Idea Ingest Skill

Filing rule: Read

skills/_brain-filing-rules.md

before creating any new page.

Contract

• Every ingested item has a brain page with genuine analysis (not just a summary)
• The author gets a people page (MANDATORY for anyone whose thinking is worth ingesting)
• Cross-links created bidirectionally (source ↔ author, source ↔ mentioned entities)
• Raw source preserved for provenance via

  gbrain files upload-raw

• Every fact has an inline

  [Source: ...]

  citation
• Filing follows primary subject rules (not format-based)

Iron Law: Back-Linking (MANDATORY)

- **YYYY-MM-DD** | Referenced in [page title](path) — brief context

Phases

1. Fetch the content. Use appropriate tools for the content type (web fetch for articles, API for tweets, PDF reader for documents).
2. Upload raw source. Save the fetched content for provenance:

   gbrain files upload-raw <file> --page <slug>

3. Identify the author — MANDATORY people page. Anyone whose thinking is worth ingesting is worth tracking.
   • Search brain for existing author page
   • If no page → CREATE ONE with compiled truth + timeline format
   • If page exists → update timeline with this new publication
   • Cross-link both directions
4. Save to brain. File by PRIMARY SUBJECT (read

   skills/_brain-filing-rules.md

   ):
   • About a person →

     people/

   • About a company →

     companies/

   • A reusable framework →

     concepts/

   • Raw data dump →

     sources/

5. Analyze for the user. Reply with analysis that connects the content to what the brain knows. Think about:
   • Active projects — is this relevant?
   • Contradictions — does this challenge existing brain knowledge?
   • Connections — does this involve known people/companies?
   • Don't just summarize. Tell the user things they wouldn't have noticed.
6. Sync.

   gbrain sync

   to update the index.

Output Format

# {Title} — {Author}

**Source:** {URL}
**Author:** {Author}, {role}
**Published:** {date}
**Ingested:** {date}

## Context
{Why this matters now, connected to brain knowledge}

## Summary
{3-5 bullet core arguments}

## Key Data / Claims
{Specific facts, numbers, quotes}

## Analysis
{How this connects to existing brain knowledge. What's new. What contradicts.}

Anti-Patterns

• Just summarizing without connecting to brain knowledge
• Filing everything in

  sources/

  (sources is for raw data dumps only)
• Skipping the author people page
• Not cross-linking to mentioned entities
• Ingesting without checking brain first for existing coverage