Skill Factory

Autonomous skill creation - just tell me what you need, I'll handle everything.

What This Does

You request a skill, I deliver a production-ready skill with guaranteed quality (score >= 8.0/10).

No decision-making required. No tool selection. No quality checking. Just results.

Anthropic's Official Best Practices

For comprehensive guidance on creating effective skills, see:

references/overview.md - Complete overview of Agent Skills architecture, progressive disclosure, and how Skills work across different platforms (API, Claude Code, Agent SDK, claude.ai)
references/quickstart.md - Quick tutorial on using pre-built Agent Skills in the Claude API with practical code examples
references/best-practices.md - Detailed authoring best practices including core principles, skill structure, progressive disclosure patterns, workflows, evaluation strategies, and common patterns
references/anthropic-best-practices.md - Quality scoring system (10/10 criteria) used by skill-factory

These references provide Anthropic's official guidance and are consulted during the quality assurance phase.

Usage

Simply describe the skill you need:

"Create a skill for Anchor development with latest docs and best practices"
"Create a React skill from react.dev with comprehensive examples"
"Create a skill for Solana transaction debugging workflows"
"Create a skill for writing technical documentation following company standards"

I will automatically:

✅ Analyze your request
✅ Select the optimal creation method
✅ Create the skill
✅ Run quality assurance loops (until score >= 8.0)
✅ Test with automated scenarios
✅ Deliver ready-to-use skill with stats

What You Get

✅ anchor-development skill ready!

📊 Quality Score: 8.9/10 (Excellent)
📝 Lines: 412 (using progressive disclosure)
📚 Coverage: 247 documentation pages
💡 Examples: 68 code samples
🧪 Test Pass Rate: 100% (15/15 scenarios)

📁 Location: ~/.claude/skills/anchor-development/
📦 Zip: ~/Downloads/anchor-development.zip

Try it: "How do I create an Anchor program?"

How It Works (Behind the Scenes)

Phase 1: Request Analysis (Automatic)

I analyze your request to determine:

Source Detection:

Documentation URL/mention? → Automated scraping path
"Latest docs", "current version"? → Automated path
GitHub repository mention? → Automated path
PDF/manual path? → Automated path
Custom workflow/process description? → Manual TDD path
Both documentation AND custom needs? → Hybrid path

Quality Requirements Extraction:

"Best practices" → Enforce quality gates
"Latest version" → Scrape current docs
"Examples" → Ensure code samples included
"Comprehensive" → Verify coverage completeness

Phase 2: Execution (Automatic)

Path A: Documentation-Based (Skill_Seekers)

Detected: Documentation source available
Method: Automated scraping with quality enhancement

Steps I take:
1. Check Skill_Seekers installation (install if needed)
2. Configure scraping parameters automatically
3. Run scraping with optimal settings
4. Monitor progress
5. Initial quality check
6. If score < 8.0: Run enhancement loop
7. Re-score until >= 8.0
8. Test with auto-generated scenarios
9. Package and deliver

Path B: Custom Workflows (Manual TDD)

Detected: Custom workflow/process
Method: Test-Driven Documentation (obra methodology)

Steps I take:
1. Create pressure test scenarios
2. Run baseline (without skill)
3. Document agent behavior
4. Write minimal skill addressing baseline
5. Test with skill present
6. Identify rationalizations/gaps
7. Close loopholes
8. Iterate until bulletproof
9. Package and deliver

Path C: Hybrid

Detected: Documentation + custom requirements
Method: Scrape then enhance

Steps I take:
1. Scrape documentation (Path A)
2. Identify gaps vs requirements
3. Fill gaps with TDD approach (Path B)
4. Unify and test as whole
5. Quality loop until >= 8.0
6. Package and deliver

Phase 3: Quality Assurance Loop (Automatic)

I enforce Anthropic best practices:

python

while quality_score < 8.0:
    issues = analyze_against_anthropic_guidelines(skill)

    if "vague_description" in issues:
        improve_description_specificity()

    if "missing_examples" in issues:
        extract_or_generate_examples()

    if "too_long" in issues:
        apply_progressive_disclosure()

    if "poor_structure" in issues:
        reorganize_content()

    quality_score = rescore()

Quality Criteria (Anthropic Best Practices):

✅ Description: Specific, clear, includes when_to_use
✅ Conciseness: <500 lines OR progressive disclosure
✅ Examples: Concrete code samples, not abstract
✅ Structure: Well-organized, clear sections
✅ Name: Follows conventions (lowercase, hyphens, descriptive)

Important: The quality assurance process consults references/best-practices.md for Anthropic's complete authoring guidelines and references/anthropic-best-practices.md for the 10-point scoring criteria.

Phase 4: Testing (Automatic)

I generate and run test scenarios:

python

# Auto-generate test cases from skill content
test_cases = extract_key_topics(skill)

for topic in test_cases:
    query = f"How do I {topic}?"

    # Test WITHOUT skill (baseline)
    baseline = run_query_without_skill(query)

    # Test WITH skill
    with_skill = run_query_with_skill(query)

    # Verify improvement
    if not is_better(with_skill, baseline):
        identify_gap()
        enhance_skill()
        retest()

Phase 5: Delivery (Automatic)

Package skill:
- Create skill directory structure
- Generate SKILL.md with frontmatter
- Create reference files (if using progressive disclosure)
- Add examples directory
- Create .zip for easy upload
- Install to ~/.claude/skills/ (if desired)
- Generate summary statistics

Progress Reporting

You'll see real-time progress:

🔍 Analyzing request...
   ✅ Detected: Documentation-based (docs.rs/anchor-lang)
   ✅ Requirements: Latest version, best practices, examples

🔄 Creating skill...
   📥 Scraping docs.rs/anchor-lang... (2 min)
   📚 Extracting 247 pages...
   💾 Organizing content...

📊 Quality check: 7.4/10
   ⚠️  Issues found:
       - Description too generic (fixing...)
       - Missing examples in 4 sections (adding...)
       - Some outdated patterns (updating...)

🔧 Enhancing skill...
   ✏️  Description improved
   📝 Examples added
   🔄 Patterns updated

📊 Quality check: 8.9/10 ✅

🧪 Testing...
   ✅ 15/15 scenarios passing

✅ anchor-development skill ready!

Dependencies

Required:

Python 3.10+ (for quality scripts)
bash (for automation scripts)

Optional (auto-installed when needed):

Skill_Seekers (for documentation scraping)
- Will prompt for installation on first documentation-based request
- One-command setup:
```
scripts/install-skill-seekers.sh
```

Configuration

Environment variables (optional):

bash

# Skill_Seekers installation path
export SKILL_SEEKERS_PATH="$HOME/Skill_Seekers"

# Output directory for created skills
export SKILL_OUTPUT_DIR="$HOME/.claude/skills"

# Minimum quality score (default: 8.0)
export MIN_QUALITY_SCORE="8.0"

# Auto-install dependencies (default: prompt)
export AUTO_INSTALL_DEPS="true"

Examples

Example 1: Documentation Skill

User: "Create a React skill from react.dev"

Agent:
🔍 Analyzing... → Documentation-based
🔄 Scraping react.dev... → 3 min
📊 Quality: 7.8 → 8.6 ✅
🧪 Testing: 12/12 passing ✅
✅ react-development skill ready (8.6/10)

Example 2: Custom Workflow Skill

User: "Create a skill for debugging Solana transaction failures"

Agent:
🔍 Analyzing... → Custom workflow (no docs to scrape)
📝 Using TDD methodology...
🧪 RED: Testing baseline...
✏️  GREEN: Writing skill...
🔄 REFACTOR: Closing loopholes...
📊 Quality: 8.3 ✅
✅ solana-transaction-debugging skill ready (8.3/10)

Example 3: Hybrid Skill

User: "Create an Anchor skill with docs plus custom debugging workflows"

Agent:
🔍 Analyzing... → Hybrid (docs + custom)
📥 Scraping docs.rs/anchor-lang... → 2 min
📝 Adding custom debugging workflows...
🔄 Integrating and testing...
📊 Quality: 8.9 ✅
✅ anchor-development skill ready (8.9/10)

Quality Guarantee

Every skill delivered by skill-factory:

✅ Scores >= 8.0/10 on Anthropic best practices
✅ Has concrete examples (not abstract)
✅ Follows structure conventions
✅ Tested with auto-generated scenarios
✅ Ready to use immediately

If quality < 8.0, I keep working until it reaches 8.0+

Troubleshooting

Skill_Seekers installation fails:

bash

# Manual installation
git clone https://github.com/yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers ~/Skill_Seekers
cd ~/Skill_Seekers
pip install -r requirements.txt

# Or use installation script
~/Projects/claude-skills/skill-factory/skill/scripts/install-skill-seekers.sh

Quality score stuck below 8.0:

I'll report what's blocking and suggest manual review
Check references/anthropic-best-practices.md for criteria
Run manual enhancement if needed

Want to understand methodology:

See references/obra-tdd-methodology.md (testing approach)
See references/anthropic-best-practices.md (quality criteria)
See references/skill-seekers-integration.md (automation details)

Reference Files

Anthropic Official Documentation:

references/overview.md - Agent Skills architecture, progressive disclosure, and platform details
references/quickstart.md - Quick tutorial on using pre-built Agent Skills in the Claude API
references/best-practices.md - Comprehensive authoring guidelines from Anthropic
references/anthropic-best-practices.md - Quality scoring system (10/10 criteria)

Skill Factory Implementation Details:

references/obra-tdd-methodology.md - Full TDD testing approach
references/skill-seekers-integration.md - Automation documentation
references/request-analysis.md - How requests are parsed
references/quality-loops.md - Enhancement algorithms

Scripts Reference

Available helper scripts in

scripts/

directory:

check-skill-seekers.sh - Check if Skill_Seekers is installed
install-skill-seekers.sh - One-command Skill_Seekers setup
quality-check.py - Score any skill against Anthropic best practices

Usage examples:

bash

# Check Skill_Seekers installation
./scripts/check-skill-seekers.sh

# Install Skill_Seekers
./scripts/install-skill-seekers.sh

# Quality check a skill
python3 ./scripts/quality-check.py /path/to/skill/SKILL.md

Philosophy

You don't want to:

Navigate decision trees
Choose between tools
Check quality manually
Test with subagents yourself
Wonder if output is good

You want to:

Describe what you need
Get high-quality result
Start using immediately

That's what skill-factory delivers.

Credits

Built on top of excellent tools:

Skill_Seekers - Documentation scraping
obra/superpowers-skills - TDD methodology
Anthropic skill-creator - Best practices

Skill-factory orchestrates these tools with automatic quality assurance and testing.

Just tell me what skill you need. I'll handle the rest.

skill-factory

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

Skill Factory

What This Does

Anthropic's Official Best Practices

Usage

What You Get

How It Works (Behind the Scenes)

Phase 1: Request Analysis (Automatic)

Phase 2: Execution (Automatic)

Phase 3: Quality Assurance Loop (Automatic)

Phase 4: Testing (Automatic)

Phase 5: Delivery (Automatic)

Progress Reporting

Dependencies

Configuration

Examples

Quality Guarantee

Troubleshooting

Reference Files

Scripts Reference

Philosophy

Credits