niche-fit-scorer

Assessment Tone

Check for Brand Context

.claude/brand-context.md

• If it exists: Read it. Use the brand overview, target consumer, platform presence, content preferences, brand voice, and competitive landscape sections to inform the niche fit evaluation. Skip information gathering questions that the context already answers.
• If it does not exist: Proceed to information gathering below. Collect brand details before scoring.

Information Gathering

Brand Inputs (what you need about the brand)

1. Brand category and product type — What do they sell? What vertical are they in? (beauty, fashion, wellness, food, lifestyle, jewelry, or other)
2. Target consumer profile — Who buys the product? Age range, gender, interests, lifestyle signals, and price sensitivity.
3. Brand voice and aesthetic — How does the brand present itself? Aspirational, minimalist, bold, playful, science-forward, luxury, accessible? Reference any example posts or tone descriptions.
4. Campaign objective — What is this specific campaign trying to achieve? (awareness, content for ads, direct sales, community building, product launch)
5. Platform focus — Which platform matters most for this campaign? (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube)

Creator Inputs (what you need about the creator)

1. Creator bio and handle — Paste the bio text, or share the handle and platform.
2. Recent content sample — Describe or paste content from their last 10-20 posts: topics, formats, tone, and visual style.
3. Audience signals — Any available data: follower count, engagement rate, audience demographics, media kit excerpts. If none available, note that assessment will rely on content and bio analysis.
4. Previous brand partnerships — Any known sponsored content or brand collaborations, especially in the same or adjacent category.

Fallback Questions

• "What does your brand sell, and who's the core customer?"
• "Paste the creator's bio and describe their recent content — what topics do they cover most?"
• "What's the campaign goal — awareness, content for ads, or driving sales?"

Core Principles

1. Audience Match Beats Follower Count — A creator with 15K followers whose audience is exactly the brand's target consumer will outperform a 500K creator with scattered demographics. Niche fit scoring must weight audience alignment above reach. Test: if you removed the follower count from the evaluation, would you still pick this creator?
2. Organic Affinity Over Paid History — The strongest niche signal is whether a creator already talks about the category, uses similar products, or lives the lifestyle the brand represents — without being paid. A creator who has posted about clean beauty 40 times organically is a better fit for a clean beauty brand than one who did a single sponsored post for a competitor. Check the ratio of organic-to-sponsored content in the niche.
3. Content Context, Not Just Category — "Fitness creator" is not a niche. A yoga instructor, a CrossFit competitor, a postpartum fitness coach, and a gym-bro bodybuilder are all "fitness creators" but they fit completely different brands. Score the specific content context, not the broad category label.
4. The Audience Belief Test — When this creator recommends this product, will their audience believe it? If the recommendation would surprise or confuse the creator's followers, the niche fit is weak regardless of what the content calendar looks like. This is the single most important gut check in the entire evaluation.
5. Fit Is Campaign-Specific, Not Universal — A creator might be a 9/10 fit for a brand awareness campaign and a 4/10 for a product conversion campaign. Always score against the specific campaign objective, not just the brand in general.

Scoring Methodology

references/scoring-rubric.md

The 5 Dimensions

Scoring Steps

1. Gather evidence for each dimension. Review the creator's bio, recent content, engagement patterns, audience signals, and past partnerships. Document specific observations — not impressions.
2. Score each dimension 1-10. Use the detailed criteria in

   references/scoring-rubric.md

   . Anchor scores to the rubric descriptions, not gut feeling.
3. Calculate the weighted score. Multiply each dimension score by its weight, sum the results. This produces the final Niche Fit Score (1-10 scale).
4. Check for red flags. Review the red flag table in

   references/scoring-rubric.md

   . Any red flags override or adjust dimension scores regardless of the initial assessment.
5. Write the rationale. For each dimension, cite specific evidence from the creator's content, bio, or audience data. A score without evidence is an opinion, not an assessment.

Score Interpretation

What NOT to Do

• Do not conflate popularity with fit. A creator trending on TikTok this week is not automatically a fit for your wellness brand. Score the niche, not the hype.
• Do not score based on a single post. One skincare video doesn't make someone a skincare creator. Assess the content pattern across 20+ posts.
• Do not ignore platform mismatch. A creator who thrives on TikTok may not translate to Instagram, and vice versa. Score for the campaign's target platform.
• Do not assume audience from content. A creator posting about luxury fashion may have an audience that aspires to luxury but can't afford $200 products. Audience data matters more than content aesthetics.
• Do not skip the red flag check. High fake follower counts, recent brand safety issues, or exclusive competitor deals override niche fit scores.

Segment-Specific Guidance

Output Format

1. Summary Header

• Brand name + campaign objective (1 line)
• Creator handle, platform, follower count (1 line)
• Overall Niche Fit Score: X.X/10 — [Label] (bolded)

2. Dimension Scorecard (table)

3. Detailed Rationale (3-5 paragraphs)

• Walk through each dimension with specific evidence from the creator's content, bio, and audience signals.
• Call out the strongest fit signal and the biggest gap.
• Reference specific posts, topics, or patterns — not vague impressions.

4. Red Flags (if any)

• List any red flags from the override checklist with recommended action.

5. Recommendation

• Pursue / Proceed with caution / Pass — one clear recommendation.
• If "proceed with caution," specify exactly what the brief should address to compensate for fit gaps.
• If "pursue," note what makes this creator particularly strong for the campaign.

6. Comparison Notes (if scoring multiple creators)

• Rank creators by weighted score.
• Note which creators complement each other (e.g., one strong on authority, another on audience match).

Quality Check

1. Every dimension score has specific evidence cited — no scores justified only by "seems like a good fit."
2. The weighted calculation is correct — manually verify the math. A rounding error changes the recommendation tier.
3. Red flags have been checked — even if none are found, confirm the check was performed.
4. The recommendation matches the score — an 8.5 creator should not get a "proceed with caution" unless red flags explain the downgrade.
5. A Head of Influencer Marketing would forward this to their team and trust the recommendation — the assessment is specific enough to make a real partnership decision, not so generic it could describe any creator.

Related Skills

• If the user needs a full creator vetting beyond niche fit (brand safety, rates, compliance, content quality), see creator-vetting-scorecard.
• If the user wants to write outreach to a creator who passed niche fit evaluation, see outreach-writer.
• If the user needs to build a campaign brief before evaluating creators, see campaign-brief-generator.
• If the user needs to build a content brief for a creator they've already selected, see content-brief-builder.
• If the brand context is missing or incomplete, see brand-context.