Pullback Opportunity Finder Skill
Data Dependencies and Pre-execution Requirements
It is recommended to use Wind's
to obtain underlying data. Before execution, check if
is already installed locally; if not, prompt the user to install it:
bash
# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
# Gitee Mirror (Domestic)
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
Skill Positioning
This skill is used to screen candidate stocks where the core upward logic remains intact, the trend is not broken, but the price has experienced a phased pullback. The focus of the output is not to mechanically find stocks with large declines, but to identify which pullbacks are healthy consolidations and which are just downward relays before weak rebounds, thereby helping users base their "bargain-hunting" decisions on trend and structure judgments.
Function Overview
The core function of this skill is to find candidate stocks with sufficient pullbacks but intact trends, and locate bargain-hunting observation zones.
It emphasizes combining the evaluation of trend integrity, pullback depth, support signals, catalyst continuity and risk boundaries to avoid mistaking all declines for opportunities.
Application Scenarios
- After a pullback in a strong sector, need to judge which individual stocks are still worth tracking.
- Users want to find opportunities for "secondary entry" instead of chasing highs to buy.
- Trading teams need to update the bargain-hunting observation pool intraday or at the end of the day.
- Existing position holders want to distinguish between normal pullbacks and weakening trends.
Working Principles
- The premise of pullback opportunities is that the original main trend is still valid; do not look at the decline in isolation from the trend.
- Must distinguish between three pullback natures: "strong consolidation", "trend break", and "emotional clearing".
- All bargain-hunting conclusions should be accompanied by observation ranges, confirmation signals and stop-loss boundaries.
- If the pullback lacks support or the catalyst is falsified, it should be prioritized as a risk rather than an opportunity.
- The main text only presents analysis results, without explicitly describing internal implementation details.
Execution Process
Step 1: Confirm Stock Pool and Pullback Definition
First clarify which type of pullback opportunity is being sought this time:
- Technical pullback of previous leading stocks
- Quick repair opportunity for trend stocks after news shocks
- Looking for a few strong stocks that still have resilience after the sector retreats
- Or phased washing opportunity in the medium-term main uptrend
At the same time, confirm whether the user is concerned about daily, weekly or shorter-term pullbacks.
Step 2: Confirm Whether the Original Trend is Valid
For candidate stocks, first review whether the rise before the pullback has a real trend foundation:
- Whether there is a continuous strong structure rather than a pulse pull-up
- Whether there is main line support such as performance, prosperity, policies, and theme strengthening
- Whether the volume-price relationship during the rise is healthy
- Whether the stock has historically exhibited the behavior of continuing to strengthen after a pullback
If the original rise itself lacks trend quality, subsequent pullbacks should not be easily defined as opportunities.
Step 3: Evaluate Whether Pullback Depth and Rhythm are Healthy
The focus of a healthy pullback is not "falling enough", but "retreating in an orderly manner". Observe:
- Whether the pullback range is still within an acceptable range relative to the previous rise
- Whether the pullback speed is a sharp drop to clear positions, or a mild consolidation with shrinking volume
- Whether the pullback process breaks through important moving averages, platform lower edges or key lows
- Whether there is obvious uncontrolled volume increase or chip stampede during the decline
If the pullback is too deep or the rhythm is unbalanced, it should be prioritized as a risk observation rather than a bargain-hunting candidate.
Step 4: Look for Support Zones and Signals
Pullback opportunities need to be translated into specific price zones and behavioral signals. Focus on confirming:
- Which range may form effective support
- Whether there are signs of stabilization with shrinking volume, lower shadow repair or active support when pulling back to the support zone
- Whether individual stocks in the same sector show signs of stabilizing simultaneously
- If there is a rebound, whether the rebound quality shows that funds are willing to re-enter
Without support, there is only decline; just because the price is close to support does not mean the opportunity has appeared.
Step 5: Verify Whether the Catalyst is Still Valid
The key to the validity of bargain-hunting is that the original main line has not been fundamentally damaged. Re-verify:
- Whether the core narrative driving the rise is still valid
- Whether the pullback is due to phased realization rather than weakening fundamentals
- Whether there are still event windows in the future that can continue to strengthen the logic
- Whether market preferences have switched away from this style
If the catalyst has obviously become钝化 or reversed, the priority of bargain-hunting should be reduced.
Step 6: Distinguish Between "Observation Zone" and "Confirmation Point"
High-quality bargain-hunting does not mean buying when the price reaches the zone, but splitting the process into two levels:
- Observation Zone: The stock price enters a price area worthy of key monitoring
- Confirmation Point: Evidence of volume-price repair, sector resonance or renewed strength appears
At the same time, clearly write:
- Under what circumstances can the tracking level be upgraded
- Under what circumstances should the original bargain-hunting judgment be abandoned
- If the optimal position is missed, whether there is still a secondary entry opportunity
Step 7: Form Candidate Ranking and Strategy Recommendations
Rank candidates comprehensively based on "trend integrity + pullback health + support quality + catalyst continuity", and clearly distinguish:
- Pullback opportunities that can be actively observed
- Observation objects that only need to wait for confirmation
- Risk objects that seem to have sufficient pullbacks but should not be bargain-hunted
Step 8: Compile the Pullback Opportunity Draft
The final output should help users know "which stocks to wait for, where to wait, what signals to watch, and when to stop waiting". The main text only presents conclusions, evidence and observation frameworks, without showing intermediate drafts.
Output Structure
Pullback Opportunity Screening ({YYYY-MM-DD})
I. 30-Second Conclusion
- Most Worthwhile Pullback Objects: {Name List}
- Healthiest Pullback Type Currently: {Mild Consolidation / Quick Clearing / Platform Pullback}
- Overall Strategy Tendency: {Actively Wait for Confirmation / Only Observe / No Bargain-Hunting for Now}
- Biggest Risk Point: {One Sentence}
II. Overview of Candidate Pool
| Stock | Original Trend Quality | Current Pullback Nature | Support Zone | Confirmation Signal | Priority |
|---|
| {Target 1} | {Strong/Medium/Weak} | {Healthy/General/Weak} | {Range} | {Content} | {A/B/C} |
| {Target 2} | {Level} | {Nature} | {Range} | {Content} | {Level} |
III. Key Candidate Analysis
{Stock Name}
- Original Main Line: {Content}
- Reason for This Pullback: {Content}
- Support Observation Zone: {Content}
- Support Signal: {Content}
- Upgrade Confirmation Conditions: {Content}
- Invalidation Boundary: {Content}
IV. Sector and Environment Judgment
- Sector Status: {Content}
- Whether Market Style Supports Bargain-Hunting: {Content}
- Whether There is a Basis for Secondary Strengthening: {Content}
V. Observation and Response Checklist
- {Observation Point 1}
- {Observation Point 2}
- {Observation Point 3}
VI. Risk Warning
- {Risk 1}
- {Risk 2}
- {Risk 3}
Quality Requirements
- Pullback candidates must be based on the premise that the original trend is valid.
- Must provide support observation zones and confirmation signals, not just vague directions.
- Distinguish between "pullback in place" and "pullback ended".
- If the pullback has evolved into a trend break, clearly negate the bargain-hunting logic.
- The output must serve subsequent observation and discipline execution, avoiding writing as general market reviews.