Loading...
Loading...
Found 523 Skills
Build a Stockbee-style setup model book from momentum-burst screener candidates, then update 3-day and 5-day forward outcomes with MFE/MAE, stop-hit status, outcome tags, and cohort statistics. Use when the user wants to study Stockbee Momentum Burst examples, track failed candidates, build setup fluency, review A/B setup quality, or convert screener outputs into a learning loop rather than immediate trade signals.
Build enriched prospect lists from ICP criteria - find targets, enrich contacts, score accounts, detect trigger signals
Input your best customers and find 100+ companies that match the profile. Uses firmographic data, tech stack, growth signals, and similarity scoring to identify ideal prospects. Use when building target account lists or expanding to new markets.
Abstract detector tickets and hints into reusable edge concepts with thesis, invalidation signals, and strategy playbooks before strategy design/export.
Join the Degenerate Claw perpetuals trading competition for ACP agents. Trade perps, join the leaderboard, post trading signals, subscribe to agent forums, and interact with the Degenerate Claw platform.
Research Google Trends search-intent signals for topic discovery, keyword momentum, regional interest, and rising queries without treating search trends as the same thing as platform content heat or marketplace demand.
Assess chemical and drug toxicity via adverse outcome pathways, real-world adverse event signals, and toxicogenomic evidence. Integrates AOPWiki (AOPWiki_list_aops, AOPWiki_get_aop) for mechanism- level pathway tracing, FAERS for post-market adverse event quantification, OpenFDA for label mining, and CTD for chemical-gene-disease evidence. Produces structured toxicity reports with evidence grading (T1-T4). Use when asked about toxicity mechanisms, adverse outcome pathways, AOP mapping, FAERS signal detection, or chemical-disease relationships for drugs or environmental chemicals.
Decision-grade entity research skill — produces a hypothesis-tested dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org, not a generic profile. Forcing intake makes the user state their hypothesis upfront (what they already believe and want to verify or disprove) so the dossier tests it rather than confirms it. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict on the hypothesis, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network signals, reputation signals, red flags, 3-5 conversation hooks tied to specific findings, and source-provenance audit log. Uses WebSearch + WebFetch + free APIs (SEC EDGAR, GitHub, ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer) as workhorses; optional BYOK MCPs (LinkedIn, Crunchbase, Apollo, Pitchbook, SimilarWeb) enhance coverage. Triggers: 'research [company]', 'dossier on [person/company]', 'background check on [entity]', 'prep me for a meeting with [person/company]', 'due diligence on [company]', 'what should I know about [entity]', 'research [person] before I [meet/hire/invest]', 'competitor research on [company]', 'investor diligence [company]', 'interview prep for [company]'. Honors sensitivity exclusions for journalism + personal-vetting contexts.
Identify candidate stocks with sufficient pullbacks but intact trends and acceptable support structures, and output observation ranges, reversal signals, and invalidation conditions. Suitable for scenarios such as bargain-hunting opportunity screening, secondary entry for strong stocks, and pullback observation for trend stocks.
Recall, search, continue, or analyze past conversations. Triggers on recall phrases ("what did we discuss", "continue where we left off", "we decided"), retrospective phrases ("do a retro", "post-mortem", "what went well", "lessons learned", "find antipatterns"), and implicit signals (past-tense references, possessives without context, assumptive questions like "do you remember").
Analyse competitor moves and surface strategic implications for your product. Use when asked to track competitor signals, analyse a competitor announcement, understand what a competitor is doing strategically, or produce a competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with threat ratings, roadmap implications, and recommended responses.
Token holder chip analysis — deep analysis of holder structure including chip distribution, entry cost, whale/dev/KOL behavior, risk wallets (rat traders, bundlers, snipers), related wallets, smart money signals, and an AI rating based purely on token structure. Use when user asks about holder analysis, 筹码分析, 持仓分析, chip structure, who is holding, or whether a token is safe to buy based on its holder composition.