Loading...
Loading...
Found 995 Skills
Use when setting up Commet webhook endpoints, verifying signatures, handling billing events (subscription.created, subscription.activated, subscription.canceled, subscription.updated, payment.received, payment.failed, invoice.created), or building event-driven billing workflows.
Verify and validate JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) by checking signatures, expiration, claims, and structure. Use when the user wants to verify, validate, or check a JWT — e.g. "verify this token", "is this JWT valid", "check the signature", "validate this token against my JWKS", "is this token expired". Supports HMAC, RSA, and ECDSA with secrets, PEM keys, or JWKS endpoints.
Check Nowledge Mem connection status, server version, CLI version, and configuration. Use when diagnosing issues or verifying setup.
Review the operating health of a one-person company using lightweight metrics, bottleneck analysis, and stop-loss logic. Use when Codex needs to explain review concepts when needed, verify available outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple bottleneck hypotheses, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
Design a viable business model for a one-person company using Lean Canvas and a simplified Business Model Canvas. Use when Codex needs to explain the business-model concepts when needed, verify niche and value-proposition prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple model choices, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
Use after run-plan completes to independently verify the implementation. Reads only the plan document and inspects the codebase from scratch — information-isolated from the execution context. Produces a structured review document with PASS/FAIL verdict. Triggers when the user says "review the work", "verify the implementation", "check if the plan was executed correctly".
Read-only drift detector. Diffs SPEC.md against current code and reports violations grouped by severity. Writes nothing — suggests remedies via the spec or build skills but never invokes them. Triggers when the user asks to check drift, audit the spec, verify invariants, or ask whether code still matches the spec. Phrasings: "check drift", "audit the spec", "does the code still match §V", "check invariants", "spec vs code".
NCU-driven iterative optimization workflow for CUDA/CUTLASS/Triton/CuTe DSL kernels. MANDATORY: every optimization MUST start with NCU profiling, followed by multi-dimensional analysis, then targeted code modification, then re-profiling to verify. Supports roofline, memory hierarchy, warp stalls, instruction mix, occupancy, divergence analysis. Provides implementation-specific code modifications: Native CUDA (launch config, memory patterns, async copy, Tensor Core), CUTLASS (ThreadblockShape, stages, epilogue, schedule policy, alignment), Triton (autotune params, compiler hints, tl.* API patterns), CuTe DSL (threads_per_cta, elems_per_thread, tiled_copy, copy atom, shared memory, warp/cta reduce). Use when optimizing any CUDA kernel performance.
Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (Codex GPT-5.4 xhigh), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.
Pre-submission checklist for LaTeX academic papers. Use when the user wants to submit a paper, check submission readiness, prepare camera-ready, switch to final mode, or verify a paper is ready for a conference deadline.
Structured workflow for fact-checking claims in journalism. Use when verifying statements for publication, rating claims for fact-check articles, or building pre-publication verification processes. Includes claim extraction, evidence gathering, rating scales, and correction protocols.
Audit a python-pptx export against its source HTML deck, identify layout/content drift (footer overflow, cropped content, missing italic/em, lost styling, off-rhythm spacing), and re-export with strict footer-rail + cursor-flow layout discipline. Use this skill whenever the user has a .pptx that was generated from an HTML slide deck and asks to compare/audit/verify/fix the export — including phrases like "compare ppt with html", "fidelity audit", "fix the pptx", "ppt is cut off", "footer overlap", "italic missing in pptx", "re-export the deck", "pptx-html-fidelity-audit", or any case where a python-pptx → HTML round-trip needs verification or repair. Also trigger when the user shows you a deck.html and a deck.pptx side by side and is debugging visual differences.