Loading...
Loading...
Found 42 Skills
Provides file paths to language-specific reference files for the test ANALYSIS skills (assertion-quality, test-anti-patterns, test-gap-analysis, test-smell-detection, test-tagging). Call this skill to discover available extension files (e.g., dotnet.md for .NET/MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit, python.md for pytest/unittest, typescript.md for Jest/Vitest/Mocha, java.md for JUnit/TestNG, etc.). Do not use directly — invoked by the test-quality-auditor agent and polyglot analysis skills that need framework-specific lookup tables (test markers, assertion APIs, skip annotations, sleep patterns, mystery guest indicators, integration markers, setup/teardown, tag-support capability).
Grades a specified set of test methods individually and produces a concise table mapping each test (fully-qualified name) to a letter grade (A–F), a score band, and a one-line note — designed to be posted as a PR comment. Use when the caller wants per-test feedback on a curated list of methods (for example, the new or modified tests in a pull request), not a suite-wide audit. Polyglot: .NET, Python, TS/JS, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, C++. Input is a list of test methods (or method bodies / file+line spans); output is a compact markdown table plus a short summary. DO NOT USE FOR: full suite audits (use test-quality-auditor agent or test-anti-patterns), writing new tests (use code-testing-generator agent or writing-mstest-tests), fixing failures, or measuring code coverage.
Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.
Generic test writing discipline: test quality, real assertions, anti-patterns, and rationalization resistance. Use when writing tests, adding test coverage, or fixing failing tests for any language or framework. Complements language-specific skills.
Test-driven development with Kent Beck's canonical 5-step workflow: Test List, Write Test, Make Pass, Refactor, Repeat. Strict vertical-slice cycles with automatic project detection. Use when the user asks to "write tests first", "use TDD", "red-green-refactor", "test-driven development", "build a feature with TDD", "fix a bug with TDD", wants test-first development for any language or framework, or mentions "tracer bullet" or "vertical slice".
Verification-ladder R5 review dimension: the mutation-adequacy adequacy backstop. Runs the diff-scoped mutation gate, reads the carrier, and turns surviving / NoCoverage mutants into concrete 'write a test that kills <file>:<line>' follow-ups. Triggers: 'mutation adequacy', 'check mutation score', or /review on a HIGH-tier feature. The mutation SCORE is advisory by default (a config override is needed to block on it). The NoCoverage axis has its own real, functioning block-mode enforcement path under review.mutationEnforcement: block (default budget: 0 uncovered changed lines) — opt-in, same as the score's severity. The diff-scoped CI wiring runs in observe mode unconditionally pending a clean runner verdict; it is not yet a blocking CI backstop. Do NOT run full-tree mutation here (scope:'full' is deferred to R10/v2.12).
Test suite analysis. Use when asked to analyze, review, or evaluate a project's tests for quality, coverage gaps, and best practices.
Use when reviewing or scoring AI-generated unit tests/UT code, especially when coverage, assertion effectiveness, or test quality is in question and a numeric score, risk level, or must-fix checklist is needed
Detects common LLM coding agent artifacts in codebases. Identifies test quality issues, dead code, over-abstraction, and verbose LLM style patterns. Use when cleaning up AI-generated code or reviewing for agent-introduced cruft.
Use this skill when you need to review test cases for completeness, clarity, maintainability, and missing scenarios; triggers include 'test case review' and 'test case review'.
Validate test effectiveness with mutation testing using Stryker (TypeScript/JavaScript) and mutmut (Python). Find weak tests that pass despite code mutations. Use to improve test quality.
Identify and fix common testing mistakes across unit, integration, and E2E test suites. Use when tests are flaky, brittle, over-mocked, order-dependent, slow, poorly named, or providing false confidence. Use for "test smell", "fragile test", "flaky test", "over-mocking", "test anti-pattern", or "skipped tests". Do NOT use for writing new tests from scratch (use test-driven-development), refactoring architecture (use systematic-refactoring), or performance profiling without a specific test quality symptom.