Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,230 Skills
Execute a plan file or Beads epic systematically with git setup, task tracking, quality checks, and commit workflow. Use when implementing a plan, working through a spec, following documented steps, or executing a Beads issue ID (e.g., bd-123, gno-45, app-12).
Полный цикл разработки доработок 1С — от анализа до реализации с БСП compliance. 9 фаз: оценка, discovery, исследование, уточнение, проектирование, ревью плана, реализация, ревью кода, итоги.
Orchestrates a structured design review by running existing skills in a diagnostic funnel, from complexity triage through structural, interface, and surface checks to a full red-flags sweep. Use when reviewing a file, module or PR for overall design quality and you want a comprehensive, prioritized assessment rather than a single-lens check. Not for applying one specific lens (use that skill directly) or for evolutionary analysis of how code changed over time (use code-evolution).
Perform exhaustive code reviews using multi-agent analysis, ultra-thinking, and worktrees
Run Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI reviews against the current branch concurrently, deduplicate the findings, and fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase.
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
arthrod's coding philosophy and dispatcher. Universal red-green TDD, stacked PRs, test-always, evidence-before-claims. Routes to conejo-code (active coding), conejo-frontend (strict UI), conejo-merge (calm PR/merge). Use when starting any coding work or deciding how to approach a task.
Use when the user wants a plan validated by @coderabbitai but the right approach is uncertain — file 2-3 parallel issues with the SAME GOAL but deliberately shuffled assumptions/layers/triggers, so CR has comparative material instead of yes/no on a single approach. Triggers on multi-assumptions, multi-framing, parallel plans, comparative plan, dangle-the-carrots.
Review code with validated evidence. Use for normal, security, performance, or deep audits of diffs, architecture, data, tests, dependencies, docs, and code health.
Use when preparing a PR for review — applies body templates, uploads visual evidence via the assets backend, and runs the self-audit checklist.
User-invoked interface review of a change rather than a screen: uncommitted work, the current branch, or a pull request. Resolves the change scope, expands it to the surfaces it affects, reads both sides of the diff, and classifies every finding as introduced, a regression, or pre-existing, then hands the review to better-interface for domain routing, severity, and the verdict. Covers interface quality, not correctness, tests, or security. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers on interface-review, review my branch, review my PR, review the diff, review my changes, review before pushing, design regression check, changed files interface review.
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.