finishing-a-development-branch

Original🇺🇸 English
Translated
1 scriptsChecked / no sensitive code detected

Complete development with structured merge/PR options. Use when ready to merge or submit work.

1installs
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add oimiragieo/agent-studio finishing-a-development-branch

Tags

Translated version includes tags in frontmatter

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests -> Present options -> Execute choice -> Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
bash
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

bash
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?
Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

bash
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>

# Pull latest
git pull

# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR

bash
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."
Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for exact confirmation.
If confirmed:
bash
git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:
Check if in worktree:
bash
git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)
If yes:
bash
git worktree remove <worktree-path>
For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyYes--Yes
2. Create PR-YesYes-
3. Keep as-is--Yes-
4. Discard---Yes (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification
  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
Open-ended questions
  • Problem: "What should I do next?" -> ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options
Automatic worktree cleanup
  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
No confirmation for discard
  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:
  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request
Always:
  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:
  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete
Pairs with:
  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS run the full test suite and verify it passes before offering any merge/PR option — presenting merge options with failing tests leads to broken main branches and failed CI pipelines.
  2. NEVER force-push to main/master or squash commits without explicit user request — these operations rewrite history and can permanently destroy teammates' work.
  3. ALWAYS present exactly the 4 structured options (merge, PR, keep, discard) — open-ended "what next?" questions cause confusion and missed cleanup steps.
  4. NEVER delete a branch or discard work without typed confirmation from the user — accidental deletion of uncommitted work is irreversible.
  5. ALWAYS clean up the worktree for Options 1 and 4 but preserve it for Options 2 and 3 — orphaned worktrees accumulate and confuse future git operations.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Skipping test verification before mergeBroken code lands on main; CI fails after the factAlways run test suite first; gate options on passing tests
Presenting open-ended completion questionsDeveloper doesn't know available paths; worktrees left orphanedPresent exactly 4 numbered options with clear labels
Deleting branch without confirmationDeveloper loses in-progress work permanentlyRequire typed "discard" confirmation for Option 4
Cleaning up worktree for Option 2 (PR)Kills local context before PR review is completeOnly remove worktree for Options 1 and 4
Merging directly without pulling latest baseMerge conflicts or stale base; CI detects drift
git pull
on base branch before
git merge

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
  • New pattern ->
    .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found ->
    .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made ->
    .claude/context/memory/decisions.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.