fetch-ci-build

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

2 scripts

Fetch CI build results and diagnose failures. Auto-detects provider from project files or URLs. Supports GitHub Actions, Buildkite, and CircleCI.

2installs

Sourcebuildrtech/dotagents

Added on2026-02-18

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add buildrtech/dotagents fetch-ci-build

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

Fetch CI Build

Overview

Fetch CI build results, diagnose failures, extract actionable error information, and suggest fixes. Supports multiple CI providers with automatic detection.

Supported Providers

Provider	Detection	Tool
GitHub Actions	`.github/workflows/` or `github.com` URL	`gh` CLI
Buildkite	`.buildkite/` or `buildkite.com` URL	Python script
CircleCI	`.circleci/` or `circleci.com` URL	Python script

Auto-Detection

From URL

If the user provides a CI URL, detect provider:

```
github.com/.../actions/runs/...
```
→ GitHub Actions
```
buildkite.com/...
```
→ Buildkite
```
app.circleci.com/...
```
or
```
circleci.com/...
```
→ CircleCI

From Project Files

Check for CI configuration directories:

bash

# GitHub Actions
test -d .github/workflows && echo "github"

# Buildkite
test -d .buildkite && echo "buildkite"

# CircleCI
test -d .circleci && echo "circleci"

Workflow

dot

digraph workflow {
    rankdir=TB;
    node [shape=box];
    
    detect [label="1. Detect CI provider"];
    load [label="2. Load provider reference"];
    fetch [label="3. Fetch build results"];
    check [label="4. Check for failures" shape=diamond];
    passed [label="Report: Build passed!"];
    read [label="5. Read failing source files"];
    present [label="6. Present failures + proposed fixes"];
    ask [label="7. Ask: Apply fix?" shape=diamond];
    apply [label="Apply the fix"];
    complex [label="Complex failure?" shape=diamond];
    debug [label="Use systematic-debugging skill"];
    next [label="Next failure?" shape=diamond];
    done [label="Done"];
    
    detect -> load;
    load -> fetch;
    fetch -> check;
    check -> passed [label="passed"];
    check -> read [label="failed"];
    read -> present;
    present -> ask;
    ask -> apply [label="yes"];
    ask -> complex [label="no"];
    apply -> next;
    complex -> debug [label="yes"];
    complex -> next [label="no"];
    debug -> next;
    next -> read [label="yes"];
    next -> done [label="no"];
}

Step-by-Step Process

1. Detect CI Provider

First, check if the user provided a URL. If not, detect from project files.

2. Load Provider Reference

Read the appropriate reference file for provider-specific commands:

GitHub: references/github.md
Buildkite: references/buildkite.md
CircleCI: references/circleci.md

3. Fetch Build Results

Use the provider-specific commands to fetch build information and failures.

4. For Each Failure

Read the relevant source file to understand context:

For test failures: read the test file at the indicated line
For lint errors: read the source file at the indicated line
For TypeScript errors: read the file and understand the type issue

5. Present Findings and Propose Fix

Show the user:

What failed (test name, file, line)
Error message
Proposed fix based on the error

6. Ask User What To Do

Ask how to proceed:

"Apply the suggested fix"
"Investigate further before fixing"
"Skip this failure"
"Use systematic-debugging for deeper investigation"

7. Complex Failures

If the failure requires deeper investigation (e.g., unclear root cause, flaky test, environmental issue), recommend the

systematic-debugging

skill.

Error Types Detected

Type	Detection	Common Fixes
Test failure	Minitest/RSpec/Jest/pytest output	Fix assertion, update expected value, fix test setup
Lint error	Rubocop/ESLint/Biome violations	Auto-fix with linter's fix command
TypeScript	TSC compilation errors	Add types, fix type mismatches
Build error	Compilation failures	Fix syntax, missing dependencies

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Solution
Can't detect provider	Specify provider explicitly or provide CI URL
Missing credentials	Check provider reference for required env vars/auth
Build still running	Wait for completion or check partial results
Rate limiting	Wait and retry

Integration with Other Skills

systematic-debugging: Use for complex failures requiring root cause analysis
test-driven-development: After fixing, ensure tests follow TDD principles
verification-before-completion: Run tests locally before pushing fix