Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,283 Skills
Guidance for receiving and responding to code review feedback. Use when addressing PR review comments, incorporating reviewer suggestions, or managing review discussions.
Clean Code principles (DRY, KISS, YAGNI), naming conventions, function design, and refactoring. Use when user says "clean this code", "refactor", "improve readability", or when reviewing code quality.
Run /check before merge to confirm a change is sound. Two modes: `/check verify` drives the real app and proves behavior against the spec (every acceptance criterion met, every specced surface built); `/check review` runs a senior code review on a different model than wrote the code. Verify after /develop, review before a PR. Writes findings to docs/reviews/; never edits your code.
Audit animation code for correct timing function selection. Use when reviewing motion implementations, debugging animations that feel wrong, or choosing between springs and easing. Outputs file:line findings.
Critical rules and common mistakes to avoid in Convex development. Use when reviewing Convex code, debugging issues, or learning what NOT to do. Activates for code review, debugging OCC errors, fixing type errors, or understanding why code fails in Convex.
Opinionated constraints for writing maintainable, testable code. Apply MTE principles, avoid over-engineering, guide refactoring, and provide code review checklists. Use when users write code, refactor, or need code review. Triggers on keywords like "code quality", "refactor", "review", "MTE", "代码质量", "重构", "审查".
Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness. Use when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or providing feedback on implementations. Focuses on API design, patterns, and actionable feedback.
Code quality specialist: architecture patterns, refactoring, code review, development practices. 23 methodologies.
[Fix & Debug] ⚡ Analyze logs and fix issues
Use when user asks to leverage claude or claude code to do something (e.g. implement a feature design or review codes, etc). Provides non-interactive automation mode for hands-off task execution without approval prompts.
Process and implement code review feedback systematically. Use when user provides reviewer comments, PR feedback, code review notes, or asks to implement suggestions from reviews.
Standardized output format for code reviews with severity labels, file:line references, and fix code snippets. Use when generating review reports that need consistent, actionable feedback structure.