test-driven-development

Original🇺🇸 English
Not Translated

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

1installs
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add markhamsquareventures/essentials test-driven-development

SKILL.md Content

Test-Driven Development (TDD) for Laravel

Overview

Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.

When to Use

Always:
  • New features
  • Bug fixes
  • Refactoring
  • Behavior changes
Exceptions (ask your human partner):
  • Throwaway prototypes
  • Generated code (migrations, factories)
  • Configuration files
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.

The Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
  • Don't keep it as "reference"
  • Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
  • Don't look at it
  • Delete means delete
Implement fresh from tests. Period.

Red-Green-Refactor

RED - Write Failing Test

Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
Good:
php
test('retries failed operations 3 times', function () {
    $attempts = 0;

    $operation = function () use (&$attempts) {
        $attempts++;
        if ($attempts < 3) {
            throw new Exception('fail');
        }
        return 'success';
    };

    $result = retryOperation($operation);

    expect($result)->toBe('success');
    expect($attempts)->toBe(3);
});
Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing
Bad:
php
test('retry works', function () {
    $mock = Mockery::mock(SomeService::class);
    $mock->shouldReceive('call')
        ->times(3)
        ->andThrow(new Exception(), new Exception())
        ->andReturn('success');

    retryOperation(fn () => $mock->call());

    // Only verifies mock was called, not actual behavior
});
Vague name, tests mock not code
Requirements:
  • One behavior
  • Clear name
  • Real code (no mocks unless unavoidable)

Verify RED - Watch It Fail

MANDATORY. Never skip.
bash
php artisan test --filter="retries failed operations"
Confirm:
  • Test fails (not errors)
  • Failure message is expected
  • Fails because feature missing (not typos)
Test passes? You're testing existing behavior. Fix test.
Test errors? Fix error, re-run until it fails correctly.

GREEN - Minimal Code

Write simplest code to pass the test.
Good:
php
function retryOperation(callable $fn, int $maxRetries = 3): mixed
{
    for ($i = 0; $i < $maxRetries; $i++) {
        try {
            return $fn();
        } catch (Exception $e) {
            if ($i === $maxRetries - 1) {
                throw $e;
            }
        }
    }
}
Just enough to pass
Bad:
php
function retryOperation(
    callable $fn,
    int $maxRetries = 3,
    string $backoff = 'exponential',
    ?callable $onRetry = null,
    ?LoggerInterface $logger = null,
): mixed {
    // YAGNI - You Aren't Gonna Need It
}
Over-engineered
Don't add features, refactor other code, or "improve" beyond the test.

Verify GREEN - Watch It Pass

MANDATORY.
bash
php artisan test --filter="retries failed operations"
Confirm:
  • Test passes
  • Other tests still pass
  • Output pristine (no errors, warnings, deprecations)
Test fails? Fix code, not test.
Other tests fail? Fix now.

REFACTOR - Clean Up

After green only:
  • Remove duplication
  • Improve names
  • Extract to Actions, Services, or helpers
Keep tests green. Don't add behavior.

Repeat

Next failing test for next feature.

Good Tests

QualityGoodBad
MinimalOne thing. "and" in name? Split it.
test('validates email and domain and whitespace')
ClearName describes behavior
test('test1')
Shows intentDemonstrates desired APIObscures what code should do

Why Order Matters

"I'll write tests after to verify it works"
Tests written after code pass immediately. Passing immediately proves nothing:
  • Might test wrong thing
  • Might test implementation, not behavior
  • Might miss edge cases you forgot
  • You never saw it catch the bug
Test-first forces you to see the test fail, proving it actually tests something.
"I already manually tested all the edge cases"
Manual testing is ad-hoc. You think you tested everything but:
  • No record of what you tested
  • Can't re-run when code changes
  • Easy to forget cases under pressure
  • "It worked when I tried it" ≠ comprehensive
Automated tests are systematic. They run the same way every time.
"Deleting X hours of work is wasteful"
Sunk cost fallacy. The time is already gone. Your choice now:
  • Delete and rewrite with TDD (X more hours, high confidence)
  • Keep it and add tests after (30 min, low confidence, likely bugs)
The "waste" is keeping code you can't trust. Working code without real tests is technical debt.
"TDD is dogmatic, being pragmatic means adapting"
TDD IS pragmatic:
  • Finds bugs before commit (faster than debugging after)
  • Prevents regressions (tests catch breaks immediately)
  • Documents behavior (tests show how to use code)
  • Enables refactoring (change freely, tests catch breaks)
"Pragmatic" shortcuts = debugging in production = slower.
"Tests after achieve the same goals - it's spirit not ritual"
No. Tests-after answer "What does this do?" Tests-first answer "What should this do?"
Tests-after are biased by your implementation. You test what you built, not what's required. You verify remembered edge cases, not discovered ones.
Tests-first force edge case discovery before implementing. Tests-after verify you remembered everything (you didn't).
30 minutes of tests after ≠ TDD. You get coverage, lose proof tests work.

Common Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"Too simple to test"Simple code breaks. Test takes 30 seconds.
"I'll test after"Tests passing immediately prove nothing.
"Tests after achieve same goals"Tests-after = "what does this do?" Tests-first = "what should this do?"
"Already manually tested"Ad-hoc ≠ systematic. No record, can't re-run.
"Deleting X hours is wasteful"Sunk cost fallacy. Keeping unverified code is technical debt.
"Keep as reference, write tests first"You'll adapt it. That's testing after. Delete means delete.
"Need to explore first"Fine. Throw away exploration, start with TDD.
"Test hard = design unclear"Listen to test. Hard to test = hard to use.
"TDD will slow me down"TDD faster than debugging. Pragmatic = test-first.
"Manual test faster"Manual doesn't prove edge cases. You'll re-test every change.
"Existing code has no tests"You're improving it. Add tests for existing code.

Red Flags - STOP and Start Over

  • Code before test
  • Test after implementation
  • Test passes immediately
  • Can't explain why test failed
  • Tests added "later"
  • Rationalizing "just this once"
  • "I already manually tested it"
  • "Tests after achieve the same purpose"
  • "It's about spirit not ritual"
  • "Keep as reference" or "adapt existing code"
  • "Already spent X hours, deleting is wasteful"
  • "TDD is dogmatic, I'm being pragmatic"
  • "This is different because..."
All of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.

Laravel-Specific Examples

Example: Bug Fix with Form Request

Bug: Empty email accepted
RED
php
test('rejects empty email', function () {
    $response = $this->postJson('/api/users', [
        'email' => '',
        'name' => 'Test User',
    ]);

    $response->assertStatus(422)
        ->assertJsonValidationErrors(['email']);
});
Verify RED
bash
$ php artisan test --filter="rejects empty email"
FAIL: Expected status 422, got 200
GREEN
php
// app/Http/Requests/StoreUserRequest.php
class StoreUserRequest extends FormRequest
{
    public function rules(): array
    {
        return [
            'email' => ['required', 'email'],
            'name' => ['required', 'string'],
        ];
    }
}
Verify GREEN
bash
$ php artisan test --filter="rejects empty email"
PASS

Example: Action Class

RED
php
test('calculate order total includes tax', function () {
    $order = Order::factory()->create([
        'subtotal' => 10000, // $100.00 in cents
    ]);

    $action = new CalculateOrderTotalAction();
    $result = $action->execute($order, taxRate: 0.08);

    expect($result->total)->toBe(10800);
    expect($result->tax)->toBe(800);
});
Verify RED
bash
$ php artisan test --filter="calculate order total"
FAIL: Class CalculateOrderTotalAction not found
GREEN
php
// app/Actions/CalculateOrderTotalAction.php
class CalculateOrderTotalAction
{
    public function execute(Order $order, float $taxRate): OrderTotal
    {
        $tax = (int) round($order->subtotal * $taxRate);

        return new OrderTotal(
            subtotal: $order->subtotal,
            tax: $tax,
            total: $order->subtotal + $tax,
        );
    }
}
Verify GREEN
bash
$ php artisan test --filter="calculate order total"
PASS

Example: Policy/Gate Authorization

RED
php
test('users can only view their own orders', function () {
    $user = User::factory()->create();
    $otherUser = User::factory()->create();
    $order = Order::factory()->for($otherUser)->create();

    $this->actingAs($user);

    expect($user->can('view', $order))->toBeFalse();
});

test('users can view their own orders', function () {
    $user = User::factory()->create();
    $order = Order::factory()->for($user)->create();

    $this->actingAs($user);

    expect($user->can('view', $order))->toBeTrue();
});
GREEN
php
// app/Policies/OrderPolicy.php
class OrderPolicy
{
    public function view(User $user, Order $order): bool
    {
        return $user->id === $order->user_id;
    }
}

Example: Eloquent Scope

RED
php
test('active scope returns only active users', function () {
    User::factory()->count(3)->create(['active' => true]);
    User::factory()->count(2)->create(['active' => false]);

    $activeUsers = User::active()->get();

    expect($activeUsers)->toHaveCount(3);
    expect($activeUsers->pluck('active')->unique()->all())->toBe([true]);
});
GREEN
php
// app/Models/User.php
public function scopeActive(Builder $query): Builder
{
    return $query->where('active', true);
}

Example: Job/Queue

RED
php
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Queue;

test('order completion dispatches notification job', function () {
    Queue::fake();

    $order = Order::factory()->create();
    $action = new CompleteOrderAction();

    $action->execute($order);

    Queue::assertPushed(SendOrderCompletionNotification::class, function ($job) use ($order) {
        return $job->order->id === $order->id;
    });
});
GREEN
php
class CompleteOrderAction
{
    public function execute(Order $order): void
    {
        $order->update(['status' => 'completed']);

        SendOrderCompletionNotification::dispatch($order);
    }
}

Example: Event Listener

RED
php
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Event;

test('user registration fires UserRegistered event', function () {
    Event::fake([UserRegistered::class]);

    $action = new RegisterUserAction();
    $user = $action->execute([
        'email' => 'test@example.com',
        'password' => 'password',
    ]);

    Event::assertDispatched(UserRegistered::class, function ($event) use ($user) {
        return $event->user->id === $user->id;
    });
});
GREEN
php
class RegisterUserAction
{
    public function execute(array $data): User
    {
        $user = User::create([
            'email' => $data['email'],
            'password' => Hash::make($data['password']),
        ]);

        event(new UserRegistered($user));

        return $user;
    }
}

Pest-Specific Features

Use
describe
for Grouping Related Tests

php
describe('OrderPolicy', function () {
    test('owners can view their orders', function () {
        // ...
    });

    test('owners can cancel pending orders', function () {
        // ...
    });

    test('owners cannot cancel shipped orders', function () {
        // ...
    });
});

Use
beforeEach
for Common Setup

php
beforeEach(function () {
    $this->user = User::factory()->create();
    $this->actingAs($this->user);
});

test('can create order', function () {
    // $this->user is available
});

Use Datasets for Parameterized Tests

php
dataset('invalid_emails', [
    'empty string' => [''],
    'missing @' => ['invalidemail.com'],
    'missing domain' => ['test@'],
    'spaces' => ['test @example.com'],
]);

test('rejects invalid email formats', function (string $email) {
    $response = $this->postJson('/api/users', [
        'email' => $email,
        'name' => 'Test',
    ]);

    $response->assertJsonValidationErrors(['email']);
})->with('invalid_emails');

Use Higher-Order Tests for Simple Cases

php
test('homepage loads successfully')
    ->get('/')
    ->assertOk();

test('guests cannot access dashboard')
    ->get('/dashboard')
    ->assertRedirect('/login');

Verification Checklist

Before marking work complete:
  • Every new Action/Service/Model method has a test
  • Watched each test fail before implementing
  • Each test failed for expected reason (feature missing, not typo)
  • Wrote minimal code to pass each test
  • All tests pass:
    php artisan test
  • Output pristine (no errors, warnings, deprecations)
  • Tests use real code (fakes only for external services)
  • Edge cases and errors covered
Can't check all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over.

Useful Commands

bash
# Run all tests
php artisan test

# Run specific test by name
php artisan test --filter="rejects empty email"

# Run specific test file
php artisan test tests/Feature/OrderTest.php

# Run tests in parallel
php artisan test --parallel

# Run with coverage
php artisan test --coverage

# Run and stop on first failure
php artisan test --stop-on-failure

# Run only dirty tests (changed files)
php artisan test --dirty

When Stuck

ProblemSolution
Don't know how to testWrite wished-for API. Write assertion first. Ask your human partner.
Test too complicatedDesign too complicated. Simplify interface.
Must mock everythingCode too coupled. Use dependency injection.
Test setup hugeUse factories, traits, helpers. Still complex? Simplify design.
Database slowUse
RefreshDatabase
or
LazilyRefreshDatabase
trait.

Debugging Integration

Bug found? Write failing test reproducing it. Follow TDD cycle. Test proves fix and prevents regression.
Never fix bugs without a test.

Final Rule

Production code → test exists and failed first
Otherwise → not TDD
No exceptions without your human partner's permission.