Loading...
Loading...
Found 109 Skills
Use when the user needs to turn a real software engineering / computer science project and an existing thesis draft into a submission-ready undergraduate thesis manuscript. Trigger for requests such as "根据项目把论文改成定稿", "按学校模板排版成最终版", "复制初稿后生成定稿 Word", "为定稿降查重", "根据PaperPass报告降AIGC", "继续在手改初稿上改", "恢复原来的图表和数据库说明", or when academic-paper-strategist has already produced an evidence-backed rewrite plan. Outputs a cleaned manuscript, final DOCX workflow, and a separate rework report.
11 latex skills. Trigger: LaTeX typesetting, formatting papers, mathematical notation, Beamer. Design: template-based guides with package recommendations and compilation tips.
Comprehensive academic writing skill for drafting journal-ready manuscripts. Orchestrates specialized sub-skills for introduction sections (q-intro), descriptive analysis (q-descriptive-analysis), methods sections (q-methods), and results sections (q-results). Use when the user needs end-to-end support for academic manuscript preparation, from initial data exploration through publication-ready prose. Follows APA 7th edition formatting standards.
Identify your article's contribution type and generate a cross-section vocabulary threading template. Feeds into argument-builder, article-bookends, and abstract-builder for consistent framing across all sections. Based on analysis of 197 articles from AJS, ASR, Social Problems, Social Forces, Social Movement Studies, and Mobilization.
Guides writing effective rebuttals after receiving peer review feedback. Covers review diagnosis (score-driven color-coding), response strategy (champion identification, common-theme consolidation), tactical writing (18 rules), and counterintuitive rebuttal principles. Use when: user received reviewer scores/comments, needs to write a rebuttal or author response, wants to respond to specific criticism (e.g. 'limited novelty', 'missing baselines'), mentions 'rebuttal', 'reviewer comments', 'author response', or 'respond to reviewers'. Do NOT use for pre-submission self-review (use paper-review instead).
Write and revise ML, CV, NLP, and systems research papers with strong claim-evidence flow. Use when drafting an abstract, introduction, related work, method, experiments, ablations, discussion, or rebuttal; structuring figures and tables; tightening reviewer-facing logic; or preparing a paper for submission. Triggers on: research paper, paper writing, academic writing, ML paper, CVPR paper, NeurIPS paper, ICLR paper, experiments section, rebuttal, abstract rewrite, contribution framing, reviewer response.
Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with web/DBLP/arXiv lookup to catch hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations (cite present but the cited paper does not establish the claim). Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.
Use when the user needs to plan, de-risk, or ground a software engineering / computer science undergraduate thesis from a real codebase before final writing. Trigger for requests such as "根据项目写毕业论文", "先做论文大纲", "用真实项目材料规划论文", "检查论文是否脱离代码", "根据检测报告降查重", "根据AIGC报告改写定稿", "继续在手改初稿上改", or when an existing draft thesis must be reworked against a school format sample. Produces an evidence-backed outline, chapter rewrite plan, figure plan, and handoff package for academic-paper-composer.
Help a researcher plan a paper submission to an academic conference, from target selection through submission day. Use this skill whenever the user is thinking about submitting to a conference (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, ICLR, ACL, CHI, etc.), asks about submission timelines, wants to know if their work is ready, wants to do a pre-submission strategy review, or mentions a specific submission deadline. Trigger on phrases like "submit to NeurIPS", "paper deadline", "T-6 months", "submission strategy", "is my paper ready", "conference deadline", or whenever the user is choosing a target venue or building a submission timeline. Also trigger when the user is deciding between venues or considering whether to submit vs. continue developing the work.
Specialized workflows for drafting, refining, and responding to academic literature reviews and peer review feedback. Use this skill for literature review outlines, research-gap synthesis, reviewer rebuttals, response letters, and academic writing tone repair.
Survey Writer — Responsible for writing each section of survey papers according to templates. Activated when assigned by research supervisors or paper analysts. Based on paper analysis cards and comparison tables, write complete survey papers in accordance with academic writing standards.
Polish paper for Q1 journal submission (ISI/Scopus). Use after paper draft is complete — handles notation sync with thesis, De-AI/De-translation protocol, and Q1 results table standards.