investor-materials

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

3installs

Sourceaffaan-m/everything-claude-code

Added on2026-02-28

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add affaan-m/everything-claude-code investor-materials

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Investor Materials

Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend.

When to Activate

creating or revising a pitch deck
writing an investor memo or one-pager
building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table
answering accelerator or incubator application questions
aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth

Golden Rule

All investor materials must agree with each other.

Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing:

traction metrics
pricing and revenue assumptions
raise size and instrument
use of funds
team bios and titles
milestones and timelines

If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting.

Core Workflow

inventory the canonical facts
identify missing assumptions
choose the asset type
draft the asset with explicit logic
cross-check every number against the source of truth

Asset Guidance

Pitch Deck

Recommended flow:

company + wedge
problem
solution
product / demo
market
business model
traction
team
competition / differentiation
ask
use of funds / milestones
appendix

If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with

frontend-slides

.

One-Pager / Memo

state what the company does in one clean sentence
show why now
include traction and proof points early
make the ask precise
keep claims easy to verify

Financial Model

Include:

explicit assumptions
bear / base / bull cases when useful
clean layer-by-layer revenue logic
milestone-linked spending
sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions

Accelerator Applications

answer the exact question asked
prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage
avoid puffery
keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model

Red Flags to Avoid

unverifiable claims
fuzzy market sizing without assumptions
inconsistent team roles or titles
revenue math that does not sum cleanly
inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

every number matches the current source of truth
use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly
assumptions are visible, not buried
the story is clear without hype language
the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting