Impact: If wrong, how badly does it hurt the project?

1 = Minor inconvenience
5 = Project fails completely

Uncertainty: How confident are we this is true?

1 = We have strong evidence
5 = Pure guess

Step 4: Prioritize

Create a 2x2 priority matrix:

                    HIGH IMPACT
                         │
     ┌───────────────────┼───────────────────┐
     │                   │                   │
     │   VALIDATE LATER  │  VALIDATE FIRST   │
     │   (Low risk)      │  (Critical)       │
     │                   │                   │
LOW  ├───────────────────┼───────────────────┤ HIGH
UNCERTAINTY              │              UNCERTAINTY
     │                   │                   │
     │   SKIP            │  MONITOR          │
     │   (Safe)          │  (Watch for       │
     │                   │   signals)        │
     │                   │                   │
     └───────────────────┼───────────────────┘
                         │
                    LOW IMPACT

Top-right quadrant = validate before building

Step 5: Suggest Validation Methods

For each critical assumption, suggest a lightweight validation:

Assumption type	Fast validation (hours)	Deeper validation (days)
Desirability	5 user interviews	Landing page test
Feasibility	Technical spike	Prototype
Viability	Competitor pricing research	Willingness-to-pay interviews
Usability	3-person hallway test	Usability study

See references/validation-methods.md for detailed methods.

Output Template

Automatically save the output to
design/03-assumption-mapping.md
using the Write tool while presenting findings in this format:

markdown

## Assumption Map for [Project Name]

### Critical Assumptions (Validate First)
| # | Assumption | Type | Impact | Uncertainty | Suggested Test |
|---|------------|------|--------|-------------|----------------|
| 1 | [statement] | [type] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [method] |

### Secondary Assumptions (Validate Later)
[Same table format]

### Safe Assumptions (Monitor)
[Bulleted list]

### Recommended Next Steps
1. [First validation to run]
2. [Second validation to run]

Adaptive Behavior

If user is new to assumption mapping:

Explain briefly why we do this (1 sentence)
Guide them through extraction with examples
Keep the output simple

If user is familiar:

Skip explanations
Jump to extraction
Offer the full matrix output

Gauge familiarity by asking: "Have you mapped assumptions before, or should I walk you through it?"

Handoff

Suggest next steps:

"Use this map to prioritize validation tests before full development. Want to proceed with
/solution-scoping
or test critical assumptions first?"

Note: File is automatically saved to

design/03-assumption-mapping.md

for context preservation.

Integration Points

This skill works well before:

```
problem-framing
```
— if problem isn't clear yet
```
validation
```
— to test the critical assumptions identified here
```
ideation
```
— to generate solutions once assumptions are validated

References

references/validation-methods.md — Detailed validation techniques
references/examples.md — Complete worked examples