Loading...
Loading...
Found 214 Skills
Use when you need to generate many creative options before systematically narrowing to the best choices. Invoke when exploring product ideas, solving open-ended problems, generating strategic alternatives, developing research questions, designing experiments, or when you need both breadth (many ideas) and rigor (principled selection). Use when user mentions brainstorming, ideation, divergent thinking, generating options, or evaluating alternatives.
Use when stakeholders have conflicting priorities and need alignment, suspect decision blind spots from single perspective, need to pressure-test proposals before presenting, want empathy for different viewpoints (eng vs PM vs legal vs user), building consensus across functions, evaluating tradeoffs with multi-dimensional impact, or when user mentions "what would X think", "stakeholder alignment", "see from their perspective", "blind spots", or "conflicting interests".
Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate in a week", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "de-risk before building". Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing. For ongoing experimentation, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. Trigger with 'design', 'sprint'.
Apply Edward de Bono's parallel thinking framework (1985) to make better decisions by examining ideas from six distinct perspectives systematically. Use when: **Making complex decisions** that require multiple perspectives; **Evaluating new products, offers, or strategies** before launch; **Breaking out of analysis paralysis** with structured thinking; **Running productive meetings** where everyone thinks in the same direction; **Balancing optimism with caution** in strategic planning
Apply first-principles thinking to break down complex problems into fundamental truths and rebuild solutions from the ground up. Use when solving strategic decisions, breaking through blockers, or challenging assumptions. Triggers on first principles, Elon Musk methodology, fundamental truths, strip assumptions, physics of the problem, rebuild from scratch.
Spawn 5 Opus subagents with randomly-generated distinct personas to debate a problem from multiple angles. Use when exploring UX decisions, architecture choices, or any decision that benefits from diverse perspectives arguing creatively.
Run a decision through 5 AI advisors with different thinking styles, anonymous peer review, and chairman synthesis. For genuine decisions with stakes and tradeoffs — not simple questions. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council.
Run a structured multi-perspective council on a hard decision, design choice, debugging question, strategy problem, or tradeoff. Use when the user wants multiple viewpoints, explicit cross-examination, and a compact final verdict.
Produces structured judgment briefs for contested situations — news events, decisions, conflicts, strategy questions. Surfaces hidden bets, real disagreements, unspeakable truths, and who concretely pays. Use when the user wants sharper thinking about something messy, not a summary.
Decides when quality matters vs move fast, based on Dylan Field (Figma) craft philosophy and Brian Chesky (Airbnb) details obsession. Use when balancing shipping speed with excellence, deciding if refactoring is needed, or determining which details create moats vs which to skip.
V4.1 Reverse Pricing Calculator, used for profit judgment in cross-border e-commerce Temu product selection. This skill is employed when users need to calculate the net profit of products on the Temu platform, verify if it meets the profit threshold (net profit > ¥5), and conduct reverse pricing analysis. Input the Temu lowest competitor price and 1688 sourcing price, and output the detailed profit calculation process and GO/PASS decision.
"Invert, always invert." Apply Carl Jacobi's mathematical principle and Charlie Munger's investing wisdom to solve problems by thinking backward from failure. Use when: **Goal setting** - Define what would guarantee failure, then avoid it; **Risk analysis** - Identify what could destroy your project before starting; **Decision making** - Evaluate choices by examining their worst outcomes; **Problem solving** - When direct approaches aren't working, reverse the question; **Strategy development...