Concurrency

Layer 1: Language Mechanics

Core Question

Is this CPU-bound or I/O-bound, and what's the sharing model?

Before choosing concurrency primitives:

What's the workload type?
What data needs to be shared?
What's the thread safety requirement?

Error → Design Question

Error	Don't Just Say	Ask Instead
E0277 Send	"Add Send bound"	Should this type cross threads?
E0277 Sync	"Wrap in Mutex"	Is shared access really needed?
Future not Send	"Use spawn_local"	Is async the right choice?
Deadlock	"Reorder locks"	Is the locking design correct?

Thinking Prompt

Before adding concurrency:

What's the workload?
- CPU-bound → threads (std::thread, rayon)
- I/O-bound → async (tokio, async-std)
- Mixed → hybrid approach
What's the sharing model?
- No sharing → message passing (channels)
- Immutable sharing → Arc<T>
- Mutable sharing → Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>
What are the Send/Sync requirements?
- Cross-thread ownership → Send
- Cross-thread references → Sync
- Single-thread async → spawn_local

Trace Up ↑ (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Don't just fix the error. Trace UP to find domain constraints.

Domain Detection Table

Context Keywords	Load Domain Skill	Key Constraint
Web API, HTTP, axum, actix, handler	domain-web	Handlers run on any thread
交易, 支付, trading, payment	domain-fintech	Audit + thread safety
gRPC, kubernetes, microservice	domain-cloud-native	Distributed tracing
CLI, terminal, clap	domain-cli	Usually single-thread OK

Example: Web API + Rc Error

"Rc cannot be sent between threads" in Web API context
    ↑ DETECT: "Web API" → Load domain-web
    ↑ FIND: domain-web says "Shared state must be thread-safe"
    ↑ FIND: domain-web says "Rc in state" is Common Mistake
    ↓ DESIGN: Use Arc<T> with State extractor
    ↓ IMPL: axum::extract::State<Arc<AppConfig>>

Generic Trace

"Send not satisfied for my type"
    ↑ Ask: What domain is this? Load domain-* skill
    ↑ Ask: Does this type need to cross thread boundaries?
    ↑ Check: m09-domain (is the data model correct?)

Situation	Trace To	Question
Send/Sync in Web	domain-web	What's the state management pattern?
Send/Sync in CLI	domain-cli	Is multi-thread really needed?
Mutex vs channels	m09-domain	Shared state or message passing?
Async vs threads	m10-performance	What's the workload profile?

Trace Down ↓

From design to implementation:

"Need parallelism for CPU work"
    ↓ Use: std::thread or rayon

"Need concurrency for I/O"
    ↓ Use: async/await with tokio

"Need to share immutable data across threads"
    ↓ Use: Arc<T>

"Need to share mutable data across threads"
    ↓ Use: Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>
    ↓ Or: channels for message passing

"Need simple atomic operations"
    ↓ Use: AtomicBool, AtomicUsize, etc.

Send/Sync Markers

Marker	Meaning	Example
`Send`	Can transfer ownership between threads	Most types
`Sync`	Can share references between threads	`Arc<T>`
`!Send`	Must stay on one thread	`Rc<T>`
`!Sync`	No shared refs across threads	`RefCell<T>`

Quick Reference

Pattern	Thread-Safe	Blocking	Use When
`std::thread`	Yes	Yes	CPU-bound parallelism
`async/await`	Yes	No	I/O-bound concurrency
`Mutex<T>`	Yes	Yes	Shared mutable state
`RwLock<T>`	Yes	Yes	Read-heavy shared state
`mpsc::channel`	Yes	Optional	Message passing
`Arc<Mutex<T>>`	Yes	Yes	Shared mutable across threads

Decision Flowchart

What type of work?
├─ CPU-bound → std::thread or rayon
├─ I/O-bound → async/await
└─ Mixed → hybrid (spawn_blocking)

Need to share data?
├─ No → message passing (channels)
├─ Immutable → Arc<T>
└─ Mutable →
   ├─ Read-heavy → Arc<RwLock<T>>
   └─ Write-heavy → Arc<Mutex<T>>
   └─ Simple counter → AtomicUsize

Async context?
├─ Type is Send → tokio::spawn
├─ Type is !Send → spawn_local
└─ Blocking code → spawn_blocking

Common Errors

Error	Cause	Fix
E0277 `Send` not satisfied	Non-Send in async	Use Arc or spawn_local
E0277 `Sync` not satisfied	Non-Sync shared	Wrap with Mutex
Deadlock	Lock ordering	Consistent lock order
`future is not Send`	Non-Send across await	Drop before await
`MutexGuard` across await	Guard held during suspend	Scope guard properly

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	Why Bad	Better
Arc<Mutex<T>> everywhere	Contention, complexity	Message passing
thread::sleep in async	Blocks executor	tokio::time::sleep
Holding locks across await	Blocks other tasks	Scope locks tightly
Ignoring deadlock risk	Hard to debug	Lock ordering, try_lock

Async-Specific Patterns

Avoid MutexGuard Across Await

rust

// Bad: guard held across await
let guard = mutex.lock().await;
do_async().await;  // guard still held!

// Good: scope the lock
{
    let guard = mutex.lock().await;
    // use guard
}  // guard dropped
do_async().await;

Non-Send Types in Async