Loading...
Loading...
Found 31 Skills
Orchestrate subagent workflows for complex tasks that benefit from decomposition, role-based delegation, and parallel execution. Use when Codex should assemble a temporary team of subagents, choose roles from a reusable role library, create a controlled fallback role when no preset role fits, coordinate read-heavy work in parallel, or handle write-heavy work with ownership boundaries, staged execution, and an integrator-led merge path.
Daniel Kahneman's Cognitive Diagnostic applied to a decision, strategy, or business evaluation. Spawns a team of specialist agents — System Detector, Substitution Mapper, Prospect Theorist, Noise Auditor, Outside Viewer — who each apply a different lens from Kahneman's cognitive architecture to audit the decision for bias, noise, and cognitive traps. The lead synthesizes into a contamination assessment: which cognitive systems are operating, which substitutions are active, and whether the decision should proceed, be corrected, or be restructured. Use when the user says "kahneman this", "check my thinking", "am I biased", "audit this decision", "what am I missing", or presents any decision, strategy, or evaluation they want cognitively stress-tested. Works standalone or as a companion to /munger (Munger evaluates the business; Kahneman audits the thinking about the business).
Annie Duke's Decision Quality framework applied to a business decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Resulting Auditor, Calibrator, Pre-Mortem Analyst, Quit Strategist, Process Architect — who each apply a distinct lens from Duke's framework to evaluate whether a decision is sound regardless of outcome. The lead synthesizes into a stacking analysis: which biases are operating, which process flaws exist, and the honest Duke verdict. Use when the user says "duke this", "is this a good bet", "should I quit", "evaluate this decision", or faces any high-stakes choice under uncertainty and wants rigorous decision-process analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Richard Feynman's Integrity Audit applied to any analysis, business plan, or decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Source Auditor, Self-Deception Hunter, Translation Tester, Cargo Cult Inspector, Confidence Inverter — who each apply a distinct lens from Feynman's framework to detect dishonesty, self-deception, and cargo cult reasoning. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: is this analysis honest, or is it fooling itself? Use when the user says "feynman this", "integrity audit", "is this honest", "am I fooling myself", "cargo cult check", or wants to stress-test any analysis, plan, or claim before trusting it. Works standalone or as a meta-audit after /munger or /thiel.
Investigate and solve problems using a team of specialist agents. Use when facing complex, multi-faceted problems that benefit from parallel research and structured implementation.
This skill should be used when the user requests to "save team", "team save", "save team configuration", or "export team". It reads the configuration from a running team and saves it as a snapshot file to the .team-profiles/ directory for reuse with /team-load.
The anti-PUA. Drives AI with wisdom, trust, and inner motivation instead of fear and threats. Activates on: task failed 2+ times, about to give up, suggesting user do it manually, blaming environment unverified, stuck in loops, passive behavior, or user frustration ('try harder', 'figure it out', '换个方法', '为什么还不行'). ALL task types. Not for first failures.
Issue creation workflow for Agent Teams Lite following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a GitHub issue, reporting a bug, or requesting a feature.
Use when orchestrating multi-agent teams for parallel work — feature dev, quality audits, research sprints, bug hunts, or any task needing 2+ agents working concurrently
[BETA] Execute work plans with external delegate support. Same as ce:work but includes experimental Codex delegation mode for token-conserving code implementation.
Design domain-specific agent teams, define specialized agents, and generate the skills they use. Use when you need to decompose a complex project into coordinated multi-agent teams, choose the right architecture pattern (pipeline, fan-out/fan-in, expert pool, producer-reviewer, supervisor, hierarchical delegation), generate .claude/agents/ and .claude/skills/ files, or validate and iterate on generated harnesses. Triggers on: harness, build a harness, design agent team, agent team architecture, multi-agent skill generation, set up harness, harness engineering, domain agent team, harness for this project.
프로젝트 컨텍스트를 파악한 뒤 전문가 관점으로 코드 리뷰하고, 사용자 승인 후 Agent Team SPAWN으로 병렬 개선 작업을 수행합니다. 트리거: 코드리뷰, 코드 리뷰, code review, 리뷰해줘, 리팩토링, 코드검토, PR 리뷰, 변경사항 검토.