LLM and Agentic Observability

Answer user questions about monitoring LLMs and agentic components using data ingested into Elastic only. Focus on LLM performance, cost and token utilization, response quality, and call chaining or agentic workflow orchestration. Use ES|QL, Elasticsearch APIs, and (where needed) Kibana APIs. Do not rely on Kibana UI; the skill works without it. A given deployment typically uses one or more ingestion paths (APM/OTLP traces and/or integration metrics/logs)— discover what is available before querying.

Where to look

Trace and metrics data (APM / OTel): Trace data in Elastic is stored in traces*
when collected by the Elastic APM Agent, and in traces-generic.otel-default
(and similar) when collected by OpenTelemetry. Use the generic pattern traces*
to find all trace data regardless of source. When the application is instrumented with OpenTelemetry (e.g. Elastic Distributions of OpenTelemetry (EDOT), OpenLLMetry, OpenLIT, Langtrace exporting to OTLP), LLM and agent spans land in these trace data streams; metrics may land in metrics-apm*
or metrics-generic. Query traces*
and metrics*
data streams for per-request and aggregated LLM signals.
Integration metrics and logs: When the user collects data via Elastic LLM integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Foundry, Amazon Bedrock, Bedrock AgentCore, GCP Vertex AI, etc.), metrics and logs go to integration data streams (e.g.
```
metrics*
```
,
```
logs*
```
with dataset/namespace per integration). Check which data streams exist.
Discover first: Use Elasticsearch to list data streams or indices (e.g.
```
GET _data_stream
```
, or
```
GET traces*/_mapping
```
,
```
GET metrics*/_mapping
```
) and optionally sample a document to see which LLM-related fields are present. Do not assume both APM and integration data exist.
ES|QL: Use the elasticsearch-esql skill for ES|QL syntax, commands, and query patterns when building queries against
```
traces*
```
or metrics data streams.
Alerts and SLOs: Use the Observability APIs SLOs API (Stack | Serverless) and Alerting API (Stack | Serverless) to find SLOs and alerting rules that target LLM-related data (e.g. services backed by
```
traces*
```
, or integration metrics). Firing alerts or violated/degrading SLOs point to potential degraded performance.

Data available in Elastic

From traces and metrics (traces, metrics-apm / metrics-generic)

Spans from OTel/EDOT (and compatible SDKs) carry span attributes that may follow OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions or provider-specific names. In Elasticsearch, attributes typically appear under

span.attributes

(exact key names depend on ingestion). Common attributes:

Purpose	Example attribute names (OTel GenAI)
Operation / provider	`gen_ai.operation.name` , `gen_ai.provider.name`
Model	`gen_ai.request.model` , `gen_ai.response.model`
Token usage	`gen_ai.usage.input_tokens` , `gen_ai.usage.output_tokens`
Request config	`gen_ai.request.temperature` , `gen_ai.request.max_tokens`
Errors	`error.type`
Conversation / agent	`gen_ai.conversation.id` ; tool/agent spans as child spans

Cost is not in the OTel spec; some instrumentations add custom attributes (e.g.

llm.response.cost.usd_estimate

). Discover actual field names from the index mapping or a sample document (e.g.

span.attributes.*

or flattened keys).

Use duration and event.outcome on spans for latency and success/failure. Use trace.id, span.id, and parent/child span relationships to analyze call chaining and agentic workflows (e.g. one root span, multiple LLM or tool-call child spans).

From LLM integrations

Integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock, Bedrock AgentCore, Vertex AI, etc.) ship metrics (and where supported logs) to Elastic. Metrics typically include token usage, request counts, latency, and—where the integration supports it—cost-related fields. Logs may include prompt/response or guardrail events. Exact field names and data streams are defined by each integration package; discover them from the integration docs or from the target data stream mapping.

Determine what data is available

List data streams:
```
GET _data_stream
```
and filter for
```
traces*
```
,
```
metrics-apm*
```
(or
```
metrics*
```
), and
```
metrics-*
```
/
```
logs-*
```
that match known LLM integration datasets (e.g. from Elastic LLM observability).
Inspect trace indices: For
```
traces*
```
, run a small search or use mapping to see if spans contain
```
gen_ai.*
```
or
```
llm.*
```
(or similar) attributes. Confirm presence of token, model, and duration fields.
Inspect integration indices: For metrics/logs data streams, check mapping or one document to see token, cost, latency, and model dimensions.
Use one source per use case: If both APM and integration data exist, prefer one consistent source for a given question (e.g. use traces for per-request chain analysis, integration metrics for aggregate token/cost).
Check alerts and SLOs: Use the SLOs API and Alerting API to list SLOs and alerting rules that target LLM-related services or integration metrics, and to get open or recently fired alerts. Firing alerts or SLOs in degrading/violated status point to potential degraded performance.

Use cases and query patterns

LLM performance (latency, throughput, errors)

Traces: ES|QL on
```
traces*
```
filtered by span attributes (e.g.
```
gen_ai.operation.name
```
or
```
gen_ai.provider.name
```
when present). Compute throughput (count per time bucket), latency (e.g.
```
duration.us
```
or span duration), and error rate (
```
event.outcome == "failure"
```
) by model, service, or time.
Integrations: Query integration metrics for request rate, latency, and error metrics by model/dimension as exposed by the integration.

Cost and token utilization

Traces: Aggregate from spans in
```
traces*
```
: sum
```
gen_ai.usage.input_tokens
```
and
```
gen_ai.usage.output_tokens
```
(or equivalent attribute names) by time, model, or service. If a cost attribute exists (e.g. custom
```
llm.response.cost.*
```
), sum it for cost views.
Integrations: Use integration metrics that expose token counts and/or cost; aggregate by time and model.

Response quality and safety

Traces: Use
```
event.outcome
```
,
```
error.type
```
, and span attributes (e.g.
```
gen_ai.response.finish_reasons
```
) in
```
traces*
```
to identify failures, timeouts, or content filters. Correlate with prompts/responses if captured in attributes (e.g.
```
gen_ai.input.messages
```
,
```
gen_ai.output.messages
```
) and not redacted.
Integrations: Query integration logs for guardrail blocks, content filter events, or policy violations (e.g. Bedrock Guardrails) using the fields defined by that integration.

Call chaining and agentic workflow orchestration

Traces only: Use trace hierarchy in
```
traces*
```
. Filter by root service or trace attributes; group by
```
trace.id
```
and use parent/child span relationships (e.g.
```
parent.id
```
,
```
span.id
```
) to reconstruct chains (e.g. orchestration span → multiple LLM or tool-call spans). Aggregate by span name or
```
gen_ai.operation.name
```
to see distribution of steps (e.g. retrieval, LLM, tool use). Duration per span and per trace gives bottleneck and end-to-end latency.

Using ES|QL for LLM data

Availability: ES|QL is available in Elasticsearch 8.11+ (GA in 8.14) and in Elastic Observability Serverless.
Scoping: Always restrict by time range (
```
@timestamp
```
). When present, add
```
service.name
```
and optionally
```
service.environment
```
. For LLM-specific spans, filter by span attributes once you know the field names (e.g. a keyword field for
```
gen_ai.provider.name
```
or
```
gen_ai.operation.name
```
).
Performance: Use
```
LIMIT
```
, coarse time buckets when only trends are needed, and avoid full scans over large windows.

Workflow

text

LLM observability progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Determine available data (traces*, metrics-apm* or metrics*, or integration data streams)
- [ ] Step 2: Discover LLM-related field names (mapping or sample doc)
- [ ] Step 3: Run ES|QL or Elasticsearch queries for the user's question (performance, cost, quality, orchestration)
- [ ] Step 4: Check for active alerts or SLOs defined on LLM-related data (Alerting API, SLOs API); field names from
        Step 2 help identify related rules; firing alerts or violated/degrading SLOs indicate potential degraded performance
- [ ] Step 5: Summarize findings from ingested data only; include alert/SLO status when relevant

Examples

Example: Token usage over time from traces

Assume span attributes are available as

span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.input_tokens

and

span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.output_tokens

(adjust to actual field names from mapping):

esql

FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
  AND span.attributes.gen_ai.provider.name IS NOT NULL
| STATS
    input_tokens = SUM(span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.input_tokens),
    output_tokens = SUM(span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.output_tokens)
  BY BUCKET(@timestamp, 1 hour), span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model
| SORT @timestamp
| LIMIT 500

Example: Latency and error rate by model

esql

FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
  AND span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model IS NOT NULL
| STATS
    request_count = COUNT(*),
    failures = COUNT(*) WHERE event.outcome == "failure",
    avg_duration_us = AVG(span.duration.us)
  BY span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model
| EVAL error_rate = failures / request_count
| LIMIT 100

Example: Agentic workflow (trace-level view)

Get trace IDs that contain at least one LLM span and count spans per trace to see chain length:

esql

FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
  AND span.attributes.gen_ai.operation.name IS NOT NULL
| STATS span_count = COUNT(*), total_duration_us = SUM(span.duration.us) BY trace.id
| WHERE span_count > 1
| SORT total_duration_us DESC
| LIMIT 50

Example: Integration metrics (Amazon Bedrock AgentCore)

The Amazon Bedrock AgentCore integration ships metrics to the

metrics-aws_bedrock_agentcore.metrics-*

data stream (time series index). Use TS
for aggregations on time series data streams (Elasticsearch 9.2+); use a time range with TRANGE
(9.3+). The integration’s dashboards and alerting rule templates Example: token usage (counter), invocations (counter), and average latency (gauge) by hour and agent:

esql

TS metrics-aws_bedrock_agentcore.metrics-*
| WHERE TRANGE(7 days)
  AND aws.dimensions.Operation == "InvokeAgentRuntime"
| STATS
    total_tokens = SUM(RATE(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.TokenCount.sum)),
    total_invocations = SUM(RATE(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.Invocations.sum)),
    avg_latency_ms = AVG(AVG_OVER_TIME(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.Latency.avg))
  BY TBUCKET(1 hour), aws.bedrock_agentcore.agent_name
| SORT TBUCKET(1 hour) DESC

For Elasticsearch 8.x or when

TS

is not available, use

FROM

with

BUCKET(@timestamp, 1 hour)

and

SUM

AVG

over the metric fields (as in the integration's alert rule templates). For other LLM integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Vertex AI, etc.), use that integration’s data stream index pattern and field names from its package (see Elastic LLM observability).

Guidelines

Data only in Elastic: Use only data collected and stored in Elastic (traces in
```
traces*
```
, metrics, or integration metrics/logs). Do not describe or rely on other vendors’ UIs or products.
One technology per customer: Assume a single ingestion path per deployment when answering; discover which (traces vs integration) exists and use it consistently for the question.
Discover field names: Before writing ES|QL or Query DSL, confirm LLM-related attribute or metric names from
```
_mapping
```
or a sample document; naming may differ (e.g.
```
gen_ai.*
```
vs
```
llm.*
```
or integration-specific fields).
No Kibana UI dependency: Prefer ES|QL and Elasticsearch APIs; use Kibana APIs only when needed (e.g. SLO, alerting). Do not instruct the user to open Kibana UI.
References: LLM and agentic AI observability, Observability Labs – LLM Observability, OpenTelemetry GenAI spans. For ES|QL syntax and query patterns, use the elasticsearch-esql skill, or look through ES|QL TS command reference for Elastic v9.3 or higher and for Serverless, and look through ES|QL FROM command reference for other Elastic versions.

observability-llm-obs

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

LLM and Agentic Observability

Where to look

Data available in Elastic

From traces and metrics (traces, metrics-apm / metrics-generic)

From LLM integrations

Determine what data is available

Use cases and query patterns

LLM performance (latency, throughput, errors)

Cost and token utilization

Response quality and safety

Call chaining and agentic workflow orchestration

Using ES|QL for LLM data

Workflow

Examples

Example: Token usage over time from traces

Example: Latency and error rate by model

Example: Agentic workflow (trace-level view)

Example: Integration metrics (Amazon Bedrock AgentCore)

Guidelines

observability-llm-obs

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

LLM and Agentic Observability

Where to look

Data available in Elastic

From traces and metrics (traces*, metrics-apm* / metrics-generic)

From LLM integrations

Determine what data is available

Use cases and query patterns

LLM performance (latency, throughput, errors)

Cost and token utilization

Response quality and safety

Call chaining and agentic workflow orchestration

Using ES|QL for LLM data

Workflow

Examples

Example: Token usage over time from traces

Example: Latency and error rate by model

Example: Agentic workflow (trace-level view)

Example: Integration metrics (Amazon Bedrock AgentCore)

Guidelines

From traces and metrics (traces, metrics-apm / metrics-generic)