Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,934 Skills
MindOS is the user's local knowledge assistant and shared knowledge base. It keeps decisions, meeting notes, SOPs, debugging lessons, architecture choices, research findings, and preferences available across sessions and agents. 更新笔记, 搜索知识库, 整理文件, 执行SOP/工作流, 复盘, 追加CSV, 跨Agent交接, 路由非结构化输入到对应文件, 提炼经验, 同步关联文档. NOT for editing app source, project docs, or paths outside the KB. Core concepts: Space, Instruction (INSTRUCTION.md), Skill (SKILL.md); notes can embody both. Trigger on: save or record anything, search for prior notes or context, update or edit a file, organize notes, run a workflow or SOP, capture decisions, append rows to a table or CSV, hand off context to another agent, check if something was discussed before, look up a past decision, distill lessons learned, prepare context for a meeting, quick-capture to staging area, organize inbox, check knowledge health, detect conflicts or contradictions, find stale content. Chinese triggers: 帮我记下来, 搜一下笔记, 更新知识库, 整理文件, 复盘, 提炼经验, 保存, 记录, 交接, 查一下之前的, 有没有相关笔记, 把这个存起来, 放到暂存台, 整理暂存台, 知识健康检查, 检测知识冲突. Proactive behavior — do not wait for the user to mention MindOS: (1) When user's question implies stored context may exist (past decisions, previous discussions, meeting records) → search MindOS first, even if they don't explicitly mention it. (2) After completing valuable work (bug fixed, decision made, lesson learned, architecture chosen, meeting summarized) → offer to save it to MindOS for future reference. (3) After a long or multi-topic conversation → suggest persisting key decisions and context.
Apply mechanism design (reverse game theory) to engineer incentive-compatible rules for allocation problems. Use this skill when the user needs to design auctions, voting systems, or matching markets, or when evaluating whether a proposed mechanism satisfies incentive compatibility and individual rationality constraints.
Evaluate source credibility using primary/secondary classification, internal/external criticism, triangulation, and misinformation detection. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether information is trustworthy, evaluate research sources, fact-check claims, or detect misinformation — even if they say 'can I trust this source', 'is this real', 'how reliable is this data', or 'fact-check this for me'.
Apply IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method for structured legal analysis. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze a legal question systematically, write a legal memo, evaluate whether a law applies to a situation, or structure a legal argument — even if they say 'does this law apply', 'analyze this legal issue', or 'write a legal analysis'.
Apply the Efficient Market Hypothesis (Fama, 1970) to evaluate information incorporation in asset prices across weak, semi-strong, and strong forms. Use this skill when the user needs to assess market efficiency, determine if a trading strategy can generate abnormal returns, evaluate event studies, or when they ask 'can technical analysis work', 'does the market already know this', or 'is this anomaly exploitable'.
Develop e-commerce strategy for Southeast Asian markets including platform selection, payment infrastructure, logistics challenges, and localization requirements. Use this skill when the user is expanding e-commerce to SEA, evaluating Shopee vs Lazada vs Tokopedia, or needs to understand SEA market differences — even if they say 'sell to Southeast Asia', 'which platform in Vietnam', 'SEA payment methods', or 'cross-border e-commerce in ASEAN'.
Apply the Resource-Based View (Barney, 1991) and VRIO framework to evaluate whether a firm's resources and capabilities confer sustained competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to assess internal resources for strategic value, determine if a competitive edge is sustainable, audit resource portfolios for VRIO criteria, or when they ask 'what makes our advantage sustainable', 'which resources matter most', or 'can competitors replicate this'.
Apply causal inference methods — counterfactual framework, instrumental variables, propensity score matching, and difference-in-differences — to estimate causal effects from observational data. Use this skill when the user needs to determine if X caused Y from non-experimental data, evaluate program/policy impact without a randomized trial, or control for confounders — even if they say 'did this change cause the improvement', 'how do we measure the impact without an experiment', or 'is this correlation or causation'.
Apply basic game theory concepts including Nash equilibrium, dominant strategies, and the Prisoner's Dilemma to analyze strategic interactions. Use this skill when the user needs to model competitive decisions, predict rival behavior, design incentive mechanisms, or evaluate cooperation vs competition scenarios — even if they say 'what will our competitor do', 'should we cooperate or compete', or 'how do we set up the right incentives'.
Apply Moore's business ecosystem framework to analyze how firms co-evolve through four stages (birth, expansion, authority, renewal) and occupy different ecosystem roles. Use this skill when the user needs to map ecosystem dynamics in a platform or industry, evaluate keystone vs dominator strategies, assess ecosystem health, or when they ask 'what stage is this ecosystem in', 'how should we position in this ecosystem', or 'why is this ecosystem declining despite having a dominant player'.
Analyze financial health using ratio categories: profitability, liquidity, leverage, efficiency, and valuation. Use this skill when the user needs to assess a company's financial performance, compare companies, evaluate creditworthiness, or prepare financial due diligence — even if they say 'is this company financially healthy', 'analyze these financial statements', or 'compare these two companies'.
Optimize Amazon PPC campaigns by identifying and managing negative keywords. Reduce wasted ad spend by eliminating irrelevant search terms while protecting valuable converting terms.