requirements-engineering

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Use when "requirements document", "acceptance criteria", "user stories", "EARS format", "specification", "feature spec", "product requirements"

4installs

Sourceeyadsibai/ltk

Added on2026-02-14

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add eyadsibai/ltk requirements-engineering

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Requirements Engineering

Structured approaches for capturing what to build before how to build it.

Core Principle

Specify WHAT, not HOW. Requirements describe outcomes and behaviors, not implementation details.

EARS Format

Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax - structured acceptance criteria.

Pattern	Template	Use Case
Event-driven	WHEN [event] THEN [system] SHALL [response]	User actions, triggers
Conditional	IF [condition] THEN [system] SHALL [response]	Business rules
State-driven	WHILE [state] [system] SHALL [response]	Ongoing behaviors
Ubiquitous	WHERE [feature] [system] SHALL [response]	Always-true rules
Unconditional	[system] SHALL [response]	Basic capabilities

Examples

Type	Example
Event	WHEN user clicks "Submit" THEN system SHALL validate all required fields
Conditional	IF user is not authenticated THEN system SHALL redirect to login
State	WHILE file is uploading system SHALL display progress indicator
Ubiquitous	WHERE data is displayed system SHALL use consistent date format

User Story Format

As a [role]
I want [capability]
So that [benefit]

Good vs Bad

Bad	Good
As a user I want to login	As a returning customer I want to login with my email so that I can access my order history
As a user I want a button	As a content creator I want a publish button so that I can share my work publicly

Key concept: The "so that" clause reveals the actual need - often the stated "want" isn't what's really needed.

Requirements Document Structure

Section	Content
Problem Statement	What problem are we solving?
User Stories	Who wants what and why?
Acceptance Criteria	How do we know it's done? (EARS)
Non-Functional	Performance, security, accessibility
Out of Scope	What we're NOT building
Success Metrics	How do we measure success?

Constitution (Governing Principles)

For complex projects, establish guiding principles before features:

Element	Purpose
Core Values	What matters most (simplicity > cleverness)
Technical Principles	Architecture standards
Decision Framework	How to make trade-offs
Quality Standards	Testing, review requirements

Key concept: Constitution prevents scope creep and ensures consistency across features.

Clarification Techniques

Before implementation, resolve ambiguities:

Technique	When to Use
Ask "what if"	Edge cases, error scenarios
Present options	Multiple valid approaches
Challenge assumptions	"Is this actually required?"
Define boundaries	What's in/out of scope

Questions to Ask

What happens when [edge case]?
What does success look like?
What's the minimum viable version?
What can we defer to later?

Non-Functional Requirements

Category	Questions to Answer
Performance	Response time? Throughput? Concurrent users?
Security	Authentication? Authorization? Data protection?
Accessibility	WCAG level? Screen reader support?
Scalability	Expected growth? Peak load?
Reliability	Uptime requirements? Recovery time?

Anti-Patterns

Don't	Why
Specify implementation	"Use React" locks in decisions
Assume requirements	Validate with stakeholders
Skip edge cases	They become bugs later
Mix requirements with design	Conflates what with how
Write vague criteria	"System should be fast" is untestable

Testable vs Untestable

Untestable	Testable
"Fast response"	"Response under 200ms"
"User-friendly"	"Task completable in <3 clicks"
"Secure"	"Passwords hashed with bcrypt"
"Scalable"	"Handles 10K concurrent users"

Key concept: If you can't write a test for it, it's not a requirement - it's a wish.