Loading...
Loading...
Found 99 Skills
Final retrospective and self-assessment for participants of Claude Code Lab. Runs four sequential interactive parts — progress audit, best prompt, monthly plan, and feedback — using AskUserQuestion. Triggers on "/lab-retro", "lab retrospective", "claude code lab final", or after completing the 6-week Claude Code Lab cohort.
Help users run effective post-mortems and retrospectives. Use when someone is reviewing a project that succeeded or failed, wants to establish learning practices, is dealing with failure aftermath, or needs to improve team learning loops.
Comprehensive Scrum Master assistant for sprint planning, backlog grooming, retrospectives, capacity planning, and daily standups with intelligent context-aware reporting
Use this skill when working with Agile and Scrum methodologies - sprint planning, retrospectives, velocity tracking, Kanban boards, story point estimation, backlog grooming, or team workflow optimization. Triggers on any task involving sprint ceremonies, agile metrics, user story writing, capacity planning, or continuous improvement processes.
Run blameless post-mortems and retrospectives with root-cause analysis and action tracking.
Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event. Triggers on after-action report, AAR, postmortem, retrospective, retro, post-incident review, what went well what didn't, lessons learned, blameless postmortem, root cause analysis, RCA, five whys. Also triggers when the user has just shipped something or just resolved an incident and wants to capture learnings.
Build a retrospective or forward-looking work timeline from git commits, project docs, user notes, or chat records, then output a Markdown and/or HTML report with a Gantt chart or timeline visualization. Use when the user wants to review past work across one or more projects, explain time allocation to a mentor, summarize what was done in a period, or plan the next phase with a timeline.
Set up a full AI ensemble/mob programming team for any software project. Creates team member profiles (.team/), coordinator instructions (.team/coordinator-instructions.md), project owner constraints (PROJECT.md), team conventions (AGENTS.md), architectural decisions (docs/ARCHITECTURE.md), domain glossary, and supporting docs. Use when: (1) starting a new project and wanting a full expert agent team, (2) the user asks to "set up a team", "create a mob team", "set up ensemble programming", or "create agent profiles", (3) converting an existing project to the driver-reviewer mob model, (4) the user wants AI agents to work as a coordinated product team with retrospectives and consensus-based decisions.
Run the organizing team's own internal retrospective on one finished edition of a technical event - the blameless frame, the reconstructed timeline, what went well split from what went poorly, what fired reconciled against the risk register, budget plan and run of show, team-health findings, and dated lessons-learned entries each carrying an owner and a due date. Use whenever asked to run a post-event debrief, a post-mortem or a retrospective after a conference, meetup or hackathon, review an edition against the goals the team set, build a lessons-learned log, or publish a public recap. Do NOT use to collect participant feedback - use samber/dev-event-organizer-skills@event-feedback - or for trends across editions - use samber/dev-event-organizer-skills@event-continuous-improvement.
Run blameless post-mortems and retrospectives: Pack with brief, timeline, contributing factors, root causes, action tracker, kill criteria, dissemination plan. Use for postmortem, retro, after-action review, lessons learned. NOT for non-review meetings (use running-effective-meetings), shipping process design (use shipping-products), engineering culture (use engineering-culture), or future risk planning (use planning-under-uncertainty). Category: Leadership.
Run a retrospective after generating a CLI. Identifies systemic improvements to the Printing Press — templates, Go binary, skill instructions, catalog — so the next CLI comes out better. Creates a GitHub issue with actionable findings when there are Printing Press fixes to make. Use after any /printing-press run. Trigger phrases: "retro", "retrospective", "what went wrong", "improve the press", "post-mortem", "lessons learned", "what can we improve", "file a retro", "submit findings".
Identify which area of the mirror world the current event falls into (Controllable Domain/Blind Domain/Probabilistic Domain/Risk Domain), adopt corresponding survival strategies, and avoid using the deterministic rules of the left-side world to face the uncertain problems of the right-side world. It is suitable for formulating strategies for investment decisions, entrepreneurial choices, and career transitions, as well as retrospective analysis of "why did the execution according to plan fail?". It is not applicable to pure skill improvement and deliberate practice scenarios (which naturally belong to the Controllable Domain). Key trigger signals: "Why isn't hard work paying off?", "Is this matter based on strength or luck?", "How should I deal with uncertainty?", "How to improve the success rate?"