superspec-research

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Use when the user needs proposal/specs research artifacts produced for a Superspec (superspec-rpi) OpenSpec change.

5installs

Sourceneversight/skills_feed

Added on2026-02-15

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add neversight/skills_feed superspec-research

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Superspec Research

Rules (non-negotiable)

Drive OpenSpec via CLI only (NO OpenSpec slash commands; i.e., commands starting with
```
/opsx
```
or
```
/openspec
```
).
Prefer JSON output for every OpenSpec call that supports it (use
```
--json
```
).
- If a required command does not support
```
--json
```
  (e.g.,
```
openspec new change
```
  ), run it without
```
--json
```
  and continue with the next JSON-capable command (typically
```
openspec status --change <change> --json
```
  ).
Keep changes scoped to
```
proposal
```
and
```
specs
```
artifacts only.
If
```
proposal
```
is not complete, run the brainstorming prelude before writing
```
proposal.md
```
(see
```
skills/superspec-brainstorm/SKILL.md
```
).

Change Selection

If the user provides a change name, use it as
```
<change>
```
.
Else run:
- ```
openspec list --json
```
  Ask the user to confirm/select a change name from the JSON output.
If there are no changes (or user wants a new one), ask for:
- change name (kebab-case)
- one-sentence description Then run:
- ```
openspec new change <change> --schema superspec-rpi --description "<description>"
```

Always print:

```
Selected change: <change>
```

Artifact Loop (proposal + specs)

Repeat until BOTH

proposal

and

specs

are complete.

0. Inspect status

Run:

openspec status --change <change> --json

Parse the JSON to determine, for artifacts

proposal

and

specs

whether each is
```
ready
```
vs
```
complete
```
whether
```
specs
```
is blocked by missing
```
proposal
```

If the JSON schema is unclear, show the JSON and ask the user what the status fields mean; do not guess.

1. Blocked behavior

specs

is blocked by missing

proposal

, create

proposal

first (even if

specs

looks ready).

1.5 Brainstorming prelude (proposal inputs)

proposal

is ready (and not complete), do a short clarification pass BEFORE writing files:

Follow
```
skills/superspec-brainstorm/SKILL.md
```
as a subroutine.
Do NOT run
```
openspec
```
during brainstorming.
Do NOT write or modify any files during brainstorming.
Keep a "Brainstorming Notes" block as working notes.

Exit brainstorming when:

You have concrete bullets for intent, background, in-scope, out-of-scope, constraints, affected specs, and success criteria.
Affected Specs names are decided (kebab-case), because they drive
```
specs/<kebab-name>/spec.md
```
.

Then proceed to create/update

proposal.md

using OpenSpec instructions, using the notes to fill the template precisely.

If you believe you already know all the answers, you still MUST produce the "Brainstorming Notes" block before writing

proposal.md

2. Create/Update proposal

proposal

is ready (and not complete):

Run:

openspec instructions proposal --change <change> --json

From the JSON, extract at minimum:
- ```
outputPath
```
  (where to write)
- ```
template
```
  and/or
```
instruction
```
  content
Write the proposal content to the concrete
```
outputPath
```
(typically
```
proposal.md
```
).

outputPath

is not a concrete file path (unexpected), STOP and show the full JSON.

Proposal must be concise and must include a filled "Affected Specs" section (it drives specs file creation).

After writing, print:

```
Wrote proposal: <outputPath>
```

3. Create/Update specs

specs

is ready (and not complete):

Run:

openspec instructions specs --change <change> --json

Read dependencies from the JSON (e.g.,
```
requires
```
) and ensure proposal exists; if not, go create proposal.
Treat
```
outputPath
```
patterns like
```
specs/**/spec.md
```
as a hint ONLY. Do not write wildcard paths.
Determine concrete spec files from the proposal "Affected Specs".

Create one delta spec per affected capability (new/modified/removed), at:

```
specs/<kebab-name>/spec.md
```

Each delta spec MUST:

Be a delta (changes only), structured into:

```
## ADDED Requirements
```
```
## MODIFIED Requirements
```
```
## REMOVED Requirements
```

Use normative language per requirement (MUST/SHALL).
For every ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED requirement, include Given/When/Then scenarios:
- at least one happy path (if applicable)
- at least one edge/failure case
- every
```
#### Scenario:
```
  MUST include a
```
##### Test Obligation
```
  block with:
```
Type
```
  (unit|integration|e2e),
```
Test File
```
  ,
```
Test Name
```
  ,
```
Verify Command
```
  ,
```
Expected (RED)
```
  , and
```
Key Assertions
```
  . If any field is missing, ask the user; do not guess.

After writing, print:

```
Wrote specs: <path1>[, <path2> ...]
```

4. Re-check

After creating proposal or specs, re-run:

openspec status --change <change> --json

Stop the loop only when both artifacts show complete.

Minimal Output Contract

Always show
```
Selected change: <change>
```
.
For each artifact you write, show exactly which artifact and the concrete path(s).
On any error, show the exact command that failed (including
```
--json
```
).

Common mistakes

Using OpenSpec slash commands (anything starting with
```
/opsx
```
or
```
/openspec
```
) instead of the
```
openspec
```
CLI.
Treating wildcard
```
outputPath
```
(e.g.,
```
specs/**/spec.md
```
) as a real file path; always write concrete files like
```
specs/<kebab-name>/spec.md
```
.
Guessing
```
openspec
```
JSON fields instead of showing the JSON and asking the user.

superspec-research

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

Superspec Research

Rules (non-negotiable)

Change Selection

Artifact Loop (proposal + specs)

0. Inspect status

1. Blocked behavior

1.5 Brainstorming prelude (proposal inputs)

2. Create/Update proposal

3. Create/Update specs

4. Re-check

Minimal Output Contract

Common mistakes