<objective>
Creates WebView UI mockups for audio plugins through iterative design and implementation scaffolding.
</objective>
<quick_start>
- Check for aesthetic library (Phase 0)
- Gather requirements through tiered questions (Phases 1-3)
- Dispatch ui-design-agent for mockup generation
- Iterate until user approves
- Generate implementation files
</quick_start>
<workflow>
<phase name="A-design-iteration">
<purpose>Generate 2 design files for rapid iteration</purpose>
<outputs>
- `v[N]-ui.yaml` - Machine-readable design specification
- `v[N]-ui-test.html` - Browser-testable mockup
</outputs>
<gate>Do NOT proceed to Phase B until user approves design via Phase 5.5 decision menu</gate>
</phase>
<phase name="B-implementation-scaffolding">
<purpose>Generate 5 implementation files ONLY after Phase A approval</purpose>
<outputs>
- `v[N]-ui.html` - Production HTML
- `v[N]-PluginEditor.h` - C++ header boilerplate
- `v[N]-PluginEditor.cpp` - C++ implementation boilerplate
- `v[N]-CMakeLists.txt` - WebView build configuration
- `v[N]-integration-checklist.md` - Implementation steps
</outputs>
<location>plugins/[PluginName]/.ideas/mockups/</location>
</phase>
</workflow>
<context_detection>
<standalone_mode>
- No file present
- Generates mockups independently
- Skips state updates
</standalone_mode>
<workflow_mode>
- File
plugins/[PluginName]/.continue-here.md
exists with field
- Updates workflow state after each phase
</workflow_mode>
Check for
existence to determine mode. If present, update state files. If absent, skip state updates.
</context_detection>
<phase name="0-aesthetic-check">
Check if `.claude/aesthetics/manifest.json` exists. If found, count aesthetics using jq.
<menu>
Found {N} saved aesthetics in library.
How would you like to start the UI design?
- Start from aesthetic template - Apply saved visual system
- Start from scratch - Create custom design
- List all aesthetics - Browse library before deciding
Choose (1-3): _
</menu>
<routing>
- Option 1: Display aesthetics from manifest with metadata (name, vibe, colors, source). Invoke ui-template-library skill with "apply" operation. Skip to Phase 4 with generated mockup.
- Option 2: Continue to Phase 1 (load context).
- Option 3: Invoke ui-template-library skill with "list" operation, show previews, return to menu.
- No aesthetics: Skip directly to Phase 1.
</routing>
See
references/aesthetic-integration.md
for complete integration details.
</phase>
<phase name="1-load-context">
Load context from creative brief and extract requirements.
See `references/phase-details.md` for extraction protocol.
See `references/context-extraction.md#example-extracting-from-creative-brief` for examples.
</phase>
<phase name="1.5-context-aware-prompt">
Adapt initial prompt based on creative brief contents (rich/minimal/zero UI details).
See `references/phase-details.md` for prompt templates.
</phase>
<phase name="2-gap-analysis">
Analyze gaps in Tier 1 (Critical), Tier 2 (Visual), Tier 3 (Polish) requirements.
See `references/phase-details.md` for tier definitions.
See `references/design-questions.md` for question templates.
</phase>
<phase name="2.5-calculate-dimensions">
Calculate recommended window size before asking user.
See `references/phase-details.md` for calculation steps.
See `references/layout-validation.md` Section 2 for formulas.
</phase>
<phase name="3-question-batch">
Generate exactly 4 questions using AskUserQuestion based on identified gaps.
See `references/phase-details.md` for rules and question format.
See `references/design-questions.md#example-question-batches` for templates.
</phase>
<phase name="3.5-decision-gate">
Present decision gate with AskUserQuestion: finalize, ask more questions, or add context.
Route to Phase 4, back to Phase 2, or collect free-form text.
See `references/phase-details.md` for menu format and routing.
</phase>
<phase name="4-5.45-design-agent">
Invoke ui-design-agent via Task tool to generate YAML + test HTML.
Include in invocation prompt:
- All gathered requirements (layout, controls, colors, etc.)
- Quality expectation: "Design must look like commercial $50-200 audio plugin - intentional decisions, not defaults"
See
references/phase-details.md
for invocation summary.
See
references/delegation-protocols.md
for complete protocol.
</phase>
<phase name="5.5-design-decision-menu">
<gate>CRITICAL: Phases 6-10 ONLY execute if user chooses option 2 (Finalize)</gate>
<menu>
Mockup v[N] design created (2 files)
Files generated:
- v[N]-ui.yaml (design specification)
- v[N]-ui-test.html (browser-testable mockup)
What would you like to do?
- Iterate - Refine design, adjust layout
- Finalize - Validate alignment and complete mockup
- Save as template - Add to aesthetic library for reuse
- Other
Choose (1-4): _
</menu>
<routing>
- Option 1 (Iterate): Collect refinement feedback, return to Phase 2 with new version (v2, v3, etc.), invoke NEW ui-design-agent instance (fresh context).
- Option 2 (Finalize): Proceed to Phase 5.6 (automatic brief update), mockup is source of truth for UI sections, no user interaction needed, continue to Phase 6-10 after brief sync.
- Option 3 (Save as template): Invoke ui-template-library skill with "save" operation, after saving return to Phase 5.5 menu.
- Option 4 (Other): Handle custom request (test in browser, validate constraints, etc.).
</routing>
<iteration_guidance>
When collecting feedback for Option 1 (Iterate):
If user provides specific changes ("make it vertical", "add a meter", "change colors to blue"):
- Pass these as explicit requirements to new ui-design-agent instance
If user provides vague improvement requests ("make it better", "improve it", "polish it"):
- Prompt for specifics: "What aspect should I focus on? (layout, colors, spacing, controls)"
- If user says "everything" or "overall quality": Pass instruction to refine existing elements (spacing, color harmony, control styling) rather than add new elements
</iteration_guidance>
See
references/decision-menus.md#phase-5-5-design-decision-menu
for detailed routing.
</phase>
<phase name="5.6-update-brief">
Automatic update of creative brief from finalized mockup.
Triggered by "Finalize" selection in Phase 5.5.
No user interaction required.
See `references/phase-details.md` for protocol.
</phase>
<phase name="6-10-implementation">
<prerequisites>
- User confirmed design in Phase 5.5 (selected option 2: Finalize)
- Phase A files exist (`v[N]-ui.yaml`, `v[N]-ui-test.html`)
- Finalization marker present in YAML
</prerequisites>
See
references/phase-b-enforcement.md
for guard implementation.
</phase>
<phase name="6-10.5-finalization-agent">
Invoke ui-finalization-agent via Task tool to generate 5 implementation files.
See `references/phase-details.md` for invocation summary.
See `references/delegation-protocols.md` for complete protocol.
</phase>
<phase name="10.7-completion-menu">
Present completion menu after ui-finalization-agent returns successfully.
See `references/decision-menus.md#completion-menu` for format and routing.
</phase>
<orchestration_protocol>
<delegation_rules>
This skill NEVER generates mockup files directly. ALL file generation delegated to subagents.
<sequence>
1. Orchestrator: Gather requirements (Phases 0-3.5)
2. Orchestrator: Invoke ui-design-agent via Task tool
3. ui-design-agent: Generate YAML + test HTML, commit, return JSON
4. Orchestrator: Parse JSON, present Phase 5.5 menu
5. If iterate: Orchestrator invokes NEW ui-design-agent
6. If finalize: Orchestrator updates brief (Phase 5.6)
7. Orchestrator: Invoke ui-finalization-agent via Task tool
8. ui-finalization-agent: Generate 5 files, commit, return JSON
9. Orchestrator: Parse JSON, present completion menu
</sequence>
See
references/delegation-protocols.md
for enforcement details.
</delegation_rules>
<state_management>
Subagents update
with their phase results. Orchestrator verifies
flag in JSON report.
After subagent returns
, verify actual state contents match expected values (not just boolean flag).
Read
, parse YAML, check specific fields match JSON report values. If mismatch, present state recovery menu.
See
references/state-tracking.md
for complete state schema and verification protocol.
</state_management>
<iteration_protocol>
Each iteration runs in fresh agent context. User chooses "Iterate" then orchestrator collects feedback and invokes NEW ui-design-agent with incremented version. Fresh context prevents context window bloat during iterative design.
</iteration_protocol>
<error_handling>
- Agent failures: Present error menu (retry/manual fix/debug/cancel).
- Validation failures: Agent returns - present error menu.
- State update failures: Agent returns - present state recovery menu (verify/manual update/continue anyway).
</error_handling>
</orchestration_protocol>
<versioning_strategy>
Pattern: v1, v2, v3... Each version saved separately.
Purpose: Explore layouts without losing work, A/B test designs, keep history for rollback.
File naming: All 7 files prefixed with version (e.g.,
,
).
Implementation: Latest version used for Stage 3 (GUI) unless user specifies different version.
See
for file management details.
</versioning_strategy>
<success_criteria>
<design_phase>
- YAML spec generated matching user requirements
- Browser test HTML works (interactive controls, parameter messages)
- Visual quality meets commercial standard (intentional design, not defaults)
- Design files committed to git
- updated with version (if workflow mode)
- User presented with Phase 5.5 decision menu
- Design approved OR user iterates with refinements
</design_phase>
<implementation_phase>
- All 7 files generated and saved to
- Production HTML complete (no placeholders)
- C++ boilerplate matches YAML structure (correct parameter bindings)
- parameter-spec.md generated and locked (v1 only)
- Implementation files committed to git
- updated with finalization status (if workflow mode)
</implementation_phase>
</success_criteria>
<integration_points>
<invoked_by>
- command - After creative brief, before implementation
- skill - During Stage 0 (UI design phase)
- skill - When redesigning existing plugin UI
- Natural language: "Design UI for [PluginName]", "Create mockup for compressor"
</invoked_by>
<always_invokes>
- subagent (Phase 4-5.45) - REQUIRED for design iteration
- subagent (Phase 6-10.5) - REQUIRED for implementation files
</always_invokes>
<also_invokes>
- skill (if user saves aesthetic)
</also_invokes>
<creates>
- `plugins/[Name]/.ideas/mockups/v[N]-*.{yaml,html,h,cpp,txt,md}` (7 files)
- `plugins/[Name]/.ideas/parameter-spec.md` (if v1 and doesn't exist)
</creates>
<updates>
- `PLUGINS.md` - Mark UI designed (if workflow)
- `.continue-here.md` - Update workflow state (if workflow)
</updates>
<blocks>
- Stage 1 (Foundation) - Cannot proceed without parameter-spec.md
- Stage 3 (GUI) - Cannot implement without approved UI mockup
</blocks>
</integration_points>
<reference_documentation>
Progressive disclosure - load references when reaching specific phases:
- Phase 0:
references/aesthetic-integration.md
- Aesthetic library integration
- Phase 1:
references/context-extraction.md
- Creative brief extraction
- Phase 2-3:
references/design-questions.md
- Question templates and tiering
- Phase 2.5:
references/layout-validation.md
- Dimension calculation formulas
- Phase 4-5.45:
references/delegation-protocols.md
- Subagent invocation
- Phase 5.5:
references/decision-menus.md
- Menu format and routing
- Phase 5.6:
references/state-tracking.md
- Brief sync protocol
- Phase 6-10:
references/phase-b-enforcement.md
- Phase B guard
- Anti-patterns:
references/common-pitfalls.md
- What to avoid
Technical details:
references/html-generation.md
- Production HTML rules
references/browser-testing.md
- Browser test workflow
references/cmake-configuration.md
- WebView build settings
references/cpp-boilerplate-generation.md
- C++ template generation
references/ui-design-rules.md
- Design constraints and patterns
- - File management
</reference_documentation>
<template_assets>
assets/ui-yaml-template.yaml
- YAML structure
assets/webview-boilerplate.md
- C++ integration templates
assets/integration-checklist-template.md
- Integration guide
assets/parameter-spec-template.md
- Parameter specification format
</template_assets>