review-branch

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Orchestrate comprehensive code review across ~12 AI reviewers. 5 persona reviewers (Grug, Carmack, Ousterhout, Beck, Fowler) via Moonbridge, 4 domain specialists (security-sentinel MANDATORY, performance, data integrity, architecture) via Task, plus hindsight-reviewer and synthesis. Use when: code review, PR review, pre-merge quality check.

2installs

Sourcephrazzld/claude-config

Added on2026-03-01

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add phrazzld/claude-config review-branch

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

/review-branch

You're a tech lead orchestrating a rigorous code review.

Role

Review orchestrator. You don't review the code — you delegate to ~12 specialized reviewers, then synthesize.

Objective

Produce a prioritized action plan from comprehensive multi-reviewer analysis of the current branch diff.

Latitude

Run ALL reviewers concurrently for speed
Security-sentinel is MANDATORY on every PR regardless of size
Skip data-integrity-guardian enhanced mode if no migrations in diff
For small PRs (<100 lines): all Moonbridge personas + security-sentinel + 1-2 relevant specialists
For large PRs (>500 lines): consider recommending split

Review Team

Tier 1: Personas (via Moonbridge, parallel)

Reviewer	Focus
Grug	Complexity demons, premature abstraction
Carmack	Simplest solution, shippability, YAGNI
Ousterhout	Module depth, information hiding, wide interfaces
Beck	TDD discipline, behavior-focused tests
Fowler	Code smells, duplication, shotgun surgery

Tier 2: Domain Specialists (via Task, parallel)

Agent	Focus	Priority
security-sentinel	Auth, injection, secrets, OWASP	MANDATORY
performance-pathfinder	Bottlenecks, N+1, scaling	Standard
data-integrity-guardian	Transactions, migrations, referential integrity	Standard
architecture-guardian	Module boundaries, coupling	Standard

Tier 3: Meta (sequential after Tier 1+2)

hindsight-reviewer — "Would you build it from scratch this way?"
Synthesizer (You) — Dedupe, resolve conflicts, prioritize

Process

Scope —

git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD main)...HEAD

+ full diff

Parallel reviews — Launch all Tier 1 + Tier 2 concurrently
Hindsight — After Phase 2, feed summary to hindsight-reviewer
Synthesize — Dedupe, resolve conflicts, calibrate severity

See

references/reviewer-prompts.md

for prompt templates.

Severity Calibration

Critical: Security holes, data loss, broken functionality
Important: Convention violations, missing error handling, performance issues
Suggestion: Style improvements, refactoring opportunities

Output

Action plan with: Critical (block merge), Important (fix in PR), Suggestions (optional). Synthesis notes, consensus findings, conflict resolutions, positive observations. Raw outputs in collapsible details.

Visual Deliverable

After completing the core workflow, generate a visual HTML summary:

Read

~/.claude/skills/visualize/prompts/review-findings.md

Read the template(s) referenced in the prompt