gpt-5-4-prompting

Original🇺🇸 English
Translated

Internal guidance for composing Codex and GPT-5.4 prompts for coding, review, diagnosis, and research tasks inside the Codex Claude Code plugin

3installs
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add openai/codex-plugin-cc gpt-5-4-prompting

Tags

Translated version includes tags in frontmatter

GPT-5.4 Prompting

Use this skill when
codex:codex-rescue
needs to ask Codex or another GPT-5.4-based workflow for help.
Prompt Codex like an operator, not a collaborator. Keep prompts compact and block-structured with XML tags. State the task, the output contract, the follow-through defaults, and the small set of extra constraints that matter.
Core rules:
  • Prefer one clear task per Codex run. Split unrelated asks into separate runs.
  • Tell Codex what done looks like. Do not assume it will infer the desired end state.
  • Add explicit grounding and verification rules for any task where unsupported guesses would hurt quality.
  • Prefer better prompt contracts over raising reasoning or adding long natural-language explanations.
  • Use XML tags consistently so the prompt has stable internal structure.
Default prompt recipe:
  • <task>
    : the concrete job and the relevant repository or failure context.
  • <structured_output_contract>
    or
    <compact_output_contract>
    : exact shape, ordering, and brevity requirements.
  • <default_follow_through_policy>
    : what Codex should do by default instead of asking routine questions.
  • <verification_loop>
    or
    <completeness_contract>
    : required for debugging, implementation, or risky fixes.
  • <grounding_rules>
    or
    <citation_rules>
    : required for review, research, or anything that could drift into unsupported claims.
When to add blocks:
  • Coding or debugging: add
    completeness_contract
    ,
    verification_loop
    , and
    missing_context_gating
    .
  • Review or adversarial review: add
    grounding_rules
    ,
    structured_output_contract
    , and
    dig_deeper_nudge
    .
  • Research or recommendation tasks: add
    research_mode
    and
    citation_rules
    .
  • Write-capable tasks: add
    action_safety
    so Codex stays narrow and avoids unrelated refactors.
How to choose prompt shape:
  • Use built-in
    review
    or
    adversarial-review
    commands when the job is reviewing local git changes. Those prompts already carry the review contract.
  • Use
    task
    when the task is diagnosis, planning, research, or implementation and you need to control the prompt more directly.
  • Use
    task --resume-last
    for follow-up instructions on the same Codex thread. Send only the delta instruction instead of restating the whole prompt unless the direction changed materially.
Working rules:
  • Prefer explicit prompt contracts over vague nudges.
  • Use stable XML tag names that match the block names from the reference file.
  • Do not raise reasoning or complexity first. Tighten the prompt and verification rules before escalating.
  • Ask Codex for brief, outcome-based progress updates only when the task is long-running or tool-heavy.
  • Keep claims anchored to observed evidence. If something is a hypothesis, say so.
Prompt assembly checklist:
  1. Define the exact task and scope in
    <task>
    .
  2. Choose the smallest output contract that still makes the answer easy to use.
  3. Decide whether Codex should keep going by default or stop for missing high-risk details.
  4. Add verification, grounding, and safety tags only where the task needs them.
  5. Remove redundant instructions before sending the prompt.
Reusable blocks live in references/prompt-blocks.md. Concrete end-to-end templates live in references/codex-prompt-recipes.md. Common failure modes to avoid live in references/codex-prompt-antipatterns.md.