Loading...
Loading...
Found 155 Skills
Adopt multiple expert personas sequentially for complex problem analysis from diverse perspectives. Single-agent only — do NOT spawn sub-agents.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Do not use automatically, only when invoked explicitly.
Expert motion and interaction design auditor based on Emil Kowalski, Jakub Krehel, and Jhey Tompkins' techniques. Use when reviewing UI animations, transitions, hover states, or any motion design work. Provides per-designer perspectives with context-aware weighting.
Structured multi-perspective debate for important architectural decisions and complex trade-offs
Test Inertia Rails applications with RSpec or Minitest. Use when writing tests for Inertia responses, components, props, flash messages, and partial reloads.
Testing Inertia Rails responses with RSpec and Minitest: component assertions, prop matching, flash verification, deferred props, and partial reload helpers. Use when writing controller specs, request specs, or integration tests for Inertia pages. ALWAYS use matchers (render_component, have_props, have_flash), NOT direct access (inertia.component, inertia.props). CRITICAL: after POST/PATCH/DELETE with redirect, MUST call follow_redirect! before asserting flash or props — without it you're asserting against the 302, not the Inertia page. Setup: require 'inertia_rails/rspec'.
Review code changes from multiple specialist perspectives in parallel. Use when you want a thorough review of a PR, branch, or set of changes covering security, performance, correctness, edge cases, and ripple effects. Spawns parallel reviewer agents that each focus on a different lens, then synthesizes into a unified review.
Expert guidance for writing fast, maintainable Minitest tests in Rails applications. Use when writing tests, converting from RSpec, debugging test failures, improving test performance, or following testing best practices. Covers model tests, policy tests, request tests, system tests, fixtures, and TDD workflows.
Evaluate educational chapters from dual student and teacher perspectives. This skill should be used when analyzing chapter quality, identifying content gaps, or planning chapter improvements. Reads all lessons in a chapter directory and provides structured analysis with ratings, gap identification, and prioritized recommendations.
Force critical evaluation of proposals, requirements, or decisions by analyzing from multiple adversarial perspectives. Triggers on: accepting a proposal without pushback, 'sounds good', 'let's go with', design decisions with unstated tradeoffs, unchallenged assumptions, premature consensus. Invoke with /challenge-that.
Evaluate complex requests from 3 independent perspectives (Creative, Pragmatic, Comprehensive), reach consensus, then produce complete outputs. Use for architecture decisions, creative content, analysis, and any task where multiple valid approaches exist.