Loading...
Loading...
Found 62 Skills
Enforces the discipline of thinking about tests, features, and maintainability BEFORE writing implementation code. Use when starting new classes/methods, refactoring existing code, or when asked to "think about tests first", "design for testability", "what tests do I need", "test-first approach", or "TDD thinking". Promotes simple, maintainable designs by considering testability upfront. Works with any codebase requiring test coverage and quality standards.
Scan C# source files for hard-to-test static dependencies — DateTime.Now/UtcNow, File.*, Directory.*, Environment.*, HttpClient, Console.*, Process.*, and other untestable statics. Produces a ranked report of static call sites by frequency. USE FOR: find untestable statics, scan for static dependencies, testability audit, identify hard-to-mock code, find DateTime.Now usage, detect static coupling, testability report, static analysis for testability. DO NOT USE FOR: generating wrappers (use generate-testability-wrappers), migrating code (use migrate-static-to-wrapper), general code review, or finding statics that are already behind abstractions.
Review .NET (C#/F#) code for language and runtime conventions: async/await, nullable, API versioning, IDisposable, LINQ, and testability. Language-only atomic skill; output is a findings list.
Expert DI decisions for iOS/tvOS: when DI containers add value vs overkill, choosing between injection patterns, protocol design for testability, and SwiftUI-specific injection strategies. Use when designing service layers, setting up testing infrastructure, or deciding how to wire dependencies. Trigger keywords: dependency injection, DI, constructor injection, protocol, mock, testability, container, factory, @EnvironmentObject, service locator
Decouple domain logic from infrastructure using Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters) pattern. Triggers: hexagonal, ports-adapters, infrastructure-independence, domain-isolation, testability Use when: business logic separation, infrastructure changes needed, testability critical DO NOT use when: selecting paradigms (use architecture-paradigms first), simple CRUD.
Go interface design patterns: implicit interfaces, consumer-side definition, interface compliance verification, composition, the accept-interfaces-return-structs principle, and common pitfalls. Use when designing interfaces, decoupling packages, defining contracts, reviewing interface usage, or refactoring for testability. Trigger examples: "design interface", "accept interfaces return structs", "interface compliance", "consumer-side interface", "interface composition". Do NOT use for HTTP handler patterns (use go-api-design) or general code review (use go-code-review).
MUST be used whenever fixing test coverage for a Dune app to meet the 80% line coverage hard gate. This skill finds AND fixes coverage gaps — it configures tooling, writes missing tests, covers untested paths, and refactors code for testability. It does not just report. Triggers: test coverage, fix tests, write tests, add tests, coverage fix, 80% coverage, coverage gate, missing tests, testability, vitest coverage, jest coverage.
Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for EARS documents - validates requirement syntax, PRD alignment, testability, and identifies issues requiring manual attention
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
Comprehensive guide for dependency injection (DI) in Golang. Covers why DI matters (testability, loose coupling, separation of concerns, lifecycle management), manual constructor injection, and DI library comparison (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do). Use this skill when designing service architecture, setting up dependency injection, refactoring tightly coupled code, managing singletons or service factories, or when the user asks about inversion of control, service containers, or wiring dependencies in Go.
Review, design, and refactor TensorRT-LLM PyTorch MoE code for architecture fit, clean code, maintainability, and testability. Always use for any modification, review, refactor, or design planning that touches MoE modules, including tensorrt_llm/_torch/modules/fused_moe, ConfigurableMoE, MoE backends, MoEScheduler/moe_scheduler.py, forward execution/chunking, communication strategies, EPLB, quantization/weight handling, routing, factories, MoE docs, or MoE tests. Also use when the user asks whether a MoE design follows the current architecture or whether a MoE refactor is reasonable.
Review PowerShell code for language and runtime conventions: advanced functions, parameter design, error handling, object pipeline behavior, compatibility, and testability. Language-only atomic skill; output is a findings list.