Loading...
Loading...
Found 62 Skills
Walk through decisions using a 3-part framework (first-principles, cost/benefit, second-order effects). Use when choosing between options, evaluating trade-offs, or making high-stakes decisions.
MUST USE when designing ClickHouse architectures, selecting between ingestion or modeling patterns, or translating best practices into workload-specific system designs. Complements clickhouse-best-practices with decision frameworks and explicit provenance labels.
/em -challenge — Pre-Mortem Plan Analysis
Multidisciplinary decision-making using mental models from psychology, economics, mathematics, and science to identify high-conviction opportunities and avoid cognitive biases. Keywords: latticework, lollapalooza, circle of competence, inversion, moats. NOT for single-discipline analysis, high-frequency trading, or speculative diversification.
Fast lookup table for 32+ SaaS finance metrics with formulas, benchmarks, and when to use each. Includes red flags and decision frameworks.
Structured comparison of competing options with weighted scoring matrices, trade-off analysis, decision frameworks, and recommendation templates. Use when evaluating alternatives, making purchase decisions, or comparing strategies.
Synthesize supply-side and demand-side evidence into a practical sourcing judgment for a product, niche, or shortlist without collapsing platform data collection and business judgment into one step.
Before heavy deliberation, classify the decision as cheap or costly to undo; decide two-way doors fast and stage one-way doors to preserve options.
Make rational and objective decisions using a four-step process: Focus on goals to filter trivial matters → Find a third option to break through option limitations → Avoid cognitive biases → Quantify and score to make the final choice. Suitable for scenarios where you are struggling with major decisions, options seem to be mutually exclusive, or you worry about being misled by intuition. Not applicable to daily low-risk small decisions (over-quantification is a waste of time). Key trigger signals: "Torn between choosing A or B", "Don't know how to choose", "Not satisfied with either but have to pick one", "Help me make a decision".
Use when one agent is implementing code and another agent must review the resulting changes, compare the summary against the actual files, decide whether to fix now or move on, and write the next tightly scoped prompt with context handoff guidance.
Use when debates are trapped in false dichotomies, polarized positions need charitable interpretation, tradeoffs are obscured by binary framing, synthesis beyond 'pick one side' is needed, or when users mention steelman arguments, thesis-antithesis-synthesis, Hegelian dialectic, third way solutions, or resolving seemingly opposed principles.
Operate consensus.tools end-to-end (post jobs, create submissions, cast votes, resolve results) using either a local-first board or a hosted board (depending on how you run it). Hosted boards are optional and coming soon.