Loading...
Loading...
Eva Lens 2.2.8: Entry for Multi-Perspective and Disciplinary Divergence. It is used to place unformed topics, phenomena or questions into the most explanatory disciplines to open up new perspectives, or to conduct four-perspective quick supplementation, single-perspective targeted analysis, or in-depth review on formed ideas, topics, titles, scripts, review conclusions, business judgments and plans. Triggers: /eva-lens, Eva Lens, "Take a look with Lens", disciplinary divergence, interdisciplinary divergence, "View from perspectives of sociology, psychology, economics, etc.", "Help me open up more explanatory mechanisms", multi-perspective, "View from different perspectives", "Fill in blind spots", reader perspective, opponent perspective, industry reality perspective, creator perspective, in-depth review, in-depth deduction, find counterexamples, check weak premises, find falsification conditions, conduct counterfactual analysis, reverse review current judgments. General requests like "Help me think", "Chat with me" are still handled by Eva Think. Lens does not file records, save data, or perform persona simulation or character discussions.
npx skill4agent add lulu-eva/eva-skill eva-lensreferences/lens/00_entry_入口与模式.mdDisciplinary divergence -> ../eva-shared/references/lens/00_eva-lens-discipline-divergence_学科发散.md
Quick supplementation / Single-perspective -> references/lens/01_quick_快速补光.md
In-depth review -> references/lens/02_deep_深度审视.md
Need to judge evidence boundaries or cross-module exits -> references/lens/03_evidence_证据与出口边界.mdeva-memory/lens-card../eva-shared/references/shared/06_external-material-safety_外部材料安全边界.md../eva-shared/references/shared/07_next-step-navigation_动态选路与下一步推荐.mdreferences/lens/00_entry_入口与模式.mdUser's clear intention > Maturity of current object > Lens default judgment| Priority | User's requested output | Mode |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clearly requests in-depth review, in-depth deduction or systematic analysis, or requests any of counterexamples, weak premises, counterfactuals, falsification conditions | In-depth review |
| 2 | Only names one existing Lens perspective without requesting Deep output | Single-perspective targeted analysis |
| 3 | Clearly requests disciplinary, theoretical or mechanism divergence | Disciplinary divergence |
| 4 | Clearly requests multi-perspective, four perspectives, "view from different perspectives" without requesting Deep output | Quick supplementation |
| 5 | Only generalized "Look with Lens" | According to object maturity: topics enter disciplinary divergence, clear judgments enter quick supplementation |
| Mode | Convergence Content |
|---|---|
| Disciplinary divergence | Up to 3 most worthwhile directions to continue + 1 most recommended direction to prioritize |
| Quick supplementation | Biggest blind spot + only one point to revise in the next step |
| Single-perspective targeted analysis | Judgment from this perspective + strongest gap + one action |
| In-depth review | Currently most tenable judgment + weakest premise + what facts would overturn it + next action |