implement-with-sol

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Orchestrate the codex CLI (gpt-sol) as implementation executor with review-fix rounds, then ship the PR. Use when the user asks to delegate implementation or execution to codex, sol, or gpt-sol, or to send review findings back to a codex session.

2installs

Sourcewkentaro/skills

Added on2026-08-27

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add wkentaro/skills implement-with-sol

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

implement-with-sol

Codex implements in a worktree; you keep planning, review, and synthesis. Ends with a PR ready for human review.

Steps

Worktree: create one with
```
git wt <branch> origin/<default-branch>
```
and run everything from inside it.
Spec file: save the task spec verbatim to a temp file (e.g.
```
gh issue view <n> --json title,body -q '"# " + .title + "\n\n" + .body' > /tmp/<slug>.md
```
) so the prompt references a path instead of inlining it.
Launch from the worktree, in the background:
```
codex exec --sandbox workspace-write "<prompt>"
```
Global flags precede the subcommand: follow-ups are
```
codex exec --sandbox workspace-write resume --last "<prompt>"
```
— flags placed after
```
resume
```
fail. The model comes from
```
~/.codex/config.toml
```
; override with
```
-m
```
.
The prompt names: the spec path with "follow every decision in it"; the existing code and test patterns to study; the definition of done (build, lint, and tests pass; required cases covered); the review instruction "when done, run the review-fix skill on the working tree with its Default Review Policy — supply no review brief"; "Do NOT commit — leave changes in the working tree"; and "print files changed and each verification command with its result".

Word the review instruction exactly that way: any prose describing what to review becomes a Review Brief, and a brief replaces the Default Review Policy with a single ad-hoc reviewer instead of the full panel.
Verify: rerun the claimed checks yourself, review the diff against the spec decision by decision, and smoke-test edge cases the spec calls out. Codex's report is a claim, not evidence.
Fix rounds: send each finding via
```
resume --last
```
as in step 3 and re-verify, until a review pass finds nothing. Trivial one-file tweaks may be fixed directly instead.
Ship: commit per the logical-commits skill (
```
git-hunk skills get core logical-commits
```
), then invoke
```
make-pr
```
.

Done when a review pass finds nothing, the checks pass locally, and the PR URL is returned.

implement-with-sol

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

implement-with-sol

Steps