Quick Code Review

Context

• Current branch: !

  git branch --show-current

• Git status: !

  git status --porcelain

• Base branch: !

  (git show-branch | grep '*' | grep -v "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)" | head -1 | sed 's/.*\[\([^]]*\)\].*/\1/' | sed 's/\^.*//' 2>/dev/null) || echo "develop"

• Changes since base: !

  BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD develop 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null) && git log --oneline $BASE..HEAD

• Files changed since base: !

  BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD develop 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null) && git diff --name-only $BASE..HEAD

• Test commands available: !

  ([ -f package.json ] && echo "npm/pnpm/yarn test") || ([ -f Cargo.toml ] && echo "cargo test") || ([ -f pyproject.toml ] && echo "pytest/uv run pytest") || ([ -f go.mod ] && echo "go test") || echo "no standard test framework detected"

Requirements

• Use @tech-lead-reviewer — architectural impact assessment — to scope the review and decide which specialized agents are required.
• Launch only the necessary specialized reviews to minimize turnaround time.
• Summarize results by priority (Critical → High → Medium → Low) and confidence (High → Medium → Low).
• Offer optional implementation support and ensure resulting commits follow Git commit conventions (See

  ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/references/git-commit-conventions.md

  for details).

Your Task

1. Run an initial assessment with @tech-lead-reviewer — architectural impact assessment — to gauge architectural, security, and UX risk, and determine if a deeper review is needed.
2. Trigger the relevant specialized reviews via the Task tool, gather targeted feedback, and resolve conflicting recommendations.
3. Present a concise summary, ask whether the user wants fixes implemented, and if confirmed, apply changes, refactor with @code-simplifier — code simplification and optimization —, test, and stage commits before reporting outcomes.

Targeted Review Flow

• Selective Agents:
  • @code-reviewer — logic correctness, tests, error handling.
  • @security-reviewer — authentication, data protection, validation.
  • @ux-reviewer — usability and accessibility (skip if purely backend/CLI).
• Results Analysis: Organize findings using the priority/confidence matrix and provide actionable steps.
• Optional Implementation: Execute requested fixes, optimize the code, rerun tests, and prepare commits that adhere to the standards fragment.
• Closure: Push updates if changes were made and confirm review completion with the user.