name-checker

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Check product/brand names for trademark, domain, and social media conflicts. Use when users ask to "check this name", "validate a product name", "is this name available", or need to assess naming risks. Provides risk assessment and alternative suggestions.

2installs

Sourceluongnv89/skills

Added on2026-02-17

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add luongnv89/skills name-checker

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Name Checker

Check product and brand names for conflicts across trademarks, domains, and social media.

Input

Name to analyze provided in

$ARGUMENTS

. If empty, ask user for the name.

Optionally check for

prd.md

in project to understand product context.

Analysis Protocol

CRITICAL: STOP immediately if any exact social handle is taken.

Step 1: Social Media Check (First Priority)

Use WebSearch to check handles on:

X/Twitter:

"@[NAME]" site:twitter.com OR site:x.com

Instagram:
```
"@[NAME]" site:instagram.com
```
Facebook:
```
"[NAME]" site:facebook.com
```
LinkedIn:
```
"[NAME]" site:linkedin.com/company
```
YouTube:
```
"[NAME]" site:youtube.com
```
TikTok:
```
"@[NAME]" site:tiktok.com
```

If exact handle taken: Return

NEGATIVE: Exact social handle taken (@platform)

and STOP. Suggest different name.

Step 2: Domain Check (if Step 1 clear)

Use WebSearch to check:

```
.com
```
(highest priority)
```
.io
```
,
```
.app
```
,
```
.co
```
Regional:
```
.eu
```
,
```
.fr
```

Search:

site:[NAME].com

and

"[NAME].com" domain availability

Status:

Available: No active site
Parked: Domain exists but for-sale/parking
Active: In use (flag if same industry)

Step 3: Trademark Check (if Step 1 clear)

Use WebSearch for trademark databases:

Database	Search Query
WIPO	`"[NAME]" site:branddb.wipo.int`
EUIPO	`"[NAME]" site:euipo.europa.eu`
INPI (France)	`"[NAME]" site:inpi.fr`

Focus on Nice Classes 9, 35, 42 (software/technology). Note if marks are live or expired.

Step 4: Risk Assessment

Risk Level	Criteria
Low	Social handles available, .com available/parked, no trademark conflicts
Moderate	Some handles taken (not exact), .com taken but alternatives available, similar trademarks exist
High	Multiple handles taken, .com active in same industry, active trademarks in classes 9/35/42

Step 5: Recommendation

Proceed: Low risk - name is viable
Modify: Moderate risk - suggest 1-2 variants addressing conflicts
Abandon: High risk - suggest completely different alternatives

Output Format

SOCIAL: Clear | NEGATIVE: [reason]
DOMAIN: .com (status) | .io (status) | .app (status)
TM: WIPO (status) | EUIPO (status) | INPI (status)
RISK: [Low/Moderate/High] - [reason]
RECOMMEND: [Proceed/Modify/Abandon] (+ variants if needed)

PRD Integration

If

prd.md

found, add:

Name Fit Assessment:

Alignment with product vision
Memorability, pronunciation, spelling
Target audience fit

Alternative Suggestions:

Name	Rationale	Quick Risk
Name1	Why it fits	Availability
Name2	Why it fits	Availability
Name3	Why it fits	Availability

Final Action

Proceed: Confirm safe to use, suggest registration order (domain first, then socials)
Modify: Recommend best variant with explanation
Abandon: Recommend best alternative from suggestions