Loading...
Loading...
Found 112 Skills
Generate exactly one high-quality Conventional Commit message from the current Git diff. Use when Codex needs to inspect staged changes, summarize the dominant intent, and return only the final commit message with no analysis or extra text.
User-invoked interface review of a change rather than a screen: uncommitted work, the current branch, or a pull request. Resolves the change scope, expands it to the surfaces it affects, reads both sides of the diff, and classifies every finding as introduced, a regression, or pre-existing, then hands the review to better-interface for domain routing, severity, and the verdict. Covers interface quality, not correctness, tests, or security. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers on interface-review, review my branch, review my PR, review the diff, review my changes, review before pushing, design regression check, changed files interface review.
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.
Incrementally update reverse-engineering docs based on git changes since they were last generated. Reads the commit hash from .stackshift-docs-meta.json, diffs against HEAD, analyzes only the changed files, and surgically updates the affected docs. Saves time and cost compared to full regeneration.
Runs external LLM code reviews (OpenAI Codex or Google Gemini CLI) on uncommitted changes, branch diffs, or specific commits. Use when the user asks for a second opinion, external review, codex review, gemini review, or mentions /second-opinion.
Prepare a structured, scannable review checklist for a branch or diff, grouped by feature change and applying the four-pass review order (Types, Data Flow, Business Logic, Edge Cases) within each feature. Use when the user asks to "prep a review", "review order", or wants a checklist to manually walk through changes.
Automatically updates project documentation by analyzing git changes between the current branch and the last release tag. Performs git diff analysis to identify modifications, then updates README.md, CHANGELOG.md following Keep a Changelog standard, and discovers documentation folders for contextual updates. Use when preparing a release, maintaining documentation sync, or before creating a pull request. Triggers on "update docs", "update changelog", "sync documentation", "update readme", "prepare release documentation".
Re-reads code you just wrote with fresh perspective to catch bugs, errors, and issues. Use after completing a feature, fixing a bug, or any code changes. Triggers on "review my code", "fresh eyes", "check for bugs", "did I miss anything", or "sanity check".
Review only git diff for impact, regression, correctness, compatibility, and side effects. Scope-only atomic skill; output is a findings list for aggregation.
Runs a Trailmark structural review gate over a branch, pull request, fix commit, release diff, or git ref range to detect new entrypoints, new tainted paths, removed validation or authorization calls, privilege-boundary drift, blast-radius growth, complexity growth, and newly reachable sensitive sinks. Use when reviewing a PR, branch, remediation commit, or release diff where graph-level security regressions should be checked before merge.
Guide for making code reviews. Use this when asked to make code reviews, or ask to use it before committing changes.
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".