Loading...
Loading...
Two-round debate protocol where perspectives challenge each other before consensus. Round 1 presents independent positions, Round 2 allows counter-arguments and rebuttals. Produces battle-tested decisions for high-stakes choices.
npx skill4agent add fatih-developer/fth-skills multi-brain-debate1. Understand the request
2. Round 1: Independent positions (3 perspectives)
3. Round 2: Counter-arguments and rebuttals
4. Judge's verdict (consensus)
5. Produce full output with debate trail visible## 🧠 Debate — Round 1: Opening Positions
**Instance A — Creative:**
[2-3 sentences: position + rationale]
**Instance B — Pragmatic:**
[2-3 sentences: position + rationale]
**Instance C — Comprehensive:**
[2-3 sentences: position + rationale]## ⚔️ Debate — Round 2: Challenges
**A challenges B:**
[1-2 sentences: specific weakness identified]
**B challenges C:**
[1-2 sentences: specific weakness identified]
**C challenges A:**
[1-2 sentences: specific weakness identified]
**Rebuttals:**
- **A responds:** [1 sentence defense or concession]
- **B responds:** [1 sentence defense or concession]
- **C responds:** [1 sentence defense or concession]## ⚖️ Verdict
**Winner:** [Which perspective's core argument survived the debate]
**Incorporated from others:** [Elements from losing arguments that strengthen the decision]
**Eliminated:** [Arguments that were successfully challenged and dropped]| Situation | Use |
|---|---|
| High-stakes architecture decision | Debate |
| Choosing between competing technologies | Debate |
| Quick implementation question | Base multi-brain |
| Strategy with long-term consequences | Debate |
| Simple feature decision | Base multi-brain |
| Security-sensitive design | Debate |
references/EXAMPLES.md